Online forums: A tool to enhance experimental engineering laboratories

Abstract

Asynchronous discussion forums were implemented as an e-learning tool to enhance the teaching of principles in materials science for first year undergraduate students in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Time in the laboratory is restricted and therefore only one experiment can be achieved in the class. Asynchronous discussion forums were used as means of enhancing content, extending student participation and facilitating student discussion subsequent to the laboratory session. From online feedback surveys, conducted at different stages throughout the class, results showed 60% of the students had never used online forums before, 96% of the students engaged in the activity and 80% of the students agreed that online forums are an alternative platform to use to discuss and compare results when time in the laboratory is restricted. The implementations of asynchronous discussion forum encouraged students to conduct deep learning in order to enhance the discussion thread they were involved.

Keywords

Asynchronous discussion forum experimental laboratory first year undergraduate teaching learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Konak

Clark

T and

Nasereddin

Using Kolb’s experiential learning cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Comput Educ 2014; 72: 11–22.

Marton

Säljö

On qualitative differences in learning – I: outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol 1976; 46: 4–11.

Anon. http://c4lpt.co.uk/directory-of-learning-performance-tools/ (2005, accessed 18 August 2015).

Bach Shirley, Haynes Philip and Lewis Smith Jennifer. (2007). “Online Learning and Teaching in Higher Education”. Open University Press. McGraw Hill.

Graham

Allen

Ure

Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In: Khosrow-Pour

(ed) Encyclopedia of information science and technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 2005, pp.253–259.

Osguthorpe

Graham

CR.

Blended learning systems: definitions and directions. Q Rev Dis Educ 2003; 4: 227–234.

McKenzie

Perini

Rohlf

et al . A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Comput Educ 2013; 64: 116–126.

Desanctis

Fayard

Roach

et al . Learning in online forums. Eur Manag J 2003; 21: 565–577.

Kim

Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Comput Educ 2013; 62: 123–129.

10.

Sendra-Portero

Torales-Chaparro

Ruiz-Gómez

et al . A pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual lectures for undergraduate radiology teaching. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 888–893.

11.

Andresen

MA.

Asynchronous discussion forums: success factors, outcomes, assessments and limitations. Educ Technol Soc 2009; 12: 249–257.

12.

Gilboy

Heinerichs

Pazzaglia

Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. J Nutr Educ Behav 2015; 47: 109–114.

13.

Ecclestone

Learning outcomes. Sheffield: Centre for Further and Higher Education, Sheffield Hallam University, 1995.

14.

Gikandi

Morrow

Davis

NE.

online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Comput Educ 2011; 57: 2333–2351.

15.

Challis

Committing to quality learning through adaptive online assessment. Assess Eval High Educ 2005; 30: 519–527.

16.

Oosterhof

Conrad

Ely

DP.

Assessing learners online. New Jersey: Pearson, 2008.

17.

Einig

Supporting students’ learning: the use of formative online assessments. Account Educ Int J 2013; 22: 425–444.

18.

Analyticstool.com. Survey question types and survey structure web-based survey software, www.analyticstool.com/survey-question-types-and-survey-structure/ (2014).