Cold War curiosities about the dangers of radiation generated significant funding for an array of biomedical projects as enticing as they were unpredictable, introducing newly standardized experimental animals into laboratories and a novel merging of scientific disciplines. The desire to understand radiation’s effects on human longevity spurred a multi-sited, multi-decade project that subjected beagle dogs to varying degrees of irradiation. One of those laboratories, located at the southern tip of the campus of the University of California, Davis, eventually hosted an elaborate experimental breeding kennel and a population of ‘control’ dogs that set new milestones for canine longevity. The present article examines this gerontological spin-off experiment, using the study of aging as a method and object in order to analyze the emergence and disappearance of the Davis Radiobiology Laboratory and explore how research using new canine model organisms mirrored the politics and anxieties faced by citizens and scientists of the era, here termed ‘species projection’.
AchenbaumWA (1996) Handbooks as gerontologic maps. The Gerontologist36(6): 825–826.
2.
AgambenG (2004) The Open: Man and Animal. Meridian, ID and Stanford, CA: Crossing Aesthetics and Stanford University Press.
3.
AndersenAC (1952a) Progress Report: Unclassified Project No. 4 Contract No. A.t-11-1-gen-10: The Effect of X Radiation on the Work Capacity and Longevity of the Dog, 1951. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
4.
AndersenAC (1952b) Progress Report: Unclassified Project No. 4 Contract No. A.t-11-1-gen-10: The Effect of X Radiation on the Work Capacity and Longevity of the Dog, 1952. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
5.
AndersenAC (1953) Progress Report: Unclassified Project No. 4 Contract No. A.t-11-1-gen-10: The Effect of X Radiation on the Work Capacity and Longevity of the Dog, 1953. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
6.
AndersenAC (1955a) Contract AT 11-1 Gen 10; Project No. 4; Fourth Annual Progress Report for the Period of July 1, 1954 to June 30, 1955. Davis, CA: Atomic Energy Commission.
7.
AndersenAC (1955b) Debarking in a kennel: Technic and results. Veterinary Medicine50(9): 409–411.
8.
AndersenAC (1956) The Effect of X-radiation on the Work Capacity and Longevity of the Dog (Fifth Annual Report, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis). Davis, CA: Atomic Energy Commission.
9.
AndersenAC (1958a) A comparison of beagles released for private ownership with those maintained under kennel conditions. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association132(3): 95–96.
10.
AndersenAC (1958b) The Effect of X-radiation on Work Capacity and Longevity of the Dog: Seventh Annual Progress Report. Davis, CA: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis and Atomic Energy Commission.
11.
AndersenAC (1962a) Life-span studies on irradiated beagles: Practical and academic contributions. Small Animal Clinician2(9): 506–512.
12.
AndersenAC (1962b) Practical information from research in veterinary radiobiology. The Southwest Veterinarian16: 23–30.
13.
AndersenAC (1970) The Beagle as an Experimental Dog. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
14.
AndersenACHartGH (1955) Kennel construction and management in relation to longevity studies in the dog. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association126(938): 366–373.
15.
AndersenACMcKelvieDH (1962) Long-term experiments in relation to treatment effects: Radiobiological and gerontological problems. Proceedings of the Animal Care Panel12(4): 169–181.
16.
AndersenACRosenblattLS (1965) Survival of beagles under natural and laboratory conditions. Experimental Gerontology1(3): 193–199.
17.
AndersenACJasperDEHartGH (1959) A.E.C. Project No. 6 Annual Progress Report (1958). Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
18.
ArbogastWF (1959) Experimental dog’s life big problem for AEC. Austin American-Statesman, 24July.
19.
ArlukeAB (1988) Sacrificial symbolism in animal experimentation: Object or pet?Anthrozoös2(2): 98–117.
20.
Atomic Energy Commission (1954) Report on Project 4 (1953–1954). Davis, CA: Atomic Energy Commission.
21.
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) (1959) 1959 AEC. Board of Consultant’s Meeting. Davis, CA: AEC.
22.
AugéM (2017) Everyone Dies Young: Time Without Age. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
BellG (1973) 1,000 beagles used in radiation experiments have their vocal cords slit by doctors so barking won’t annoy nearby residents. National Inquirer47(19).
24.
BolmanB (2015) The Pigs that therefore we are: 20th Century Porcine Biomedical Experimentation. Thesis, Harvard University.
25.
BolmanB (2016) Sounding sacrifice: de-barking, volume, experimentation. Modern Sciences Working Group, 9September.
26.
BrownJJ (1953) Dogs get atom doses to save lives of men. The Sacramento Bee, 10December.
27.
BustadLK (1981) Animals, Aging, and the Aged. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
BustadLK (1988) Living together: People, animals, environment – A personal historical perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine31(2): 171–184.
Cal Aggie (1974) I sold my pet to the university through a Cal Aggie classified, The California Aggie, 10October. Available at: https://theaggie.org/
31.
California Medicine (1952) Cowdry’s problems of aging: Biological and medical aspects – Third edition. California Medicine77(5): 356.
32.
CanguilhemG (2008) Knowledge of Life (Forms of Living). New York: Fordham University Press.
33.
CarboneL (2004) What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
CazdynE (2012) The Already Dead: The New Time of Politics, Culture, and Illness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
ChodorowNJ (1999) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
ClauseBT (1993) The Wistar rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. Journal of the History of Biology26(2): 329–349.
37.
CooperCBLewensteinBV (2016) Two meanings of citizen science. In: CavalierDKennedyEB (eds) The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science. Tempe, AZ: Consortium of Science, Policy & Outcomes, 51–61.
38.
CruikshankM (2009) Learning to Be Old: Gender, Culture, and Aging. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
39.
DaviesG (2012) What is a humanized mouse? Remaking the species and spaces of translational medicine. Body & Society18(3–4): 126–155.
40.
DaviesG (2013) Mobilizing experimental life: Spaces of becoming with mutant mice. Theory, Culture & Society30(7–8): 129–154.
41.
Davis Daily Democrat (1980) Hundreds of Beagles Yelp in Brief Bid for Freedom. Davis Daily Democrat.
42.
DegelingC (2008) Canines, consanguinity, and one-medicine: All the qualities of a dog except loyalty. Health and History10(2): 23–47.
43.
DerridaJ (1988) The politics of friendship. The Journal of Philosophy85(11): 632–644.
44.
DickeyW (1984) Armageddon. In: SchleyJ (ed.) Writing in a Nuclear Age. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, pp. 42-43.
DumitJ (2012) Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
47.
DziukHE (1960) Animal care procedures at Hanford. Paper presented to USAF-AEC Conference of Supervisors - Long-Term Experimental Animal Colonies, Austin, Texas, 12 July.
48.
FeuerbacherENWynneCDL (2011) A history of dogs as subjects in North American experimental psychological research. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews6: 46–71.
49.
GalisonP (1987) How Experiments End. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
50.
GalisonP (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
GardinerA (2014) The ‘dangerous’ women of animal welfare: How British veterinary medicine went to the dogs. Social History of Medicine27(3): 466–487.
52.
GemsD (2014) What is an anti-aging treatment?Experimental Gerontology58: 14–18.
53.
GiraudEHollinG (2016) Care, laboratory beagles and affective utopia. Theory, Culture & Society33(4): 27–49.
54.
GoldmanM (1963) A plea for relief. Marvin Goldman papers, Special Collections, University Library, UC Davis.
55.
GoldmanM (1994) Human radiation studies: Remembering the early years: Oral history of radiation biologist Marvin Goldman. (Interview by Loretta Hefner and Karoline Gourley, 22December). Available at: https://ehss.energy.gov/ohre/roadmap/histories/0468/0468toc.html. (accessed 22 February 2018)
56.
HarawayDJ (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
HillingerC (1968) Old age is a dog’s life: Geriatric beagles like humans. Los Angeles Times, 22September.
59.
IrwinA (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.
60.
JonesSD (2002) Valuing Animals: Veterinarians and Their Patients in Modern America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
KaeberleinM (2016) The biology of aging: Citizen scientists and their pets as a bridge between research on model organisms and human subjects. Veterinary Pathology53(2): 291–298.
62.
KirkRGW (2012) ‘Standardization through mechanization’: Germ-free life and the engineering of the ideal laboratory animal. Technology and Culture53(1): 61–93.
63.
KohlerRE (1994) Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
64.
LewensteinBV (2016) Expertise, democracy and science communication. Paper presentation for the international conference on public communication of science and technology, Istanbul, Turkey. Available at: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/44567 (accessed 7 October 2017).
65.
LynchME (1988) Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science18(2): 265–289.
66.
McKelvieDHAndersenACParkerH (1963) A new dog cage for hospitals and research. Petfood Industry (February): 18–22.
67.
McKelvieDHPowelTJLeeS (1967) Programming for computer storage, retrieval, and analyses of clinical chemistry data in a life-span study on beagles. Laboratory Animal Care17(5): 494–500.
68.
MargóscyD (2017) A long history of breakdowns: A historiographical review. Social Studies of Science47(3): 307–325.
69.
MascoJ (2013) Engineering the future as nuclear ruin. In: StolerAL (ed.) Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 252–286.
70.
MascoJ (2014) The Theater of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
71.
MascoJ (2015) The age of fallout. History of the Present5(2): 137–168.
72.
MbembeA (2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture15(1): 11–40.
73.
MoreiraTPalladinoP (2009) Ageing between gerontology and biomedicine. Biosocieties4(4): 349–365.
74.
MSS Information Corporation (1974) Dogs & Other Large Mammals in Aging Research: I. New York: MSS Information Corporation.
75.
O’BrienM (1981) The Politics of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
76.
OldsS (1984) When. In: SchleyJ (ed.) Writing in a Nuclear Age. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 72.
77.
ParkHW (2016) Old Age, New Science: Gerontologists and Their Biosocial Visions, 1900–1960. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
78.
PearseHEKingsleyHDSchillingJAet al. (1951) Operation Greenhouse: Scientific Director’s Report, Annex 2.7, Thermal-Radiation Injury. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project.
79.
PembertonS (2004) Canine technologies, model patients: The historical production of hemophiliac dogs in American biomedicine. In: SchrepferSRScrantonP (eds) Industrializing Organisms: Introducing Evolutionary History. New York: Routledge, pp. 191–214.
80.
PetrynaA (2013) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl, 2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
PreciadoB (2013) Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: The Feminist Press at CUNY.
82.
RaabeOGAbellDL (1990) 1989 Final Annual Report. Davis, CA: Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research.
83.
RaderK (2004) Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900-1955. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
84.
RadinJ (2017) Life on Ice: A History of New Uses for Cold Blood. Chicago, IL: The University Of Chicago Press.
85.
RheinbergerH-J (2010) An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
86.
RitvoH (2010) Noble Cows and Hybrid Zebras: Essays on Animals and History. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
87.
San Francisco Chronicle (1956) Man’s Best Friend Faces Strontium 90. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Chronicle.
88.
SaraivaT (2016) Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
89.
ShockNWGreulichRCAndresRet al. (1984) Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Washington, DC: National Institute of Health.
90.
StoverBJStoverCNJr. (1972) The laboratory for radiobiology at the University of Utah. In: StoverBJ (ed.) Radiobiology of Plutonium. Salt Lake City, UT: JW Press.
91.
SulkinNM (1968) The Laboratory Animal in Gerontological Research: Proceedings of a Symposium Conducted by Committee on Animal Research in Gerontology, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
92.
ThompsonRC (1989) Life-Span Effects of Ionizing Radiation in the Beagle Dog: A Summary Account of Four Decades of Research Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and Its Predecessor Agencies. Washington, DC: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Department of Energy.
