The exponential rise in probation caseloads has necessitated that some jurisdictions contract with private probation agencies and community-based private treatment providers. Regulations that monitor private providers are ill defined or absent, leaving standards open to broad interpretation. Attorneys in one jurisdiction that used private providers were surveyed to measure their beliefs about private treatment providers for people sentenced to probation. The research found that attorneys supported private provider representatives being present in court to contact defendants and to provide evidence to strengthen probation violations. Private agency reputation and standardized criteria were important to establish qualifications in offering supervision and treatment services.
Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N.G., Hoge, S.K., Monahan, J., & Eisenberg, M. (1996). Decision-making in criminal defense: An empirical study of insanity pleas and the impact of doubted client competence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87(1), 48-62.
4.
Bosco, R.J. (1998). Connecticut probation's partnership with the private sector. In National Institute of Corrections (Eds.), Topics in community corrections: Annual issue 1998 privatizing community supervision (pp. 8-12). Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.
5.
Camacho, C.M., & Alarid, L.F. (in press). The significance of the victim advocate for domestic violence victims in municipal court. Violence and Victims.
6.
Casey, P. (1998). Court populations in need of services: Defining the court's role. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 157-167.
7.
Center for Community Corrections. (1997). A call for punishments that make sense. Washington, DC : Author. Retrieved on February 4, 2008, from http://www.communitycorrectionsworks.org
8.
Christie, N. (2000). Crime control as industry: Towards gulags, Western style (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
9.
Conly, C. (1999). Coordinating community services for mentally ill offenders: Maryland's community criminal justice treatment program (NCJ 175046) . Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10.
Culp, R.F. (2005). The rise and stall of prison privatization: An integration of policy analysis perspectives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 412-442.
11.
Donziger, S.A. (1996). The real war on crime: The report of the national criminal justice commission. New York: HarperCollins.
12.
Feeley, M.M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategies of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
13.
Finn, M.A., & Muirhead-Steves, S. (2002). The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees. Justice Quarterly, 19, 293-312.
14.
Foot, M.T., Stolberg, A.L., & Shepherd, R. (2000). Attorney and judicial perceptions of the credibility of expert witness in child custody cases. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 33(1/2), 31-45.
15.
Gaes, G.G., Camp, S.D., Nelson, J.B., & Saylor, W.G. (2004). Measuring prison performance: Government privatization and accountability. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
16.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Hoge, S.K., Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 385-394.
18.
Joh, E.E. (2005). Conceptualizing the private police. Utah Law Review, 2, 573-617.
19.
Kramer, G.M., Wolbransky, M., & Heilbrun, K. (2007). Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence, strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 573-585.
20.
Kraska, P.B. (2004). Theorizing criminal justice: Eight essential orientations . Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
21.
Lucken, K. (1997a). The dynamics of penal reform. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 26, 367-384.
22.
Lucken, K. (1997b). Privatizing discretion: Rehabilitating treatment in community corrections. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 243-259.
23.
Lukemeyer, A., & McCorkle, R.C. (2006). Privatization of prisons: Impact on prison conditions. American Review of Public Administration , 36, 189-206.
24.
Maynard-Moody, S., Musheno, M., & Palumbo, D. (1990). Street-wise social policy: Resolving the dilemma of street-level influence and successful implementation. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 833-848.
25.
McCarthy, C., Lincoln, R., & Wilson, P. (2000). Privatising community corrections. Queensland, Australia: Center for Applied Psychology and Criminology, Bond University. Retrieved on November 15, 2007, from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/48
26.
Meyer, J., & Grant, A. (1996) The privatization of community corrections: Panacea or Pandora's box? In G. Mays & T. Gray (Eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
27.
Mulvey, E.P., Schubert, C.A., & Chung, H.L. (2007). Service use after court involvement in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 518-544.
28.
Nolan, J.L. (2003). Redefining criminal courts: Problem-solving and the meaning of justice. American Criminal Law Review, 40(4), 1541-1565.
29.
Oldfield, M. (1994). Talking quality, meaning control: McDonalds, the market and the probation service. Probation Journal, 41, 186-192.
30.
Padgett, K.G., Bales, W.D., & Blomberg, T.G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring . Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 61-92.
31.
Pozen, D. (2003). Managing a correctional marketplace: Prison privatization in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Politics, 19, 253-284.
32.
Price, B.E., & Riccucci, N.M. (2005). Exploring the determinants of decisions to privatize state prisons. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 223-235.
33.
Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 215-237.
34.
Schloss, C.S., & Alarid, L.F. (2007). Standards in the privatization of probation services: A statutory analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 233-245.
35.
Shelden, R.G., & Brown, W.B. (2000). The crime control industry and the management of the surplus population. Critical Criminology, 9(1/2), 39-62.
36.
Shilton, M.K. (1992). Community corrections acts for state and local partnerships. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association. Retrieved on November 15, 2007 , from http://www.nicic.org/pubs/1992/010132.pdf
37.
Shilton, M.K. (1999). Prosecutors' participation. In Center for Community Corrections (Eds.), Partnerships in corrections: Six perspectives (pp. 35-58). Washington, DC: Center for Community Corrections. Retrieved on February 4, 2008, from http://www.communitycorrectionsworks.org/steve/ourresources/publications/partnerships.pdf
38.
Slate, R.N. (2003). From the jailhouse to Capitol Hill: Impacting mental health court legislation and defining what constitutes a mental health court. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 6-29.
39.
Stinson, V., Devenport, J.L., Cutler, B.L., & Kravitz, D.A. (1996). How effective is the presence of counsel safeguard? Attorney perceptions of suggestiveness, fairness, and correctability of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 64-75.
40.
Taxman, F.S., Perdoni, M.L., & Harrison, L.D. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 239-254.
41.
Townsend, W.A. (2004). Systems changes associated with criminal justice treatment networks. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 607-621.
