Greek engineering students’ views of the nature of engineering

Abstract

Nowadays demands on scientific literacy consider nature of engineering as crucial, introducing the scientific and ontological foundations of engineering. As a result, this study was conducted to examine the students’ views on nature of engineering at the Materials Science and Engineering department at University of Ioannina, through the views of first- and fifth-year students. 145 students participated in this research, 75 first-year and 70 graduate students. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire with open-ended questions that required scientific knowledge, regarding Engineering and Science. After the collection of the questionnaires, statistical processing was carried out regarding the first and the last year student's views, as well as the prospective change of their views during the years of their study. The results of the study revealed that first-year students had already a formed view of engineering; however, their answers tended to be numerous, short and generally formulated, while a complete lack of knowledge on technical engineering issues was observed. At the same time, in elaborated questions that sought to explore their beliefs about nature of engineering, the students’ views were simple, vague, scientifically naive and in some cases non-existent. On the contrary, the fifth-year students seemed to have sufficient and satisfactory knowledge of the cognitive subject, with much more accurate and scientifically correct opinions, mainly regarding technical issues. However, their responses regarding nature of engineering simulated the first-year students, where it was found that the level of assimilation concerning nature of engineering is equally low.

Keywords

Nature of engineering nature of science scientific literacy engineering students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burns

O’Connor

Stocklmayer

SM.

Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Underst Sci 2003; 12: 183–202.

Roberts

DA.

Scientific literacy/science literacy. In: Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2013, pp. 743–794.

Khine

MS.

Nature of science in school science textbooks. Sci Educ 2019; 28: 599–601.

Herman

BC.

Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. J Res Sci Teach 2018; 55: 600–638.

Erdas Kartal

Cobern

Dogan

, et al. Improving science teachers’ nature of science views through an innovative continuing professional development program. Int J STEM Educ 2018; 5: 30.

Al Sultan

Henson

Jr Fadde

. Pre-Service elementary Teachers’ scientific literacy and self-efficacy in teaching science. IAFOR J Educ 2018; 6: 25–41.

Suwono

Maulidia

Saefi

, et al. The development and validation of an instrument of prospective science Teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy. EURASIA J Math Sci Technol Educ 2022; 18: em2068.

Yao

J-X

Guo

Y-Y.

Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. Int J Sci Educ 2018; 40: 1913–1933.

Vieira

Tenreiro-Vieira

Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. Int J Sci Math Educ 2016; 14: 659–680.

10.

Stylos

Siarka

Kotsis

KT.

Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy. Eur J Sci Math Educ 2023; 11: 271–282.

11.

Aikenhead

GS.

Collective decision making in the social context of science. Sci Educ 1985; 69: 453–475.

12.

Kolstø

SD.

Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Sci Educ 2001; 85: 291–310.

13.

Olson

JK.

The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Sci Educ 2018; 27: 637–660.

14.

Clough

MP.

Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Sci Educ 2018; 27: 1–5.

15.

Antink-Meyer

Brown

RA.

Nature of engineering knowledge. Sci Educ 2019; 28: 539–559.

16.

Karataş

FÖ

Bodner

Unal

First-year engineering students’ views of the nature of engineering: Implications for engineering programmes. Eur J Eng Educ 2016; 41: 1–22.

17.

Karatas

Micklos

Bodner

GM.

Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. J Sci Educ Technol 2011; 20: 123–135.

18.

Pleasants

Olson

JK.

What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K-12 education. Sci Educ 2019; 103: 145–166.

19.

Petrova

Fachikov

Hristov

The magnetite as adsorbent for some hazardous species from aqueous solutions: A review. Int Rev Chem Eng 2011; 3: 134–152.

20.

van de Poel

. Philosophy and engineering: Setting the stage. In: Philosophy and engineering. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 1–11.

21.

Becker

FS.

Why don’t young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions. Eur J Eng Educ 2010; 35: 349–366.

22.

Fortenberry

NL.

An extensive agenda for engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education 2006; 95: 3–5.

23.

Fromm

The changing engineering educational paradigm. J Eng Educ 2003; 92: 113–121.

24.

Guest

Lifelong learning for engineers: A global perspective. Eur J Eng Educ 2006; 31: 273–281.

25.

Splitt

. The challenge to change: On realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. J Eng Educ 2003; 92: 181–187.

26.

Shane

. Hermeneutics and the meaning of understanding. In: Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007, pp.108–121.

27.

Akerlind

Bowden

Green

Learning to do phenomenography: A reflective discussion. In: Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press, 2005, 74–100.

28.

Driver

Leach

Millar

Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, Open University Press, UK: McGraw-Hill Education, 1996.

29.

Adams

CC.

Engineering students. Lib Educ Twenty-First Century Eng Responses to ABET/EC 2000 Criteria 2004; 23: 91.

30.

Rogers

GFC.

The nature of engineering: a philosophy of technology. London, UK: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1983.

31.

Calderhead

Robson

Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early conceptions of classroom practice. Teach Teach Educ 1991; 7: 1–8.

32.

Weinstein

CS.

Prospective elementary teachers’ beliefs about teaching: Implications for teacher education. Teach Teach Educ 1990; 6: 279–290.

33.

Lederman

NG.

Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 1992; 29: 331–359.

34.

Lythcott

Duschl

Qualitative research: From methods to conclusions.

35.

Dym

CL.

Learning engineering: Design, languages, and experiences. J Eng Educ 1999; 88: 145–148.

36.

Lewin

Engineering philosophy—the third culture?

Leonardo 1983; 16: 127–132.

37.

Bodner

GM.

Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. J Chem Educ 1986; 63: 873.

38.

Bransford

Brown

Cocking

RR.

How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

39.

Hewson

PW.

Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. J Res Sci Teach 1983; 20: 731–743.

40.

Perkins

Adams

Pollock

, et al. Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado learning attitudes about science survey. In: AIP Conference proceedings. American institute of physics, 2005, pp. 61–64.

41.

Stathopoulou

Vosniadou

Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemp Educ Psychol 2007; 32: 255–281.

42.

Alpay

Student attraction to engineering through flexibility and breadth in the curriculum. Eur J Eng Educ 2013; 38: 58–69.