Abstract
Are professors happy? Results from surveys generally conclude that they are, much like other professionals. But high satisfaction registered in surveys may measure the normatively-generated, public side of work that affirms the academic profession's official image. Based on a recent national study of academic physicists' careers, this paper presents results from in-depth interviews in which respondents at a range of US universities provided detailed accounts of their experience in, and identification with, academe. I study satisfaction from a different angle - through the self-doubts scientists have about their work and careers - and investigate how self-doubts may systematically differ across distinct `social worlds' of the academy. The findings suggest that satisfaction is a more nuanced component of work than previous studies have suggested. I explore satisfaction as a developmental process in which people learn how to narrate their careers in the socially accepted formats that their given world of academic work prescribes.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
