This article is about mid-20th-century attempts to turn subjective judgments about the quality and composition of wine into objective knowledge. It focuses on the research of Maynard Amerine at the University of California, Davis, and his project to formalize the procedures of sensory evaluation. Using controlled experimental conditions, Amerine and colleagues transcribed judgments about taste into numbers that could then be aggregated and analyzed statistically. Through such techniques, they claimed to be able to turn subjectivities into objectivities, rendering private taste sensations into reliable and stable facts about objects in the world.
AlderHLKrenerAJShepardL (1993) Edward B. Roessler, Mathematics: Davis. In: KroghD (ed.) University of California: In Memoriam, 1993. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 153–154. Available at: http://texts.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb0h4n99rb (accessed 29 July 2015).
2.
AmerineM (1948) An application of ‘triangular’ taste testing to wines. The Wine Review16(5): 10–12.
3.
AmerineMAMarshGL (1939) Wine judging methods at the 1939 fairs. The Wine Review6: 20.
4.
AmerineMARoesslerEB (1952) Techniques and problems in the organoleptic examination of wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture3(1): 97–115.
5.
AmerineMARoesslerEB (1976) Wines: Their Sensory Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
6.
AmerineMASingletonVL (1965) Wine: An Introduction for Americans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
AmerineMARoesslerEBFilipelloF (1959) Modern sensory methods of evaluating wine. Hilgardia28(18): 477–567.
8.
ArmitageP (1954) Sequential tests in prophylactic and therapeutic trials. Quarterly Journal of Medicine23: 255–274.
9.
ArmitageP (1975) Sequential Medical Trials, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BeecherHK (1959) Measurement of Subjective Responses: Quantitative Effects of Drugs. New York: Oxford.
11.
BeecherHK (1966) Pain: One mystery solved. Science151(3712): 840–841.
12.
BenzecryCE (2011) The Opera Fanatic: Ethnography of an Obsession. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BerensteinN (2016) Flavor Added: Synthetic Flavors and Flavor Science in the United States, 1870–1970. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
BoukD (2015) How Our Days Became Numbered: Risk and the Rise of the Statistical Individual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
BradleyRA (1953) Some statistical methods in taste testing and quality evaluation. Biometrics9(1): 22–38.
16.
CambrosioAKeatingPSchlichT. (2006) Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Social Science & Medicine63: 189–199.
17.
CambrosioAKeatingPSchlichT. (2009) Biomedical conventions and regulatory objectivity: A few introductory remarks. Social Studies of Science39(5): 651–664.
18.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
19.
CornfieldJ (1966) Sequential trials, sequential analysis and the likelihood principle. The American Statistician20(2): 18–23.
20.
DastonL (1991) Baconian facts, academic civility and the prehistory of objectivity. Annals of Scholarship8: 337–363.
21.
DastonL (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science22(4): 597–618.
22.
DastonLGalisonP (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone.
23.
DearP (1992) From truth to disinterestedness in the seventeenth century. Social Studies of Science22(4): 619–631.
24.
FisherRA (1935) The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
25.
FisherRAYatesF (1974) Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th edn.London: Longman.
26.
GigerenzerGSwijtinkZPorterTM. (1989) The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GiocoliN (2013) From Wald to Savage: Homo Economicus becomes a Bayesian statistician. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences49(1): 63–95.
28.
HarrisonSElderLW (1950) Some applications of statistics to laboratory taste testing. Food Technology4: 434–439.
29.
HennionA (2001) Music lovers: Taste as performance. Theory, Culture and Society18(5): 1–22.
30.
HennionA (2005) Pragmatics of taste. In: JacobsMDHanrahanNW (eds) The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 131–144.
31.
HennionA (2007) Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology1: 97–114.
32.
HennionATeilG (2004) Le goût du vin: Pour une sociologie de l’attention. In: Nahoum-GrappeVVincentO (eds) Le Goût des Belles Choses. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 111–126.
33.
HopkinsJW (1953) Laboratory flavor scoring: Two experiments in incomplete blocks. Biometrics9(1): 1–21.
34.
HunterPW (2004) Connections, context, and community: Abraham Wald and the sequential probability ratio test. The Mathematical Intelligencer26(1): 25–33.
35.
IgoSE (2008) The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
JacksonJE (1960) Bibliography on sequential analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association55(291): 561–580.
37.
JacksonRS (2009) Wine Tasting: A Professional Handbook, 2nd edn.Amsterdam: Academic Press.
38.
JonesLVPeryamDRThurstoneLL (1955) Development of a scale for measuring soldiers’ food preferences. Journal of Food Science20(5): 512–520.
39.
LahneJ (2016) Sensory science, the food industry and the objectification of taste. Anthropology of Food10. Available at: http://aof.revues.org/7956
40.
LamontM (2009) How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
LemovR (2015) Database of Dreams: The Long Quest to Catalog Humanity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
LibermanK (2013) The phenomenology of coffee tasting: Lessons in practical objectivity. In: More Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 215–266.
43.
LombardiGJ (1951) The Sequential Selection of Judges for Organoleptic Testing. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA.
44.
McCormickL (2009) Higher, faster, louder: Representations of the International Music Competition. Cultural Sociology3(1): 5–30.
45.
McCoyE (2005) The Emperor of Wine: The Rise of Robert M. Parker, Jr. and the Reign of American Taste. New York: Ecco.
46.
McQuaidJ (2015) Tasty: The Art and Science of What We Eat. New York: Scribner.
47.
MarksHM (1997) The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MasonDDKochEJ (1953) Problems in the design and statistical analysis of taste tests. Biometrics9(1): 39–46.
49.
PinneyT (2012) The Makers of American Wine: A Record of Two Hundred Years. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
PorterTM (1992) Quantification and the accounting ideal in science. Social Studies of Science22(4): 633–651.
51.
PorterTM (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
PorterTM (2011) Statistics and the career of public reason. In: CrookTO’HaraG (eds) Statistics and the Public Sphere: Numbers and the People in Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000. New York: Routledge, pp. 32–47.
53.
PusaisJChabanonRL (1974 [1969]) Initiation into the Art of Wine Tasting (trans. VaccaroJL). Madison, WI: Interpublish.
54.
RoesslerEB (1936) Problems in Agricultural Mathematics. Ann Arbor, MI: Edward Bros.
55.
RoesslerEBWarrenJGuymonJF (1948) Significance in triangular taste tests. Food Research13: 503–505.
56.
RoosthS (2013) Of foams and formalisms: Scientific expertise and craft practice in molecular gastronomy. American Anthropologist115(1): 4–16.
57.
ShapinS (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
ShapinS (2005) Hedonistic fruit bombs. London Review of Books27(3): 30–32.
59.
ShapinS (2012a) The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science42(2): 170–184.
60.
ShapinS (2012b) The tastes of wine: Towards a cultural history. Rivista di Estetica n.s. 51: 49–94.
61.
ShapinS (2016) A taste of science: Making the subjective objective in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science46: 436–460.
62.
SimonRWeissGHHoelDG (1975) Sequential analysis of binomial clinical trials. Biometrika62(1): 195–200.
63.
SmithBC (ed.) (2007) Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
SolomonJR (1998) Objectivity in the Making: Francis Bacon and the Politics of Inquiry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
SpenceCPiqueras-FiszmanB (2014) The Perfect Meal: The Multisensory Science of Food and Dining. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
66.
Statistical Research Group (1945) Sequential analysis in inspection and experimentation. Report No. 255, AMP Report 30.2R. New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
StoneH (2014) Sensory evaluation in the Journal of Food Science – 1936 to the Present. Journal of Food Science79(1): iii.
68.
TousignantNR (2006) Pain and the pursuit of objectivity: Pain-measurement technologies in the United States, c. 1890–1975. PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
69.
TousignantNR (2011) The rise and fall of the dolorimeter: Pain, analgesics and the management of subjectivity in mid-twentieth-century United States. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences66(2): 145–179.
70.
WaldA (1947) Sequential Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
