Land as material,knowledge and relationships: Resource extraction and subsistence imaginaries in Bristol Bay,Alaska

Abstract

This article examines the social, historical and political constitution of land and resource imaginaries in Bristol Bay, Alaska. We compare the dynamics of these different imaginaries in the region within the early permitting debates concerning the proposed Pebble Mine to understand the contemporary politics of defining and constructing ideologies of extractive resource use. We show that the civic epistemologies and ontologies embedded in different social, scientific and political practices help explain environmental actions and outcomes. We demonstrate that the contested fields of social imagination allow for resource exploitation – commodification, extraction and profit – that endangers nature, but also allow for building alternative imaginaries and constructions of land and value as key components of environmental justice and land sovereignty initiatives. Contestations can also highlight problematic and unjust resource practices that disenfranchise and destabilize subordinate industries, poor communities, indigenous lands and subsistence or renewable resource use. These divergent discourses, and the deliberative valuations of alternative futures that they contribute to, are not effectively considered in Alaska’s large mine permitting process.

Keywords

environmental justice indigenous sovereignty land use resource extraction subsistence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agyeman

Schlosberg

Craven

Matthews

(2016) Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 321–340.

Alaska Department of Fish and Game (2017) Anadromous waters catalog. Available at: https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/sf/SARR/AWC/ (accessed 2 March 2017).

Alaska Department of Natural Resources (Division of Mining, Land, and Water, Resource Assessment and Development Section) (2005) Bristol Bay Area Plan for State Lands. Juneau, AK: Alaska Department of Natural Resources.

Barad

(2012) Nature’s queer performativity. Qui Parle 19(2): 121–158.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: SAGE.

Bell

(2016) Determining salmon prices. Alaska Economic Trends: Alaska Department of Labor & Workforce Development 36(11): 5.

Bristol Bay Heritage Land Trust (2013) Citizens Alternative Bristol Bay Area Plan for State Lands. Available at: http://www.bristolbaylandtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/BBAP_May_final.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).

Bureau of Land Management (2018) Alaska federal subsistence. US Department of Interior. Available at: https://www.blm.gov/programs/natural-resources/subsistence (accessed 6 September 2018).

Castoriadis

(1997) Radical imagination and the social instituting imaginary. In: Curtis

(ed.) The Castoriadis Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 319–337.

10.

Cook Inletkeeper (2013) The silencing Alaskans act (HB 77): Anti-salmon, anti-democracy, anti-Alaskan. Available at: https://inletkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Inletkeeper-HB-77-Fact-Sheet.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).

11.

Davidov

(2014) Land, copper, flora: Dominant materialities and the making of Ecuadorian resource environments. Anthropological Quarterly 87(1): 31–58.

12.

Ecology and Environment Inc. (2010) An assessment of ecological risk to wild salmon systems from large-scale mining in the Nushagak and Kvichak Satersheds of the Bristol Bay Basin. Report for the Nature Conservancy, Ecology and Environment Inc, Lancaster, NY.

13.

Edelstein

(2012) Copper. Report for US Department of Geological Survey, June. Available at: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/copper/myb1-2010-coppe.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).

14.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2014) An assessment of potential mining impacts on salmon ecosystems of Bristol Bay, AK, January. Report for EPA Region 10. Seattle, WA: EPA.

15.

Epstein

(2008) Culture and science/technology: Rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619: 165–182.

16.

Fienup-Riordan

(2008) Yuungnaqpiallerput – The way we genuinely live: Masterworks of Yup’ik science and survival. Available at: http://www.yupikscience.org/1intro/index.html (accessed 22 October 2017).

17.

Frickel

Gibbon

Howard

et al . (2010) Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(4): 444–473.

18.

Fricker

(2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Gallagher

(1987) Native participation in land management planning in Alaska. Arctic 41(2): 91–98.

20.

Gaonkar

(2002) Toward new imaginaries: An introduction. Public Culture 14(1): 1–19.

21.

Groves

(2015) The bomb in my backyard, the serpent in my house: Environmental justice, risk, and the colonization of attachment. Environmental Politics 24(6): 853–873.

22.

Hale

Ross

(2013) The State of Alaska’s effort to become the primary agency to Section 404 permits. Available at: https://dec.alaska.gov/media/6724/soa-effort-to-become-primary-404-agency.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).

23.

Hansel

(1996) Telling Our Lives: Ethnicity and Discourse in Southwestern Alaska. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Hardin

(2012) Treasure hunt: The battle over Alaska’s mega mine. PBS Frontline, 23 July. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/environment/alaska-gold/treasure-hunt-the-battle-over-alaskas-mega-mine/ (accessed 6 September 2018).

25.

Hébert

(2014) The matter of market devices: Economic transformation in a southwest Alaskan salmon fishery. Geoforum 53: 21–30.

26.

Hébert

(2015) Enduring capitalism: Instability, precariousness, and cycles of change in an Alaskan salmon fishery. American Anthropologist 117(1): 32–46.

27.

Hébert

(2016) Chronicle of a disaster foretold: Scientific risk assessment, public participation, and the politics of imperilment in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22(Suppl. 1): 108–126.

28.

Hébert

Brock

(2017) Counting and counter-mapping: Contests over the making of a mining district in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Science as Culture 21(1): 56–87.

29.

Higman

(2008) Seismic risk at the Pebble mine. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

30.

Hobson

(2010) Southwest Alaska Tribes to EPA regarding 404(c). Nondalton Tribal Council. May 21, 2010.

31.

Holley

Mitcham

(2016) The Pebble mine dialogue: A case study on public engagement and the social license to operate. Resource Policy 47(March): 18–27.

32.

Jasanoff

(2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

Jasanoff

Kim

(2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146.

34.

Knapp

Guettabi

Goldsmith

(2013) The economic importance of the Bristol Bay salmon industry. Report for the Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AL, April.

35.

Krieger

(2016) Residents in seafood processing. Alaska Economic Trends: Alaska Department of Labor & Workforce Development 36(11): 5.

36.

Lasley

(2016) Mining news: Alaskan for interior? Will Trump tap Palin, Gillam to lead federal land management agency? Petroleum News. Available at: http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/637956253.shtml (accessed 18 Sept 2018).

37.

McIntyre

Baldwin

Beauchamp

et al . (2012) Low-level copper exposures increase visibility and vulnerability of juvenile coho salmon to cutthroat trout predators. Ecological Applications 22(5): 1460–1471.

38.

Mukerji

(1994) The political mobilization of nature in seventeenth-century French formal gardens. Theory and Society 23(5): 651–677.

39.

Nushagak-Mulchatna Watershed Council (NMWC) (2007) Nushagak River Watershed traditional use area conservation plan. Report, NMWC, Bristol, November.

40.

Nushagak-Mulchatna Watershed Council (NMWC) (2011) Standards and practices for environmentally responsible mining in the Nushagak River watershed. Report, NMWC, Bristol.

41.

O’Neal

(2012) A review of Pebble Limited Partnership’s environmental baseline documents: Resident fish and juvenile salmon habitat, distribution and assemblage. Report, Fisheries Research & Consulting, April. Available at: http://pebblescience.org/pdfs/FINAL_Fish_Assemblage_Review_22_May_2012.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).

42.

Ottinger

(2016) Social movement-based citizen science. In: Cavalier

Kennedy

(eds) The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 89–103.

43.

Parker

(2012) Efforts to conserve the Kvichak and Nushagak drainages. Seattle Journal of Environmental Law 2(1): 219–278.

44.

Pebble Limited Partnership (2011) Geology. Available at: https://www.pebblepartnership.com/geology.html (accessed 8 March 2017).

45.

Pebble Limited Partnership (2012) Environmental baseline document. Available at: https://www.pebbleprojecteis.com/ (accessed 18 September 2017).

46.

Pebble Limited Partnership (2017) Why mine. Available at: https://www.pebblepartnership.com/why.html (accessed 8 March 2017).

47.

Ross

Gould

(2006) Native Americans and the Criminal Justice System: Theoretical and Policy Directions. New York: Routledge.

48.

Scannel

(2009) Effects of copper on aquatic species: A review of literature. Alaska Department of Fish and Game report no. 09-04, June. Available at: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/library/pdfs/habitat/09_04.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).

49.

Schlosberg

Coles

(2015) The new environmentalism of everyday life: Sustainability, material flows, and movements. Contemporary Political Theory 15(2): 160–181.

50.

Scott

(1999) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

51.

Shepard

(2014) Democracy is not dead in Alaska, but HB 77 is – For now. Alaska Dispatch News, 29 June. Available at: https://www.adn.com/commentary/article/democracy-not-dead-alaska-hb-77-now/2014/04/17/ (accessed 23 September 2018).

52.

Stratus Consulting (2012) Review of Pebble Limited Partnership’s environmental baseline data: Hydrologic characterization. Report no. SC12807, 25 May. Available at: http://www.pebblescience.org/pdfs/2012.05.25.EBD.Hydro.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).

53.

US Energy Information Administration (USEIA) (2018) Alaska field production of crude oil. US Department of Energy. 8/31/18 Available at: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPAK2&f=A (accessed 23 September 2018).

54.

Warren

(2016) Seafood harvesting jobs. Alaska Economic Trends: Alaska Department of Labor & Workforce Development 36(11): 5.

55.

Wehling

(2006) The situated materiality of scientific practices: Postconstructivism – A new theoretical perspective in science studies? Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 1: 81–100.

56.

Woody

(2015) Assessing reliability of Pebble Limited Partnership’s salmon escapement studies. Report, Fisheries Research & Consulting, June. Available at: http://pebblescience.org/pdfs/Woody_EBD_EscapementFINAL27June2012.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).

57.

Woody

O’Neal

(2012) Effects of copper on fish and aquatic resources. Report, Fisheries Research and Consulting, March. Available at: http://www.pebblescience.org/copper-and-salmon.html (accessed 6 September 2018).

58.

Zamzow

(2010) Potential impacts to water during exploration at the Pebble prospect, Alaska, 2009-2010. Report, Center for Science in Public Participation. Available at: https://www.csp2.org/files/reports/Potential%20Exploration%20WQ%20Impacts%20-%20Zamzow%20Aug10.pdf (accessed 6 September 2018).

59.

Zamzow

(2011a) Acid rock drainage and metal leaching at the Pebble prospect. Report, Center for Science in Public Participation. Available at: http://pebblescience.org/Pebble-Mine/acid_drainage.html

60.

Zamzow

(2011b) Critique of Pebble Limited Partnership preliminary water quality data for the Pebble prospect, Alaska. Report, Center for Science in Public Participation. Available at: https://www.csp2.org/files/reports/Critique%20of%20PLP%20Water%20Quality%20Data%20-%20Zamzow%20May11.pdf

61.

Zamzow

(2011c) Surface water quality near the Pebble prospect, Southwest Alaska, 2009-2010. Report, Center for Science in Public Participation. Available at: http://www.csp2.org/files/reports/WQR%20-%20TNC_Water_Quality_Report_2011%20-%20Final%20Nov14.pdf

62.

Zamzow

(2012) A review of Pebble Limited Partnership’s environmental baseline documents: Water quality. Report, Center for Science in Public Participation. Available at: http://pebblescience.org/pdfs/Zamzow%20-%20Review%20of%20PLP%20EBD%20-%20Water%20Quality_20120524.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).

63.

Zamzow

Chambers

(2016) Investigation of reclaimed drill sites, Pebble prospect. Report, United Tribes of Bristol Bay, Dillingham, AK, and the Center for Science in Public Participation, Bozeman, MT. Available at: http://utbb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CSP2-Pebble-Inspection-Summary-Report-DMC-3Nov161.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).