Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
I use the term ‘postcolonial theory’ here to avoid confusion. But my usual practice is to emphasise the debate between Marxism and postmodernism/poststructuralism, so as to not to concede the entire ground of ‘postcolonial studies’ – a very productive space for discussing postcolonial literature, history and society – to the postmodernists. Cf. Pranav Jani, ‘Marxism and the future of postcolonial theory’, review of Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital , by Vivek Chibber, International Socialist Review 92 (Spring 2014), pp. 105–21, https://isreview.org/issue/92/marxism-and-future-postcolonial-theory-0/index.html
2.
For an assessment the decades-long discussion see Subir Sinha and Rashmi Varma’s, ‘Marxism and postcolonial theory: what’s left of the debate?’, Critical Sociology (15 December 2017), https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920515616263
3.
Arun Kundnani, ‘On A. Sivanandan’s Communities of Resistance ’, 24 January 2020, https://www.kundnani.org/on-a-sivanandans-communities-of-resistance/
4.
See Tanika Sarkar, Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation: community, religion and cultural nationalism (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2001).
