Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-4
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to improve collaborative project-based learning: Case study of a Study and Research Path in mechanical engineering
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a powerful quality tool, widely used in industry, for the identification of failure modes, their effects and causes. In this work, we investigated the utility of FMEA in the education field to improve active learning processes. In our case study, the FMEA principles were adapted to assess the risk of failures in a Mechanical Engineering course on “Theory of Machines and Mechanisms” conducted through a project-based, collaborative “Study and Research Path (SRP)” methodology. The SRP is an active learning instruction format which is initiated by a generating question that leads to a sequence of derived questions and answers, and combines moments of study and inquiry. By applying the FMEA, the teaching team was able to identify the most critical failures of the process, and implement corrective actions to improve the SRP in the subsequent year. Thus, our work shows that FMEA represents a simple tool of risk assesment which can serve to identify criticality in educational process, and improve the quality of active learning.
RugarciaAFelderRMWoodsDR.The future of engineering education I: a vision for a new century. Chem Eng Educ2000;
34: 16–25.
2.
PrinceM.Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ2004;
93: 223–232.
3.
de DuXDe GraaffEKolmosA (eds) Research on PPL practice in engineering education.
Rotterdam:
Sense Publishers, 2009.
4.
GrimsonJ.Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. Eur J Eng Educ2002;
27: 31–37.
5.
ChandrasekaranSStojcevskiALittlefairG, et al. Learning through projects in engineering education. In: SEFI 2012: engineering education 2020: meet the future. Proceedings of the 40th annual conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 23-26 September 2012,, 2012, p. 8. Brussels, Belgium: SEFI.
6.
van Hattum-JansenNVasconcelosRM.Project led education in engineering courses. In: International conference on engineering education,
Coimbra,
Portugal, 3-7 September, 2007.
7.
CamposLCde DiraniEATManriqueAL.2012. Challenges of the implementation of an engineering course in problem based learning. In: de Campos LC, Dirani EAT, Manrique AL, et al. (eds) Project approaches to learning in engineering education: the practice of teamwork. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 5–14.
8.
BarqueroBBoschMGasconJ.2008. Using research and study courses for teaching mathematical modelling at university level. In: Fifth congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education, Vol. 5. Larnaca: University of Cyprus, pp. 2050–2059.
9.
FlorensaGBarqueroBBoschM, et al. Study and research paths at university level: managing, analysing and institutionalizing knowledge. In: Eleventh congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education, Utrecht, Netherlands, February 2019, HAL arcvhives oubertes, p. 02422617.
10.
ChevallardY. Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: a case for an oncoming counter paradigm. In: Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, Seoul, 2015, pp.173–187. Netherlands: S. I. Publishing.
11.
BoschMFlorensaIGascónJ.Study and research paths in university mathematics teaching and in teacher education: open issues at the edge between epistemology and didactics. KHDM Report, Kassel, Germany, 2015, pp. 1–4.
12.
SriramanBEnglishLD. Surveying theories and philosophies of mathematics education. In: Sriraman B and English LD (eds) Theories of mathematics education. Berlin: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 7–32.
13.
BartoloméEFlorensaIBoschM, et al.
Study and research paths enriching the learning of mechanical engineering. Eur J Eng Educ2019;
44: 330–346.
14.
FlorensaIBoschMGascónJ, et al.
Study and research paths: a new tool for design and management of project based learning in engineering. Int J Eng Educ2018;
34: 1848–1862.
15.
BartoloméERueteR.Study and research path multi-approach learning of theory of machines and mechanisms. Eur J Eng Educ2021;
45: 985–1001.
16.
FlorensaI.Contributions of the epistemological and didactic analysis: question-answer maps in engineering and in teacher education. Spain: Universitat Ramon Llull, 2018.
17.
WinsløwCMatheronYMercierA.Study and research courses as an epistemological model for didactics. Educ Stud Math2013;
83: 267–284.
18.
BartoloméEFlorensaIBoschI.Teaching strengths of materials through study and research paths: invariants and differences. Int J Eng Educ2021;
37: 446–460
19.
BarqueroBBoschM. Didactic engineering as a research methodology: from fundamental situations to study and research paths. In: Watson A and Ohtani M (eds) Task design in mathematics education – ICMI study, Vol. 22. Berlin: Springer I, 2013, pp. 249–273.
20.
BarqueroBBoschMGascónJ.The ecological dimension in teaching of mathematical modelling at university. Rech Didact Math2013;
33: 307–338.
21.
GascónJ.The three fundamental problems of a didactic problem: the case of analytical algebra. Rev Latinoamericana Invest Mat Educ2011;
14: 203–231.
22.
Buljubašić-Kuzmanović SenkaVGazibaraG. Evaluation of active learning in higher education teaching. In: Blazic M (ed.) Didactica slovenica. Novo mesto: Tiskarna Cicero, Beguanje, 2016, pp.118–129.
23.
LantadaADLafont MorgadoPMunoz-GuijosaJM, et al.
Towards successful project-based teaching-learning experiences in engineering education. Int J Eng Educ2013;
29: 1–15.
24.
DillR, et al. State of the art reliability estimate of saturn V propulsion systems. RM 63TMP-22, General Electric Company, 1963.
25.
DraganPTodorovićMMladenovićS, et al.
The role of quality methods in improving education process: case study. Serbian J Manage2014;
9: 219–230.
26.
MazumderQH. Applying six sigma in higher education quality improvement. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 2014.
27.
KruegerD. Process integration and improvement in a higher education institution in South Africa. In: Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET), Portland,2015, pp.1424–1432.
28.
SinthavalaiRMemongkolN. A case of FMEA implementation in the educational sector and integration with CRM and QFD concepts. In: IEEE international engineering management conference, Estoril, Portugal, 2008.
29.
Dieste-VelascoMIDiez-MediavillaMAlonso-TristánC, et al. Analysis of teaching methodologies based on active learning by means of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats matrix. In: 8th international conference of education, research and innovation, ICERI-2015, Sevilla, Spain, 2015, pp. 5862–5866.
30.
HandeS.Strengths weaknesses opportunities and threats of blended learning: students’ perceptions. Ann Med Health Sci Res2014;
4: 336–339.
31.
Dieste-VelascoMIGonzález-PeñaDGarcía-CalderónT, et al. Design of an assessment method based on competences by strategic analysis tools for subjects of industrial engineering degree. In 9th international conference of education, research and innovation, ICERI-2016, Sevilla, Spain, 2016, pp. 90–95.
32.
Rodríguez-AmigoCGarcía-CalderónTDieste-VelascoMI, et al. Review of evaluation systems in industrial engineering subjects by means of strategic analysis tools at Burgos University. In: 8th International conference on education and new learning technologies, EDULEARN-2016, Barcelona, Spain, 2016, pp. 1397–1404.
33.
StamatisDH.Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: Q. P. Ed. ASQC, 1995.
34.
LiuHChen ChenXQDuanCY, et al.
Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind Eng2019;
135: 881–897.
35.
NealRA. Modes of failure analysis summary for the Nerva B-2 reactor. WANL-TNR-042, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Astronuclear Laboratory, 1962.
36.
VinodhSSanthoshD.Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization. TQM J2011;
24: 260–274.
37.
SegismundoAMiguelPAC.Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in the context of risk management in new product development: a case study in an automotive company. Int J Qual Reliab Manage2008;
25: 899–912.
38.
SerafiniATroianoGFranceschiniE, et al.
Use of a systematic risk analysis method (FMECA) to improve quality in a clinical laboratory procedure. Ann Ig2016;
28: 288–295.
39.
AlbaMSanchez HurtadoFSanchez MargalloMA, et al.
Application of failure mode and effect analysis in laparoscopic colon surgery training. World J Surg2015;
39: 536–542.
HąbekPMolendaM. Using the FMEA method as a support for improving the social responsibility of a company. In: ICORES 2017 – Proceedings of the 6th international conference on operations research and enterprise systems,
2017-Janua (ICORES), 2017, pp. 57–65.
42.
SilvaMMDe GusmãoAPHPoletoT, et al.
A multidimensional approach to information security risk management using FMEA and fuzzy theory. Int J Inform Manage2014;
34: 733–740.
43.
GursesAPDietzASNowakowskiE, et al.
Human factors-based risk analysis to improve the safety of doffing enhanced personal protective equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2019;
40: 178–186.
44.
HariR.Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) ok knowledge management and achievement of prospective teachers. Global J Res Anal2015;
4: 330–332.
45.
BoylanF. Introducing the failure mode effects reflective analysis technique for the field of higher education and research. In: International conference on education and new learning technologies, Barcelona, Spain, 4-6 July 2011.
46.
Alonso-TristánCDieste-VelascoMIDiez-MediavillaM, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis to asses the acquisition of competences in higher education engineering: a case study at Burgos University. In: Proceedings of ICERI2017 conference, , Seville, Spain, 16–18 November 2017, pp. 3491–3498.
47.
HaghshenasH.Improvements in teaching projection theory. Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). J Eng Appl Sci2016;
11: 37–42.
48.
FlyvbjergB. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, et al. (eds) Qualitative research practice. 2004, pp. 420–434. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
YinRK.Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014, p. 282.
50.
DemingWE.Elementary principles of the statistical control of quality.
Tokyo:
JUSE, 1950.
BluvbandZGrabovPNakarO. Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). In: Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability (RAMS), 2004, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2004, pp. 31–36.
53.
ZhaoYFuGWanB, et al. An improved cost-based risk priority number method. In: Proceedings of IEEE Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Beijing), China, 2012, pp. 1–4.
54.
CatelaniMCianiLGalarD, et al.
Risk assessment of a wind turbine: a new FMECA-based tool with RPN threshold estimation. IEEE Access2020;
8: 20181–20190.
55.
Vázquez-ValenciaASantiago-SáezAPerea-PérezB, et al.
Usefulness of failure mode and effects analysis for improving mobilization safety in critically ill patients. Colomb Anestesiol2018;
46: 3–10.
56.
FordECGaudetteRMyersL, et al.
Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2009;
74: 852–858.
57.
DuicuSDumitrascuA-E. Researches concerning risk assessing using Pareto diagram for design process of technological processes. In: GAVTASC'11: Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, Computational Geometry and Artificial Vision, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, August 2011, pp. 189–192.
58.
IadanzaEPennatiDManettiL, et al. FMECA design analysis: risk management for the manufacture of a CBCT scanner. IEEE Access2019;
7: 181546–181564.
59.
LiuHCLiuLLiuN.Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl2013;
40: 828–838.
60.
LeeHLeeHBaikJ, et al.
Failure mode and effects analysis drastically reduced potential risks in clinical trial conduct. Drug Des Devel Ther2017;
11: 3035–3043.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
