Through an analysis of videotaped interactions between healthcare professionals and pregnant women during ultrasound prenatal examinations in Japan, I explore some aspects of sequence organization in which an ultrasound real-time fetus is organized. The ultrasound demonstration of the fetal condition is an intrinsically interactional and distributed achievement. The ultrasound fetus is constructed as a real-time object in a particular technological environment; in this environment, the participants’ orientations to spatially separated operational fields, that is, the monitor screen and the woman’s abdomen, are exhibited and integrated in the actual course of interaction. In conclusion, the fundamental relation between organizational lived work in a technological environment and the observable features of technology will be suggested.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap III LC and Wenstrom KD ( 2001) Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill .
2.
Cussins C. ( 1996) Ontological choreography: Agency through objectification in infertility clinics. Social Studies of Science6: 575-610.
3.
Garfinkel H. ( 1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Garfinkel H. ( 2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Garfinkel H. and Wieder DL ( 1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In: Watson G and Seiler RM (eds) Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 175-206.
6.
Gibson JJ ( 1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum.
7.
Goodwin C. ( 1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606-633.
8.
Goodwin C. ( 2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction . Journal of Pragmatics32: 1489-1522.
9.
Goodwin C. ( 2003a) Body in action. In: Coupland J and Gwyn R (eds) Discourses of the Body. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan , 19-42.
10.
Goodwin C. ( 2003b) Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In: Goodwin C (ed.) Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 90-116.
11.
Goodwin C. ( 2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society18(1): 53-73.
12.
Hanson NR ( 1958) Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
13.
Heritage J. ( 2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Ford C, Fox B and Thompson S (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press, 196-224.
14.
Heritage J. and Raymond G. ( 2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15-38.
15.
Hindmarsh J. and Heath C. ( 2000a) Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction . Journal of Pragmatics32: 1855-1878.
16.
Hindmarsh J. and Heath C. ( 2000b) Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography29: 517-556.
17.
Husserl E. ( 2002) Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (Boyce Gibson WR, trans.). New York: Routledge .
18.
Jefferson G. ( 1973) A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica9(1): 47-96.
19.
Jefferson G. ( 2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction . In: Lerner GH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 13-23.
20.
Kamio A. ( 1997) Territory of Information. Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
21.
Kendon A. ( 1990) Conducting Interaction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
Livingston E. ( 2008) Ethnographies of Reason. Aldershot : Ashgate.
23.
Lynch M. ( 1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Lynch M. ( 1988) The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies11(2/3): 201-234.
25.
Lynch M. ( 1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Mitchell LM ( 2001) Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
Nishizaka A. ( 2000a) Seeing what one sees: Perception, emotion and activity. Mind, Culture and Activity7(1/2): 105-123.
28.
Nishizaka A. ( 2000b) The neglected situation of vision in experimental psychology . Theory & Psychology10(5): 579-604.
29.
Nishizaka A. ( 2007) Hand touching hand: Referential practice at a Japanese midwife house. Human Studies30(3): 199-217.
30.
Peräkylä A. ( 1998) Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly61(4): 301-320.
31.
Rapp R.1997Real-time fetus: The role of the sonogram in the age of monitored reproduction. In: Downey GL , Dumit J and Traweek S (eds) Cyborgs and Citadels: Anthropological Interventions into Techno-Humanism. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 31-48.
32.
Rapp R. ( 1999) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
33.
Sacks H. ( 1992) Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
34.
Sacks H., Schegloff EA and Jefferson G. ( 1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696-735.
Schegloff EA ( 1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70(6): 1075-1095.
37.
Schegloff EA ( 1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries. Sociological Inquiry50(3/4): 104-152.
38.
Schegloff EA ( 1998) Body torque. Social Research65(3): 535-596.
39.
Schegloff EA ( 2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Schegloff EA and Sacks H. ( 1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8: 289-237.
41.
Stivers T. ( 2004) ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research30: 260-293.
42.
Taylor JS ( 2008) The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
Terasaki AK ( 2004) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In: Lerner G (ed) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 171-223.
44.
Thompson C. ( 2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Whalen MR and Zimmerman DH ( 1990) Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society19(4): 465-492.
