In 1959, the Charles Darwin Station and the Galápagos National Park were established, formally inaugurating conservation on the archipelago. In the same year, a utopian colony from the United States arrived. Whereas scholars have dismissed the latter and focused on the former, this essay unveils the science-inspired utopianism common to both enterprises. Investing science with the exclusive role of producing all knowledge and steering politics, leaders of the two initiatives aspired not only to protect nature but also to forge a new humanity. Describing how such ambitions burst along lines of race, class, and nationality, I argue that these enterprises consolidated the current understanding of the Galápagos as “pristine”: a site fit for research and tourism but unhospitable to (other) people. Drawing on archival and historical documents, this essay aims to reinvigorate two conversations: one between science and technology studies (STS) and conservation, and the other between STS and utopian studies. If recent attempts at bridging the divide between science and imagination have emphasized how powerful actors shape human society, this essay considers the long-lasting effects of scientific imaginaries on a politics of nature.
AndersonBen. 2006. “‘Transcending without Transcendence’: Utopianism and an Ethos of Hope.” Antipode38 (4): 691–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00472.x.
2.
AndersonBen. 2010. The Pursuit of Ecotopia: Lessons from Indigenous and Traditional Societies for the Human Ecology of Our Modern World. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
3.
BettisStan. 1971. “A Voyage to the World’s End.” Old Oregon Magazine, pp. 8–11.
4.
BiersackAlettaGreenbergJames B.. 2006. Reimagining Political Ecology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BlochErnst. 1995. The Principle of Hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BocciPaolo. 2017. “Tangles of Care: Killing Goats to Save Tortoises on the Galápagos Islands.” Cultural Anthropology32 (3): 424–49. doi: 10.14506/ca32.3.08.
7.
BocciPaolo. 2019. “Planting the Seeds of the Future: Eschatological Environmentalism in the Time of the Anthropocene.” Religions10 (2): 125.
8.
BontRaf De. 2015. “‘Primitives’ and Protected Areas: International Conservation and the ‘Naturalization’ of Indigenous People, ca. 1910–1975.” Journal of the History of Ideas76 (2): 215–36. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2015.0014.
9.
BradshawGayBorchersJeffrey. 2000. “Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap.” Ecology and Society4 (1): Article 7.
10.
BrosiusJ. PeterTsingAnna LowenhauptZernerCharles. 2005. Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-based Natural Resource Management. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman Altamira.
11.
CattonWilliam R.LarsenOtto N.FarisRobert. 1964. “The Galapagos Expedition: Failure in the Pursuit of a Contemporary Secular Utopia.” The Pacific Sociological Review7 (1): 48–54.
12.
ChanKai M. A.Rebecca ShawM.CameronDavid R.UnderwoodEmma C.DailyGretchen C.. 2006. “Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services.” PLOS Biology4 (11): e379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
13.
ClaeysGregory. 2016. Dystopia: A Natural History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
CooperDavina. 2013. Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
DeLoughreyElizabeth M.2010. Routes and Roots. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
16.
DeLoughreyElizabeth M.2013. “The Myth of Isolates: Ecosystem Ecologies in the Nuclear Pacific.” Cultural Geographies20 (2): 167–84. doi: 10.1177/1474474012463664.
17.
DoddStuart n.d. “The Galapagos Explorations on Ways of Life (GL).” Project “Watch Ways,” 60–88. Stuart Carter Dodd Papers, 1924-1975. Special Collections. University of Washington Libraries, Seattle, WA.
18.
DoddStuartKirkJohn n.d. “The Galapagos Experiment (GE).” Papers in the “formative” stage. Volume V, Paper 138. Stuart Carter Dodd Papers, 1924-1975. Special Collections. University of Washington Libraries Seattle, WA.
19.
DorstJean. 1959. “L’avenir de La Faune Aux Iles Galapagos.” Nature et Science36 (1959): 12–17.
20.
Eibl-EibesfeldtIrenäus. 1959. “Survey on the Galapagos Islands.” UNESCO Mission Report8 (1959): 7–31.
21.
Eibl-EibesfeldtIrenäus. 1961. Galapagos: The Noah’s Ark of the Pacific. New York: Doubleday.
22.
EngelsFriedrich. 1892. Socialism, Utopian and Scientific. London, UK: S. Sonnenschein.
23.
EngelsFriedrichMarxKarl. 2004. The Communist Manifesto. London, UK: Penguin.
24.
EngermanDavid C.2012. “Introduction: Histories of the Future and the Futures of History.” The American Historical Review117 (5): 1402–10. doi: 10.1093/ahr/117.5.1402.
EspositoMaurizio. 2011. “Utopianism in the British Evolutionary Synthesis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Defining Darwinism: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Debate42 (1): 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.007.
27.
FairheadJamesLeachMelissaScoonesIan. 2012. “Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?” The Journal of Peasant Studies39 (2): 237–61. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
28.
FischerFrank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
FiskeAmelia. 2017. “Natural Resources by Numbers: The Promise of ‘El Uno Por Mil’ in Ecuador’s Yasuní-ITT Oil Operations.” Environment and Society8 (1): 125–43.
30.
GarforthLisa. 2018. Green Utopias: Environmental Hope before and after Nature. New York: John Wiley.
31.
GonzálezJoséMontesCarlosRodríguezDaniel. 2008. “Rethinking the Galapagos Islands as a Complex Social-ecological System: Implications for Conservation and Management.” Ecology and Society13 (2): 13.
32.
GordinMichael D.TilleyHelenPrakashGyan. 2010. Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
GrahamWatkinsCruzFelipe. 2007. “Galapagos at Risk.” A Socioeconomic Analysis. Puerto Ayora, Ecuador: Charles Darwin Foundation.
34.
GranjouCélineArpinIsabelle. 2015. “Epistemic Commitments: Making Relevant Science in Biodiversity Studies.” Science, Technology, & Human Values40 (6): 1022–46. doi: 10.1177/0162243915587361.
35.
GrenierChristophe. 2007. Conservación Contra Natura. Las Islas Galápagos. Vol. 233. Editorial Abya Yala.
36.
GroveRichard H.1996. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600-1860. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HarawayDonna J.1990. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Reprint, New York: Routledge.
HechtGabrielle. 2011. Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
HennessyElizabeth. 2015. “The Molecular Turn in Conservation: Genetics, Pristine Nature, and the Rediscovery of an Extinct Species of Galapagos Giant Tortoise.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers105 (1): 87–104.
41.
HennessyElizabeth. 2018. “The Politics of a Natural Laboratory: Claiming Territory and Governing Life in the Galápagos Islands.” Social Studies of Science48 (4): 483–506. doi: 10.1177/0306312718788179.
42.
HennessyElizabethMcClearyAmy. 2011. “Nature’s Eden? The Production and Effects of ‘Pristine’ Nature in the Galápagos Islands.” Island Studies Journal6 (2): 131–56.
43.
HillingerCharles. 1960. “Colonists Now Face Political Issues.” Los Angeles Times, October 13, p. 3.
44.
HurlbutJ. BenjaminTirosh-SamuelsonHava. 2016. Perfecting Human Futures: Transhuman Visions and Technological Imaginations. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
45.
HuxleyJulian. 1948. UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
46.
HuxleyJulian. 1963. “Eugenics in Evolutionary Perspective.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine6 (2): 155–87. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1963.0015.
47.
HuxleyJulian. 1966. “Charles Darwin: The Galapagos and After.” In The Galápagos: Proceedings of the Symposia of the Galápagos International Scientific Project, edited by BowmanRobert, 3. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
HuxleyJ. S.WellsH. G.HaldaneJ. B. S.OggW. G.DrummondJ. C.CrickW. F.MunroJ. W., et al.1944. Reshaping Man’s Heritage: Biology in the Service of Man. London, UK: G. Allen & Unwin.
49.
IUCN (International Union of the Conservation of Nature). 1956. “Resolution.” In Fifth General Assembly. Edimburgh, UK: IUCN.
50.
JacobyKarl. 2003. Crimes against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
JasanoffSheila. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge.
52.
JasanoffSheila. 2009. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
54.
KratzShawn. 1960. “Oldtimers Lukewarm to Colony Idea.” The Eugene Guard, October 20, p. 6
55.
LachenalGuillaume. 2016. “At Home in the Postcolony: Ecology, Empire and Domesticity at the Lamto Field Station, Ivory Coast.” Social Studies of Science46 (6): 877–93. doi: 10.1177/0306312716649800.
56.
LatorreOctavio. 1999. El hombre en las Islas Encantadas: la historia humana de Galápagos. O. Latorre [s.n.].
57.
LatourBruno. 2009. Politics of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
LevitasRuth. 2013. Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Springer.
59.
LockyerJoshuaVetetoJames R.. 2013. Environmental Anthropology Engaging Ecotopia: Bioregionalism, Permaculture, and Ecovillages. New York: Berghahn Books.
60.
LuFloraValdiviaGabrielaWolfordWendy. 2013. “Social Dimensions of ‘Nature at Risk’ in the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador.” Conservation and Society11 (1): 83. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.110945.
61.
LundhJacob. The Last Day of a Paradise. Unpublished manuscript.
62.
MarcusGeorge E.1995. Technoscientific Imaginaries: Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
MartinLaura J.2018. “Proving Grounds: Ecological Fieldwork in the Pacific and the Materialization of Ecosystems.” Environmental History23 (3): 567–92. doi: 10.1093/envhis/emy007.
64.
MarxKarl. 2008. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Wildside Press.
65.
MascoJoseph. 2010. “Bad Weather: On Planetary Crisis.” Social Studies of Science40 (1): 7–40. doi: 10.1177/0306312709341598.
66.
McNeillMaureenArribas-AyllonMichaelHaranJoanMackenzieAdrian. 2016. “Conceptualizing Imaginaries of Science, Technology, and Society.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by HackettE. J.EdwardJ.OlgaJ, A.LynchM.WajcmanJ., 435–464. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
MignoloWalter D.2012. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
MoreSir Thomas. 1517. Utopia. Paris, France: Gilles de Gourmont.
69.
MuñozJosé Esteban. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: NYU Press.
70.
NeumannRoderick P.1998. Imposing Wilderness: Struggles Over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
71.
OldenzielRuth. 2011. “Islands: The United States as a Networked Empire.” In Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War, edited by HechtGabrielle, 13–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
OspinaPablo. 2006. Galápagos, naturaleza y sociedad: actores sociales y conflictos ambientales en las islas Galápagos. Quito, Ecuador: Corporación Editora Nacional.
73.
Parque Nacional Galapagos. 2014. “Plan de Manejo de Las Areas Protegidas de Galapagos Para El Buen Vivir”. Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador.
74.
ParraCostanzaCaseyWalsh. 2016. “Introduction Socialities of Nature beyond Utopia.” Nature and Culture11 (3): 229–38.
75.
PribilskyJason. 2009. “Development and the ‘Indian Problem’ in the Cold War Andes: Indigenismo, Science, and Modernization in the Making of the Cornell-Peru Project at Vicos.” Diplomatic History33 (3): 405–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2009.00778.x.
76.
RabyMegan. 2017. American Tropics. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press.
77.
RossEric B.2005. “Vicos as Cold War Strategy.” Anthropology in Action12 (3): 21–33. doi: 10.3167/096720105780458936.
78.
SackleyNicole. 2013. “Village Models: Etawah, India, and the Making and Remaking of Development in the Early Cold War.” Diplomatic History37 (4): 749–78. doi: 10.1093/dh/dht037.
79.
SargentLyman Tower. 1994. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited.” Utopian Studies5 (1): 1–37.
80.
SlugaGlenda. 2010. “UNESCO and the (One) World of Julian Huxley.” Journal of World History21 (3): 393–418.
81.
SmithJessica M.TidwellAbraham S. D.. 2016. “The Everyday Lives of Energy Transitions: Sociotechnical Imaginaries in the American West.” Social Studies of Science46 (3): 327–50. doi: 10.1177/0306312716644534.
82.
SpivakGayatri Chakravorty. 2010. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea, edited by MorrisRosalind C., 81–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
83.
SquierSusan Merrill. 2004. Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
84.
ThompsonCharis. 2002. “When Elephants Stand for Competing Philosophies of Nature: Amboseli National Parc, Kenya.” In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, edited by HerrnsteinSmith, B.WeintraubE. R.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
85.
The Times-Picayune. 1961. “Effort to Establish Colony on Galapagos Isles Fails.” March 7, p. 4.
86.
TurnhoutEstherWatertonClaireNevesKatjaBuizerMarleen. 2012. “Rethinking Biodiversity: From Goods and Services to ‘Living With.’” Conservation Letters6 (3): 154–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x.
87.
TuttonRichard. 2018. “Multiplanetary Imaginaries and Utopia: The Case of Mars One.” Science, Technology, & Human Values43 (3): 518–39. doi: 10.1177/0162243917737366.
88.
WeindlingPaul. 2012. “Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century Britain.” Journal of Modern European History10 (4): 480–99. doi: 10.17104/1611-8944_2012_4_480.
