How and why did the scientific consensus about sea level rise due to the disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), expressed in the third Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment, disintegrate on the road to the fourth? Using ethnographic interviews and analysis of IPCC documents, we trace the abrupt disintegration of the WAIS consensus. First, we provide a brief historical overview of scientific assessments of the WAIS. Second, we provide a detailed case study of the decision not to provide a WAIS prediction in the Fourth Assessment Report. Third, we discuss the implications of this outcome for the general issue of scientists and policymakers working in assessment organizations to make projections. IPCC authors were less certain about potential WAIS futures than in previous assessment reports in part because of new information, but also because of the outcome of cultural processes within the IPCC, including how people were selected for and worked together within their writing groups. It became too difficult for IPCC assessors to project the range of possible futures for WAIS due to shifts in scientific knowledge as well as in the institutions that facilitated the interpretations of this knowledge.
AbramsP (1988) Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977)Journal of Historical Sociology1(1): 58–89.
2.
AlleyRBWhillansIM (1991) Changes in the West Antarctic ice sheet. Science254(5034): 959–963.
3.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1980) Conference Proceedings. The Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Studying the Response of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to CO2-Induced Climatic Warming, 8–10 April, University of Maine at Orono.
4.
BamberJLRivaREMVermeersenBLALeBroqAM (2009) Reassessment of the potential sea-level rise from a collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Science324(5929): 901–903.
5.
BarnettTP (1982) On Possible Changes in Global Sea Level and their Potential Causes. Washington, DC: Department of Energy.
6.
BentleyCR (1982) The West Antarctic ice sheet: Diagnosis and prognosis. Proceedings of the Carbon Dioxide Research Conference. NTIS: Springfield, VA.
7.
BolinB (2007) A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee (1982) Increasing Carbon Dioxide and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: Notes on an Informal Workshop. National Research Council. San Diego: Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
9.
Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee (1983) Changing Climate. National Research Council Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
Committee to Review the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2010) Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC. Amsterdam: Inter-Academy Council.
11.
EdwardsP (1999) Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture8(4): 437–472.
12.
EdwardsP (2010) A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
EdwardsPSchneiderS (2001) Self-governance and peer review in science-for-policy: The case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report. In: MillerCEdwardsP (eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
ElzingaA (1996) Shaping worldwide consensus: The orchestration of global change research. In: ElzingaALandströmC (eds) Internationalism and Science. London and Los Angeles: Taylor Graham.
15.
FarrellAEJagerJ (eds) (2006) Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
16.
FergusonJ (1999) Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (SheridanA, trans). New York: Pantheon Books.
18.
FrickerHAScambosTABindschadlerRAPadmanL (2007) An active subglacial water system in West Antarctica mapped from space. Science351(5818): 1544–1548.
19.
GustonDH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental science and policy: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values26(4): 399–408.
20.
HoffmanJSKeyesDTitusJG (1983) Projecting Future Sea Level Rise: Methodology, Estimates to the Year 2100, and Research Needs. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
21.
HughesT (1973) Is the West Antarctic ice sheet disintegrating?Journal of Geophysical Research78: 7884–7910.
22.
HughesT (1977) West Antarctic ice streams. Reviews of Geophysics Space Science15: 1–46.
23.
HulmeMMahoneyM (2010) Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?Progress in Physical Geography34: 705–718.
24.
Institute for Energy Analysis (1983) Proceedings: Carbon Dioxide Research Conference: Carbon Dioxide, Science and Consensus. Washington, DC: Institute for Energy Analysis.
25.
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1981) Life on a Warmer Earth: Possible Climatic Consequences of a Man-Made Global Warming. IIASA Executive Report ER-81-003. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.
26.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
JasanoffS (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
JasanoffS (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
JasanoffSWynneB (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In: RaynerSMaloneE (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume 1: The Societal Framework. Pacific Northwest Labs: Batelle Press.
31.
LahsenM (2005) Seductive simulations? Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science35(6): 895–922.
32.
Le TreutHSomervilleRCubaschUDingYMauritzenCMokssitA. (2007) Historical overview of climate change. In: SolomonSQinDManningMChenZMarquisMAverytKB. (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
LytheMBVaughanDG and Bedmap Consortium (2001) BEDMAP: A new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research106(B6): 11335–11351.
34.
MacAyealDR (1989) Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment: Theory and application to ice stream B, Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research94: 4071–4087.
35.
MacKenzieD (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
36.
MayoDGHollanderRD (eds) (1994) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
MeehlGAStockerTFCollinsWDFriedlingsteinPGayeATGregoryJM. (2007) Global climate projections. In: SolomonSQinDManningMChenZMarquisMAverytKB. (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MercerJH (1968) Antarctic ice and Sangamon sea level. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Symposia79: 217–225.
39.
MercerJH (1978) West Antarctic Ice Sheet and CO2 greenhouse effect: A threat of disaster. Nature271: 321–325.
40.
MillerC (2001) Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values26(4): 478–500.
41.
MosseD (2004) Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change35(4): 639–671.
42.
National Research Council (1985) Glaciers, Ice Sheets, and Sea Level: Effect of a CO2-Induced Climatic Change. Report of a Workshop Held in Seattle, Washington September 13–15, 1984. Prepared by the Ad Hoc Committee on the Relationship Between Land Ice and Sea Level, Committee on Glaciology, Polar Research Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, and National Research Council. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
43.
OppenheimerMO’NeillBCWebsterMAgrawalaS (2007) Climate change: The limits of consensus. Science317(5844): 1505–1506.
44.
OreskesN (1999) The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
OreskesNBelitzK (2001) Philosophical issues in model assessment. In: AndersonMGBatesPD (eds) Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
46.
OreskesNShrader-FrechetteKBelitzK (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science263: 641–646.
47.
OrrellD (2008) The Future of Everything: The Science of Prediction. New York: Basic Books.
48.
ParkerWS (2009) Confirmation and adequacy-for-purpose in climate modeling. Aristotelian Society83S(1): 233–249.
49.
PattAG (1999) Extreme outcomes: The strategic treatment of low probability events in scientific assessments. Risk, Decision and Policy4(1): 1–15.
50.
PattAG (2007) Assessing model-based and conflict-based uncertainty. Global Environmental Change17(1): 37–46.
51.
PetersenAC (2006) Simulation uncertainty and the challenge of postnormal science. In: LenhardJKüppersGShinnT (eds) Simulation: Pragmatic Constructions of Reality. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook25. Dordrecht: Springer, 173–185.
52.
PfefferWTHarperJTO’NeelS (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea level rise. Science321: 1340–1342.
53.
RahmstorfS (2007a) A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science315: 368–370.
RandallDAWoodRABonySColmanRFichefetTFyfeJ. (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: SolomonSQinDManningMChenZMarquisMAverytKB. (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RignotEBamberJLvan den BroekeMRDavisCLiYvandeBergWJvan MeijgaardE (2008) Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling. Nature Geoscience1: 106–110.
57.
RilesA (ed.) (2006) Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58.
SarewitzD (2011) The voice of science: Let’s agree to disagree. Nature478: 7.
59.
SarewitzDPielkeRAJrByerlyRJr (2000) Prediction: Science, Decision Making and the Future of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
60.
SchneiderS (2009) Science as a Contact Sport. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society Press.
61.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
62.
ShackleyS (1997) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Consensual knowledge and global politics. Global Environmental Change7: 77–79.
63.
ShackleySWynneB (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology, & Human Values21(3): 275–302.
64.
SkodvinT (2000) Structure and Agency in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
65.
SmithIM (1982) Carbon Dioxide – Emissions and Effects. Report Number IC TIS/TR 18 IEA Coal Research: London.
66.
Social Learning Group (ClarkWCJaegerJvon EijndhovenJDicksonNM, eds) (2001) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vols. 1 and 2: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
ThomasRHBentleyCR (1978) A model for holocene retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Quaternary Research10: 150–170.
68.
Van der VeenCJ (1985) Response of a marine ice sheet to changes at the grounding line. Quaternary Research24: 257–267.
69.
VaughanD (2008) West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse – the fall and rise of a paradigm. Climatic Change91(1/2): 65–79.
70.
VelicognaI (2009) Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophysical Research Letters36(L19503).
71.
VermeerMRahmstorfS (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106: 21527–21532.
72.
WeertmanJ (1974) Stability of the junction of an ice sheet and an ice shelf. Journal of Glaciology13:3–11.
73.
WinghamDJWallisDWShepherdA (2009) Spatial and temporal evolution of Pine Island Glacier thinning, 1995–2006. Geophysical Research Letters36(L17501).
