This introduction to a special section on parliaments identifies a tendency in STS to look for politics either inside or outside mainstream democratic institutions. Summarizing the insights of the contributions to the special section, the introduction argues that – in light of current challenges to dominant modes of doing politics across the globe – the task for STS scholars is neither to renew faith in what is happening in various legislatures, nor to look for alternatives elsewhere. Rather it is to carefully explore how their multiple insides and outsides are being connected, and what possibilities those connections offer as we continue to navigate spaces defined by the panopticon and the parliament as the twin diagrams of modernity.
AsdalKHobækB (2016) Assembling the whale: Parliaments in the politics of nature. Science as Culture25(1): 96–116.
2.
AsdalKHobækB (2020) The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber. Social Studies of Science50(2) 252–270.
3.
BarryA (2020) Afterword: ‘I will play my part’, or parliamentary politics in action. Social Studies of Science50(2) 335–342.
4.
BarryAOsborneTRoseN (1996) Foucault and Political Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BenthamJ (1995) [1787] Panopticon or the inspection house. In: BožovičM (ed.) The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso Books.
6.
BenthamJ (1999) [1791] Essay on Political Tactics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BožovičM (1995) The Panopticon Writings. London and New York: Verso Books.
8.
BraunBWhatmoreS (2010) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
BrichzinJ (2020) Materializations through political work. Social Studies of Science50(2): 271–291.
10.
BrownMB (2015) Politicizing science: Conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Social Studies of Science45(1): 3–30.
11.
CollinsHMEvansR (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science32(2): 235–296.
12.
CreweE (2005) Lords of Parliament. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
13.
CreweE (2015) The House of Commons. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
14.
DányiE (2012) Parliament politics: A material-semiotic analysis of liberal democracy. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
15.
DányiESpencerM (2020) Un/common grounds: Tracing politics across worlds. Social Studies of Science50(2): 317–334.
16.
DeleuzeG (1986) Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
de VriesG (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science37(5): 781–809.
18.
EzrahiY (2012) Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FosterN (2000) Rebuilding the Reichstag. Woodstock: Overlook Press.
20.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (SheridanA trans). London: Penguin Books.
21.
GardeyD (2015) Le Linge Du Palais-Bourbon. Paris: Le Bord de l’Eau.
HarmanG (2014) Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press.
24.
JasanoffS (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on HM Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science33(3): 389–400.
25.
Knorr-CetinaK (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
26.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27.
LatourB (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28.
LatourB (2005) From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public. In: LatourBWeibelP (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 14–31.
29.
LatourB (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard De Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science37(5): 811–820.
30.
LatourBWeibelP (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
LatourBWoolgarS (1986) [1979] Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
LaubeSSchankJSchefferT (2020) Constitutive invisibility: Exploring the invisible work of staff advisers in political position making. Social Studies of Science50(2): 292–316.
LynchM (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
ManowP (2010) In the King’s Shadow. Cambridge: Polity.
36.
MarresN (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science37(5): 759–580.
37.
PalonenK (2012) Parliamentary procedure as an inventory of disputes: A comparison between Jeremy Bentham and Thomas Erskine May. Res Publica Revista De Filosofía Política27: 13–23.
38.
SchofieldP (2006) Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
SchofieldP (2009) Bentham: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.
40.
ShapinSSchafferS (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
WodakR (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
WynneB (2003) Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science33(3): 401–417.
