A new generation of climate fiction called Cli-fi has emerged in the last decade, marking the strong consensus that has emerged over climate change. Science fiction’s concept of cognitive estrangement that combines a rational imperative to understand while focusing on something different from our everyday world provides one linkage between climate fiction and science fiction. Five novels representing this genre that has substantial connections with science fiction are analyzed, focusing on themes common across these books: their framing of the climate change problem, their representations of science and scientists, their portrayals of economic and environmental challenges, and their scenarios for addressing the climate challenge. The analysis is framed through Taylor’s ideas of the social imaginary and the sociology of expectations, which proposes that expectations are promissory, deterministic, and performative. The novels illustrate in varying ways the problems attending the science-society relationship, the economic imperatives that have driven the characters’ choices, and the contradictory impulses that define our connections with nature. Such representations provide a picture of the challenges that need to be understood, but scenarios that offer possibilities for change are not as fully developed. This suggests that these books may represent a given moment in the longer trajectory of climate fiction while offering the initial building blocks to reconsider our ways of living so that new expectations and imaginaries can be debated and reconceived.
AdjerW. N.DessaiS.GouldenM.HulmeM.LorenzoniI.NelsonD. R.. . . WrefordA. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?Climatic Change, 93, 335-354.
BainbridgeW. S. (1986). Dimensions of science fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
9.
BergthallerH. (2010). Housebreaking the human animal: Humanism and the problem of sustainability in Margaret Atwood’sOryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood. English Studies, 91, 728-743.
BookerK.ThomasA. (2009). The science fiction handbook. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
13.
BorupM.BrownN.KonradK.Van LenteH. (2006). Special issue on the sociology of expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 285-298.
14.
BourdieuP. (1994). Structures, habitus, power. In DirksN. B.EleyG.OrtnerS. (Eds.), Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 155-199). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GroesS. (2008). Ian McEwan: Contemporary critical perspectives. New York, NY: Continuum.
33.
GuiceG. (1999). Designing the future: The culture of new trends in science and technology. Research Policy, 28, 81-98.
34.
HambrickK. (2012). Destroying imagination to save reality: Environmental apocalypse in science fiction. In BarattaC. (Ed.), Environmentalism in the realm of science fiction and fantasy literature (pp. 129-142). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.
HowellsC. A. (2006). The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HulmeM. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report (Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
41.
ItarantaE. (2014). Memory of water. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
42.
JamesE.MendelsohnS. (2003). The Cambridge companion to science fiction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43.
JasanoffS. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 233-253.
44.
Johns-PutraA. (2010). Ecocriticism, genre, and climate change: Reading the utopian vision of Kim Stanley Robinson’s Science in the capital trilogy. English Studies, 91, 744-760.
45.
KingsolverB. (2012). Flight behavior. New York, NY: HarperLuxe.
46.
KleinN. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Knopf Canada.
LevinK.CashoreB.BernsteinS.AuldG. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152.
51.
LuokkalaB. (2014). Exploring science through science fiction, science, and fiction. New York, NY: Springer.
McIntoshA. (2010). Foreword. In SkrinshireS. (Ed.), Future ethics: Climate change and the apocalyptic imagination (pp. vii-xi). London, England: Continuum.
56.
MendelsohnF. (2003). Introduction: Reading science fiction. In JamesE.MendelsohnF. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to science fiction (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
MilnerA. (2012). Locating science fiction. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press.
58.
O’NeillS.Nicholson-ColeS. (2009). Fear won’t do it: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 20, 355-379.
59.
ParrinderP. (2000). Introduction. In ParrinderP. (Ed.), Learning from other worlds: Estrangement, cognition and the politics of science fiction and Utopia (pp. 1-18). Liverpool, GBR: Liverpool University Press.
60.
PlumwoodV. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London, England: Routledge.
61.
QuetM. (2014). It will be a disaster! How people protest against things which have not yet happened. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 210-224.
62.
RichN. (2013). Odds against tomorrow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
63.
RiederJ. (2010). On defining science fiction, or not: Genre theory, science fiction and history. Science Fiction Studies, 37, 191-209.
64.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
65.
SelinC. (2007). Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 322, 196-220.
66.
SkrimshireS. (2010). Future ethics: Climate change and apocalyptic imagination. London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group.
67.
StablefordB. (1987). The sociology of science fiction. Wilbraham, MA: Van Volumes.
68.
SuvinD. (1979a). Metamorphoses of science fiction. London, England: Yale University Press.
69.
SuvinD. (1979b). The state of the art in science fiction theory: Determining and delimiting the genre. Science Fiction Studies, 6, 124-134.
70.
TaylorC. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14, 91-124.
71.
TaylorC. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. London, England: Duke University Press.
