A sex offender program delivered in a medium-security prison followed 109 treatment completers and 37 noncompleters for 2 years after release. Noncompleters, those who refused treatment or dropped out, had 6 times the rate of sexual and violent reoffending relative to completers. Among those who completed the program, however, positive evaluations of treatment change, such as quality of disclosure and enhanced victim empathy, found in posttreatment assessments did not correlate with recidivism. Furthermore, completers did not differ in their rates of recidivism from pretreatment rates predicted by the Static 99, an actuarial measure of anticipated sexual and violent recidivism. We conclude that the programdid not influence propensities for sexual and violent recidivism but rather served as a prolonged screening instrument for sex offenders whose failure to comply with treatment attendance predicted higher rates of recidivism.
Alexander, M. A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116.
2.
Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M.,& Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
3.
Boe, R., Motiuk, L.,& Muirhead, M. (1998). Recent trends and patterns shaping the corrections population in Canada: 1983/84 to 1996/97(Research Brief, B-21). Ottawa, Canada: Solicitor General.
4.
Corrections and Conditional Release Act of 1992, Canada. 129:2ai (1998).
5.
Friendship, C., Falshaw, L.,& Beech, A. R. (2003). Measuring the real impact of accredited offending behaviour programmes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 115-127.
6.
Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 744-759.
7.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). How to know what works with sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 129-145.
8.
Hanson, R. K.,& Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: Ameta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
9.
Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
10.
Hanson, R. K.,& Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
11.
Hall, G. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809.
12.
Looman, J., Abrachen, J., & Nicholaichuk, T. P. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 279-290.
13.
Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment, and theorizing about sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 162-199.
14.
Marshall, W. L. (1999). Current status of North American assessment and treatment programs for sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 221-239.
15.
Marques, J., Nelson, C., West, M. A., & Day, D. M. (1994). The relationship between treatment goals and recidivism among child molesters. Behavior Research and Therapy, 5, 577-588.
16.
Marques, J. K. (1999). How to answer the question “Does sex offender treatment work?”Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 437-451.
17.
Matthews, R.,& Pitts, J. (1998). Rehabilitation, recidivism and realism: evaluating violence reduction programs in prison. Prison Journal, 78, 390-405.
18.
McConaghy, N. (1999). Methodological issues concerning evaluation of treatment for sexual offenders: Randomization, treatment dropouts, untreated controls, and within-treatment studies. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 183-193.
19.
Miner, M. H. (1997). How can we conduct treatment outcome research?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 95-110.
20.
Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D.,& Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 139-153.
21.
Nicholaichuk, T. P. (1996). A comparison of sex offender treatment outcomes among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders. Paper presented at the Aboriginal Sex Offender Corrections and Treatment Conference, Winnipeg, Canada. Cited in Looman, J., Abrachen, J., &Nicholaichuk, T. P. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 279-290.
22.
Polizzi, D. M., MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison and non-prison based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357-374.
23.
Quinsey, V. L. (1998). Comment on Marshall’s “Monster, victim, or everyman.”Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 65-60.
24.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E.,& LaLumiere, M. L. (1993). Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 512-523.
25.
Quinsey, V. L., LaLumiere, M. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Predicting sexual offences. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.) Assessing dangerousness: Potential for further violence of sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers(pp. 114-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Seto, M. C., & Barbaree, H. E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1235-1248.
27.
Struder, L. H., Reddon, J. R., Roper, V., & Estrada, L. (1996). Phoenix: An in-hospital treatment program for sex offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 23, 91-97.
28.
Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (1998). The construction and development of theory in the sex offending area: Ametatheoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: AJournal of Research andTreatment, 10, 47-63.
