The authors discuss the background and potential policy implications of a research project evaluating community support services for released prisoners with drug problems. They argue that while short-term and remand prisoners pose particular problems, success with these groups in terms of dealing with their drug misuse would offer clear benefits both to the community and to individual prisoners themselves. Other problems, such as the complexities associated with partnership working and the difficulties of bridging the prison/community divide are explored.
Bazemore, G. & Erbe, C. (2004) ‘Reintegration and Restorative Justice: Towards a Theory and Practice of Informal Social Control and Support’, in S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon, After Crime and Punishment, pp. 27-57. Cullompton: Willan .
2.
Burrows, J. , Clarke, A. , Davison, T. , Tarling, R. & Webb, S. (2000) Research into the Nature and Effectiveness of Drugs Throughcare. Home Office RDS Occasional Paper No 68.
3.
Carter, P. (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: A New Approach. London: Home Office .
4.
Department of Health (2002) Models of Care for Substance Misuse Treatment Promoting Quality, Efficiency and Effectiveness in Drug Misuse Treatment Services, Full Report for Consultation. London: HMSO .
5.
Halliday, J. (2001) Making Punishments Work: Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. London: HMSO.
6.
Hedderman, C. & Hough, M. (2004) ‘Getting Tough or Being Effective’, in G. Mair (ed.), What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan .
7.
HMIP (2001) Through the Prison Gate: A Joint Thematic Review by HM Inspectorates of Prisons and Probation. London: HMSO .
8.
HMPS (2000) Clinical Services for Substance Misuse. London: HMPS .
9.
Home Office (2002) Tackling Crack: A National Plan. London: HMSO .
10.
Home Office (2003) Occupation of Prisons, Remand Centres, Young Offender Institutions and Police Cells in England and Wales, 31 January. London: Home Office .
11.
Hough, M. (1996) Drugs Misuse and the Criminal Justice System: A Review of the Literature. DPI Paper 15. London .
12.
Jamel, J. & Mair, G. (2002) Prison Drugs Throughcare and Outreach Work. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University Centre for Criminal Justice .
13.
Lewis, S. , Maguire, M. , Raynor, P. , Vanstone, M. & Vennard, J. (2003) The Resettlement of Short-term Prisoners: An Evaluation of Seven Pathfinder Schemes Findings 200. London: Home Office .
14.
Mair, G. & Barton, A. (1998) The Prison Throughcare Project. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University Centre for Criminal Justice .
15.
Mair, G. & Barton, A. (2001) ‘Drugs Throughcare in a Local Prison’ , Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy8 (4): 335-345 .
16.
Malloch, M. (2003) ‘Women of Substances: Drug Using Women and Criminal Justice’ , in Criminal Justice Matters53 (Autumn): 25 .
17.
Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. Washington, DC: APA Books .
18.
Maruna, S. , Immarigeon, R. & Lebel, T. P. (2004) ‘Ex-offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice’, in S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon, After Crime and Punishment. Cullompton: Willan .
19.
Matthews, R. & Young, Y. (2003) The New Politics of Crime and Punishment. Cullompton: Willan .
20.
Morgan, R. (2004) ‘Resettlement, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and NOMS: Prospects and Problems’ , in Criminal Justice Matters56: 4 .
21.
Richards, S. C. & Jones, R. S. (2004) ‘Beating the Perpetual Incarceration Machine: Overcoming Structural Impediments to Re-entry’, in S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon, After Crime and Punishment. Cullompton: Willan .
22.
Social Exclusion Unit (2001) Reducing re-offending by Ex-prisoners. London: The Stationery Office .
