Abstract
This article examines migrant agricultural labour in southern Italy as a concentrated site of contemporary extractive capitalism. Focusing on the 2011 strike of migrant workers in Nardò (Apulia) and the subsequent Sabr trial, it argues that labour exploitation in European agriculture is not a marginal deviation or the result of criminal excess, but a structurally organised regime sustained through migration control, labour flexibilisation and territorial governance. Situating the case within the framework of racial capitalism and state-mediated extraction, the article conceptualises Europe as a space of internal frontiers, where incorporation into production is systematically coupled with precarious legal and political membership. The Nardò strike exposed the racialised foundations of agricultural production, while the Sabr trial translated structural exploitation into individualised criminal responsibility. Together, they illuminate the dialectic between conflict and legality through which extractive labour regimes are both challenged and stabilised. By foregrounding the legal and institutional production of vulnerability, the article contributes to a critical understanding of how democratic legality coexists with, and mediates, extractive accumulation in contemporary Europe.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
H. Bernstein, Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change (Kumarian Press, 2010); P. McMichael, Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions (Fernwood Publishing, 2013); P. McMichael, The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems (New York: Cornell University Press, 1994); P. McMichael, “Reframing development: Global peasant movements and the new agrarian question,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27, no. 4 (2006): 471–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2006.9669169; F. Araghi, “Accumulation by displacement: Global enclosures, food crisis, and the ecological contradictions of capitalism,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 32.1 (2009): 113–46, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40647791.pdf; D. Burch and G. Lawrence, eds., Supermarkets and Agri-food Supply Chains: Transformations in the production and consumption of foods (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007); P. McMichael, “Value-chain agriculture and debt relations: Contradictory outcomes,” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 4 (2013): 671–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.786290.
2.
D. Harvey, The New Imperialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003); D. Harvey, Marx, Capital and the Madness of Economic Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017); N. Fraser, Cannibal Capitalism (London: Verso, 2022).
3.
C. J. Robinson, Black Marxism: The making of the Black radical tradition (London: Zed Books, 1983); J. Melamed, Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011); J. Melamed, “Racial capitalism,” Critical Ethnic Studies 1, no. 1 (2015): 76–85, https://doi.org/10.5749/jcritethnstud.1.1.0076; G. Bhattacharyya, Rethinking Racial Capitalism: Questions of reproduction and survival (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018).
4.
The notion of a ‘colour line’, originally formulated by W. E. B. Du Bois, is used here not as an identity-based category but as a structural principle organising the unequal distribution of rights, protection and vulnerability within labour markets. In contemporary Europe, this line operates through legal status, differential access to welfare and regimes of deportability, producing a racialised division of labour central to extractive accumulation. See W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880 (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935).
5.
É. Balibar and I. Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous identities (London: Verso, 1991); É. Balibar, “Il ritorno della razza: tra società e istituzioni,” in Il rovescio dei diritti umani. Razza, discriminazione, schiavitù , ed. T. Casadei (Bologna: DeriveApprodi, 2016); S. Mezzadra and B. Neilson, Borders as Method, or the Multiplication of Labor (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013); N. De Genova, The Borders of Europe: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017).
6.
N. Poulantzas, State, Power, Socialism (London: Verso, 1978); B. Jessop, “Cultural political economy and critical policy studies,” Critical Policy Studies 3, nos. 3–4 (2009): 336–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619741; C. Menjívar and L. Abrego, “Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants,” American Journal of Sociology 117, no. 5 (2012): 1380–421, https://doi.org/10.1086/663575; J. Simon, Governing Through Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007); F. de Nardis, “Reclaiming conflict: Towards a sociological critique of democratic law in the neoliberal conjuncture,” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (2026), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10425-w.
7.
N. De Genova, Working the Boundaries: Race, space and “illegality” in Mexican Chicago (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005); N. De Genova, “Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scenes of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36, no. 7 (2013): 1180–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710; D. T. Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).
8.
S. Sassen, Guests and Aliens (New York: The New Press, 1999); S. Sassen, Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014); M. Ruhs, The Price of Rights: Regulating international labor migration (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).
9.
G. Mottura and E. Pugliese, Agricoltura, mezzogiorno e mercato del lavoro (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1975); E. Pugliese, “Il lavoro agricolo dell’immigrato nel Mezzogiorno e il caso di Rosarno,” Mondi Migranti 3 (2012): 7–28, https://doi.org/10.3280/MM2012-003001; P. Basso and F. Perocco, “Gli immigrati in Europa,” in Gli immigrati in Europa. Disuguaglianze, razzismo, lotte , ed. P. Basso and F. Perocco (Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2003); D. Perrotta, “Ben oltre lo sfruttamento: lavorare da migranti in agricoltura,” il Mulino 63, no. 1 (2014): 29–37; J. Gertel and S. R. Sippel, eds., Seasonal Workers in Mediterranean Agriculture: The social costs of eating fresh (London: Routledge, 2014).
10.
J.-P. Berlan, “La longue histoire du modèle californien,” in Le goût amer de nos fruits et légumes. L’exploitation des migrants dans l’agriculture intensive en Europe , Forum Civique Européen, Informations et Commentaires (Bruxelles: 2002): 15–22.
11.
D. Perrotta and D. Sacchetto, “Il ghetto e lo sciopero: braccianti stranieri nell’Italia meridionale,” Sociologia del lavoro 128 (2012): 152–66, https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2012-128010; A. Corrado, C. de Castro and D. Perrotta, Migration and Agriculture: Mobility and change in the Mediterranean area (London: Routledge, 2017).
12.
At the time of the strike, Masseria Boncuri – a historic farmhouse on the outskirts of Nardò – was semi-abandoned and had become an informal site of worker concentration. In the years that followed, partly as a result of the mobilisation itself, it was transformed into a regional seasonal workers’ hostel, intended to provide regulated accommodation, employment orientation and an institutional alternative to gangmaster-mediated labour recruitment.
13.
Unless otherwise indicated, the interview excerpts cited below derive from field notes, in-depth interviews and conversations conducted in the summer of 2011 as part of a broader ethnographic study carried out between 2010 and 2015.
14.
N. Dines and E. Rigo, “Postcolonial citizenships and the ‘refugeeization’ of the workforce: Migrant agricultural labor in the Italian Mezzogiorno,” in Postcolonial Transitions in Europe: Contexts, practices and politics, edited by S. Ponzanesi and G. Colpani (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015).
15.
R. Cillo and F. Perocco, Lavoro forzato e immigrati in Italia (Padova: Cluep, 2012); A. Tassinari and V. Maccarrone, “Riders on the Storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK,” Work, Employment and Society 34, no. 1 (2020): 35–54, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954.
16.
This is a two-stage procurement procedure used by large-scale retail distribution (GDO), in which suppliers are required to submit progressively lower bids against a base price. This mechanism results in a sharp reduction in farm-gate prices, which is often passed on to labour costs. F. Ciconte, L’ipocrisia dell’abbondanza. Perché non compreremo più cibo a basso costo (Roma: Laterza, 2023).
17.
A. Ciniero, “Ethnography of exploitation in seasonal agricultural labor: The case of Bulgarian Roma laborers in Apulia, Southern Italy,” Sociologia del Lavoro , no. 168 (2024): 204–23, https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2024-168010.
18.
M. Atzeni, “Workers’ organizations and the fetishism of the trade union form: Toward new pathways for research on the labour movement?” Globalizations 18, no. 8 (2021): 1349–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1877970.
19.
F. Caruso, A. Corrado, M. Fama and M. Pullano, Le iniziative e i progetti in agricoltura per il rispetto dei diritti dei lavoratori migranti (Research report, Università della Calabria 2021), https://www.cric.it/images/stories/OpenFields/rapporto_iniziative.pdf (accessed 15 February 2025).
20.
D. Perrotta, “7 gennaio 2010: Rosarno,” Il Mulino , January 7, 2010, https://www.rivistailmulino.it/a/7-gennaio-2010 (accessed 15 February 2025).
21.
A. Ciniero, Le politiche dell’esclusione. Centri di accoglienza, ghetti e campi rom in Italia (Milano: Meltemi, 2024).
22.
D. Di Sanzo, Braccia e persone: storia dell’immigrazione in Italia ai tempi di Jerry Masslo (1980–1990) (Torino: Claudiana, 2020).
23.
In 2022, the Court of Cassation reopened the proceedings on charges including forced labour, illegal intermediation, extortion, and facilitation of irregular migration, underscoring the persistence of slavery-like labour relations within European agriculture. Analytically, the trial is significant not merely for its judicial outcome, but for the way in which structural exploitation is translated into individual criminal responsibility, thereby affirming the authority of the legal order while leaving intact the broader regulatory and economic conditions that enable extractive labour regimes – regimes of moral and political governance that recognise suffering while displacing its structural causes, transforming social violence into an object of compassion, management and legal containment rather than political contestation. See D. Fassin, Humanitarian Reason: A moral history of the present (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
24.
On these processes see also F. de Nardis, “The concept of de-politicization and its consequences,” Partecipazione e Conflitto 10, no. 2 (2017): 340–56, https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i2p340; F. de Nardis, Understanding Politics and Society (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020); F. de Nardis, “Emergency politics and de-democratization in the age of authoritarian neoliberalism,” in Democracies on the Move , ed. A. Millefiorini (London: Routledge, 2025).
25.
The legal processing of exploitation should be understood as a modality of depoliticisation rather than as a mere failure of enforcement. By translating structural relations of domination into individual criminal responsibility, the state reasserts its legitimacy while leaving intact the institutional conditions of extraction. This dynamic is central to contemporary forms of democratic legality, in which recognition of abuse coexists with the neutralisation of conflict. See Fassin, Humanitarian Reason ; Simon, Governing Through Crime ; de Nardis, “The concept of de-politicization.”
26.
On the role of criminal law as a technology of governance that manages social conflict by individualising responsibility while leaving structural conditions intact, see Simon, Governing Through Crime .
27.
B. Anderson, “Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers,” Work, Employment and Society 24, no. 2 (2010): 300–317, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010362141; Menjívar and Abrego, “Legal violence”; Mezzadra and Neilson, Borders as Method .
28.
É. Balibar, We, the People of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).
29.
B. J. Silver, Forces of labor. Worker’s movements and Globalization since 1870 (New York: Cambridge University Press); Atzeni, “Workers’ organizations.”
30.
Sassen, Expulsions.