Practical learning of digital technology is an important component of advanced mechanical engineering courses. However, to effectively conduct this course, real case study experience is essential. To reach this objective, this study proposes a practical learning project on development of digital twin-based robotic arm platform. This study decomposes the digital twin-based robotic arm platform into several parts applicable for collaboration. By developing this platform, it is possible to comprehend the capabilities and constraints of digital technologies (e.g., 3D modeling, virtual interaction, information communication, and so on) and to establish an environment of collaborative learning. A general schedule is presented for developing a digital twin-based robotic arm platform towards an industrial work cell within twelve weeks. The findings reveal that in addition to significantly improving trainees’ knowledge and practical skills in the application of digital tools, the collaborative learning atmosphere created by the course also contributes to the learners’ achievements.
LeeHYangH. Digital twin simulation and optimization of manufacturing process flows. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2023 18th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 12-16 June 2023: 1-12.
LoCKChenCHZhangRY. A review of digital twin in product design and development. Adv Eng Inf2021; 48: 101297.
5.
DarabaDPopFDarabaC. Digital twin used in real-time monitoring of operations performed on CNC technological equipment. Appl Sci|31922024; 14: 10088.
6.
FangWChenWLovePED, et al.A status digital twin approach for physically monitoring over-and-under excavation in large tunnel. Adv Eng Inf2024; 62: 102648.
7.
YinHZWangL. Application and development prospect of digital twin technology in aerospace. IFAC-PapersOnLine2020; 53: 732–737.
ZouPXWMaS. How digital twin technology may improve safety management: A multi-industry perspective. Saf Sci2025; 189: 106837.
10.
ZioEMiquelesL. Digital twins safety analysis, risk assessment and emergency management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2024; 246: 110040.
11.
HeeneyMAndroutsopoulosKRaimondiF. Implementing a digital twin for a robotic platform to support large-scale coding classes. In: 5th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2024), Lisbon, Portugal. 27-28 June 2024, 122: 1-12.
12.
XuHZhengYLiangJS. A VR-based wiring learning platform for promoting practice experience of electrical engineering. Comput Appl Eng Educ2024; 32: e22704.
13.
SorayaIkhsanJGunturMIS, et al.Assessing chemistry virtual laboratory and its impact in the learning process. In: ICEMT ‘23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, Tokyo, Japan. 29-31 August 2023: 230-235.
14.
Vásquez-CarbonellM. A systematic literature review of augmented reality in engineering education: Hardware, software, student motivation & development recommendations. Digital Education Review2022; 41: 249–267.
15.
Botín-SanabriaDMMihaitaASPeimbert-GarcíaRE, et al.Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sens (Basel)2022; 14: 1335.
16.
TahmasebiniaFLinLWuS, et al.Exploring the benefits and limitations of digital twin technology in building energy. Appl Sci2023; 13: 8814.
17.
YaoJFYangYWangXC, et al.Systematic review of digital twin technology and applications, visual computing for industry. Biomedicine, and Art2023; 6: 10.
18.
BiesingerFWeyrichM. The facets of digital twins in production and the automotive industry. In: 2019 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics Technology (ICMT), Salerno, Italy, 23-26 October 2019: 1-6.
19.
PiromalisDKantarosA. Digital twins in the automotive industry: The road toward physical-digital convergence. Applied System Innovation2022; 5: 65.
20.
HosamoHHNielsenHKAlnmrAN, et al.A review of the digital twin technology for fault detection in buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment2022; 8: 1013196.
21.
PantusinFJOrtizJSCarvajalCP, et al.Digital twin integration for active learning in robotic manipulator control within engineering 4.0. Symmetry (Basel)2025; 17: 1638.
22.
CañasJMPerdicesEGarcía-PérezL, et al.A ROS-based open tool for intelligent robotics education. Appl Sci2020; 10: 7419.
23.
SteinGJeanDKittaniS, et al.A novice-friendly and accessible networked educational robotics simulation platform. Education Sciences2025; 15: 198.
24.
AntunesRNunesLAguiarML, et al.A laboratory-based multidisciplinary approach for effective education and training in industrial collaborative robotics. Laboratories2024; 1: 34–51.
25.
TselegkaridisSSapounidisT. Simulators in educational robotics: A review. Education Sciences2021; 11: 11.
26.
CamargoCGonçalvesJCondeMÁ, et al.Systematic literature review of realistic simulators applied in educational robotics context. Sensors2021; 21: 4031.
27.
JuanateyDNayaMBaamondeT, et al.Developing a simulation model for autonomous driving education in the robobo SmartCity framework. Engineering Proceedings2021; 7: 49.
28.
BiesingerFWeyrichM. The facets of digital twins in production and the automotive industry. In: 2019 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics Technology (ICMT), Salerno, Italy, 23-26 October 2019: 1-6.
29.
AruannoBTamburrinoFNeriP, et al.Virtual reality laboratory for engineering and material science immersive learning. Comput Appl Eng Educ2025; 33: e70041.
30.
MuzataARSinghGStepanovMS, et al.Immersive learning: A systematic literature review on transforming engineering education through virtual reality. Virtual Worlds2024; 3: 480–505.
31.
RossetoAGdMMartinsTCSilvaLA, et al.An analysis of the use of augmented reality and virtual reality as educational resources. Comput Appl Eng Educ2023; 31: 1761–1775.
32.
AbotalebIHosnyONassarK, et al.An interactive virtual reality model for enhancing safety training in construction education. Comput Appl Eng Educ2022; 31: 324–345.
33.
LiangJS. Instructing an on-line VR-based written test system design and construction in multimedia practice course. Comput Appl Eng Educ2014; 22: 349–363.
34.
SayBErdenZTurhanC. A team-oriented course development experience in distance education for multidisciplinary engineering design. Comput Appl Eng Educ2022; 30: 1617–1640.
35.
RiajiTEI HassaniSAlaouiFEM. Enhancing engineering education through virtual reality: A systematic study on immersive engineering education practices. Int J Electr Comput Eng2025; 15: 1889–1899.
36.
NezziCGuflerVVidoniR, et al.Kinematic and dynamic modeling of mechanical systems towards digital twins. Results in Engineering2025; 26: 104874.
37.
MirriSRoccettiMSalomoniP. Collaborative design of software applications: The role of users. Hum-centric Comput Inf Sci2018; 8: 1–20.
38.
XuHZhengYLiangJS. Evaluation of an immersive VR-based chemical production safety learning using a transferable psychosomatic approach. Int J Eng Educ2023; 39: 777–797.
39.
ZhangMAntwi-AfariMFWangC, et al.Development projects: A review of causes, types, challenges and future research directions. Systems2025; 13: 650.
40.
JiangSTatarCHuangX, et al.Augmented reality in science laboratories: Investigating high school students’ navigation patterns and their effects on learning performance. J Educ Comput Res2021; 60: 777–803.
41.
KumarVVCarberryDBeenfeldtC, et al.Virtual reality in chemical and biochemical engineering education and training. Educ Chem Eng2021; 36: 143–153.
42.
WangTLTsengYK. The effects of visualization format and spatial ability on learning star motions. J Comput Assist Learn2020; 36: 61–69.
43.
OuyangSGWangGYaoJY, et al.A Unity3D-based interactive three-dimensional virtual practice platform for chemical engineering. Comput Appl Eng Educ2018; 26: 91–100.
44.
AaranamSAKHartmanNW. A systematic review of digital twin and virtual learning environments for smart manufacturing education. Manuf Lett2025; 44: 1597–1608.
