Approaches to visual skilling from anthropology and STS have tended to highlight the forces of discipline and control in understanding how shared visual accounts of the world are created in the face of potential differences brought about by multi-sensorial perception. Drawing upon a range of observational and interview material from an immersion in naturalist training and biological recording activities between 2003 and 2009, I focus upon jizz, a distinct form of gestalt perception much coveted by naturalist communities in the UK. Jizz is described as a tacit and embodied way of seeing that instantaneously reveals the identity of a species, relying upon but simultaneously suspending the arduous and meticulous study of an organism’s diagnostic characteristics. I explore the potential and limitations of jizz to allow for both visual precision and an enchanted and varied form of encounter with nature. In so doing, I explore how the specific characteristics of wild, intangible and irreverent virtuoso performance work closely together with disciplining taxonomic standards. As such, discipline and irreverence work together, are mutually enabling, and allow for an accommodation rather than a segregation of potential difference brought about by perceptual variety.
AgarJ (2006) What difference did computers make?Social Studies of Science36(6): 869–907.
2.
AllenD (1986) The Botanists: A History of the Botanical Society of the British Isles through 150 Years. Winchester, Hants: St Paul’s Bibliographies.
3.
BleichmarD (2007) Training the naturalist’s eye in the eighteenth century: Perfect global visions and local blind spots. In: GrasseniC (ed.) Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
CowardT A (1922) Bird Haunts and Nature Memories. London and New York: Frederick Warne & Co. Ltd.
6.
DastonLParkK (2001) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.
7.
EllisRWatertonC (2004) Environmental citizenship in the making: The participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and Public Policy31(2): 95–101.
8.
EllisRWatertonC (2005) Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: The whereabouts of amateurs, professionals and nature in knowing biodiversity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23(5): 673–693.
9.
EllisRGrove-WhiteRVogelJWatertonC (2005) Nature: Who Knows?English Nature/Natural History Museum,Lancaster University.
10.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
GellA (1999 [1992]) The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In: The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams. London and New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press, 159–182. (Originally published in: Coote J and Shelton A (eds) (1992) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–63.)
12.
GibsonJJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
GoodwinC (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633.
14.
GoodwinC (1995) Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science25: 237–274
15.
GoodwinC (1997) The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In: ResnickLBSäljöRPontecorvoCBurgeB (eds) Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 111–140.
16.
GossePH (1902) The Romance of Natural History. New York: A.L. Burt Company Publishers.
17.
GrasseniC (2004) ‘Skilled vision’. An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics. Social Anthropology12(1): 1–15.
18.
GrasseniC (2007a) ‘Introduction’. In: GrasseniC (ed.) Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards. New York. Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1–19.
19.
GrasseniC (2007b) (ed.)Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards. New York. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
20.
HerzfeldM (2004) The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HerzfeldM (2007) Epilogue: Envisioning skills: insight, hindsight and second sight. In: GrasseniC (ed.) Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards. New York. Oxford: Berghahn Books, 207–216.
22.
IngoldT (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
23.
IngoldT (2010) Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. NCRM Working Paper #15, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
24.
JayM (1993) ‘That visual turn’. The advent of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture1(1): 87–92.
25.
KellerEF (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: WH Freeman.
26.
LaveJ (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LaveJWengerE (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LawrenceATurnhoutE (2010) Personal meaning in the public sphere: The standardisation and rationalisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies26: 353–360.
29.
LeadbeaterCMillerP (2004) The Pro-Am Revolution. London: DEMOS.
30.
LorimerH (2006) Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 497–518.
31.
LorimerJ (2007) Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25: 911–932.
32.
LynchMLawJ (1999) Pictures, texts, and objects: The literary language game of birdwatching. In: BiagioliM (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 317–341.
33.
MacDonaldH (2002) ‘What makes you a scientist is the way you look at things’: Ornithology and the observer 1930–1955. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences33: 53–77.
34.
MatlessD (2001) Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion Books.
35.
MerrillLL (1989) The Romance of Victorian Natural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
MolA (2007) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
37.
NicholsonE M (1932) The Art of Bird-Watching: A Practical Guide to Field Observation. London: Scribner.
38.
NussbaumM (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
OveringJ (1985) Today I shall call him ‘Mummy’: Multiple worlds and classificatory confusion. In: OveringJ (ed.) Reason and Morality. London and New York: Tavistock Publications, 152–179.
40.
PolanyiM (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
41.
PrenticeR (2005) The anatomy of a surgical simulation: The mutual articulation of bodies in and through the machine. Social Studies of Science35(6): 837–866.
42.
RafflesH (2010) Insectopedia. Pantheon Books.
43.
SecordA (2002) Botany on a plate: Pleasure and the power of pictures in promoting early nineteenth-century scientific knowledge. Isis93 (1): 28–57.
44.
StrathernM (1985) The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
45.
StrathernM (1991) Partial Connections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
ToogoodM (1996) Natural states: The culture and ecology of conservation, 1949–1973. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
48.
ToogoodM (2011) Modern observations: New ornithology and the science of ourselves, 1920–1945. Journal of Historical Geography37(3): 348–357.
49.
VerranH (1998) Re-imagining land ownership in Australia. Postcolonial Studies1(2): 237–254.
50.
VerranHChristieM (2007) Using/designing digital technologies of representation in Aboriginal Australian knowledge practices. Human Technology3(2): 214–227.
51.
WatsonHC (1852) Cybele Britannica; Or, British Plants and their Geographical Relations, 3rd edn. London: Longman.
