Scientific communities expect early career researchers (ECRs) to become intellectually independent and to develop longer-term research plans (individual research programs [IRPs]). How such programs emerge during the early career phase is still poorly understood. Drawing on semistructured interviews with German ECRs in plant biology, experimental physics, and early modern history, we show that the development of such a plan is a research process in itself. The processes leading to IRPs are conditioned by the fields’ epistemic practices for producing new knowledge. By linking the conditions under which ECRs work to the epistemic properties of their IRPs, we identify mechanisms that produce these programs and conditions facilitating or hindering the operation of these mechanisms.
ÅkerlindGerlese S.2005. “Postdoctoral Researchers: Roles, Functions and Career Prospects, and Development.” Higher Education Research & Development24 (1): 21–40.
2.
BäkerAgnes. 2015. “Non-Tenured Post-doctoral Researchers’ Job Mobility and Research Output: An Analysis of the Role of Research Discipline, Department Size, and Coauthors.” Research Policy44 (3): 634–650.
3.
BarleyStephen R.1989. “Careers, Identities, and Institutions: The Legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology.” In Handbook of Career Theory, edited by ArthurMichael B.HallDouglas T.LawrenceBarbara S.. 41–66. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BecherTony. 1990. “Physicists on Physics.” Studies in Higher Education15(1): 3–20.
5.
ChubinDaryl E.ConnollyTerence. 1982. “Research Trails and Science Policies.” In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, edited by EliasNorbertMartinsHerminioWhitleyRichard, 293–311. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
6.
DaltonGene W.ThompsonPaul H.PriceRaymond L.. 1977. “The Four Stages of Professional Careers—A New Look at Performance by Professionals.” Organizational Dynamics6 (1): 19–42.
7.
FochlerMaxFeltUlrikeMüllerRuth. 2016. “Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Life Scientists’ Work and Lives.” Minerva54 (2): 175–200.
8.
FujimuraJoan. 1987. “Constructing ‘Do-able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment.” Social Studies of Science17 (2): 257–293.
9.
GläserJochen. 2001. “Macrostructures, Careers and Knowledge Production: A Neoinstitutionalist Approach.” International Journal of Technology Management22 (7-8): 698–715.
10.
GläserJochenLaudelGrit. 2013. “Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations [96 paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research14. Accessed December 15, 2017. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254.
11.
GläserJochenLaudelGrit. 2015a. “A Bibliometric Reconstruction of Research Trails for Qualitative Investigations of Scientific Innovations.” Historical Social Research—Historische Sozialforschung40 (3): 299–330.
GläserJochenSpurlingThomas H.ButlerLinda. 2004. “Intraorganisational Evaluation: Are There ‘Least Evaluable Units’?” Research Evaluation13 (1): 19–32.
14.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
15.
HackettEdward J.2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science35 (5): 787–826.
16.
HermanowiczJoseph C.2012. “The Sociology of Academic Careers: Problems and Prospects.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by SmartJohn C.PaulsenMichael B., 207–248. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
17.
HöhleEster. 2015. “From Apprentice to Agenda-Setter: Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Contract Conditions on Roles in the Scientific Community.” Studies in Higher Education40 (8): 1423–1437.
18.
HolleyKarri A.2018. “The Longitudinal Career Experiences of Interdisciplinary Neuroscience PhD Recipients.” The Journal of Higher Education89 (1): 106–127.
19.
Jungbauer-GansMonikaGrossChristiane. 2013. “Determinants of Success in University Careers: Findings from the German Academic Labor Market.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie42 (1): 74–92.
20.
KerrAnneGarforthLisa. 2015. “Affective Practices, Care and Bioscience: A Study of Two Laboratories.” The Sociological Review64 (1): 3–20.
21.
Knorr-CetinaKarin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
LamAlicede CamposAndré. 2015. “‘Content to Be Sad’ or ‘Runaway Apprentice’? The Psychological Contract and Career Agency of Young Scientists in the Entrepreneurial University.” Human Relations68 (5): 811–841.
23.
LaudelGrit. 2017. “How do National Career Systems Promote or Hinder the Emergence of New Research Lines?” Minerva55: 341–369.
LaudelGritGläserJochen. 2008. “From Apprentice to Colleague: the Metamorphosis of Early Career Researchers.” Higher Education55 (3): 387–406.
26.
LaudelGritGläserJochen. 2014. “Beyond Breakthrough Research: Epistemic Properties of Research and their Consequences for Research Funding.” Research Policy43 (7): 1204–1216.
27.
LaudelGritLettkemannEricRamuzRaphaëlWedlinLindaWoolleyRichard. 2014. “Cold Atoms—Hot Research: High Risks, High Rewards in Five Different Authority Structures.” In Organizational Transformation And Scientific Change: The Impact Of Institutional Restructuring On Universities and Intellectual Innovation, edited by WhitleyRichardGläserJochen, 203–234. Bingley: Emerald Group.
28.
LongJ. ScottMcGinnisRobert. 1985. “The Effects of the Mentor on the Academic Career.” Scientometrics7 (3-6): 255–280.
29.
LutterMarkSchröderMartin. 2016. “Who Becomes a Tenured Professor, and Why? Panel Data Evidence from German Sociology, 1980-2013.” Research Policy45 (5): 999–1013.
30.
MayntzRenate. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences34 (2): 237–259.
31.
MillerJennifer M.FeldmanMaryann P.. 2015. “Isolated in the Lab: Examining Dissatisfaction with Postdoctoral Appointments.” The Journal of Higher Education86 (5): 697–724.
32.
MillerC. ChetGlickWilliam H.CardinalLaura B.. 2005. “The Allocation of Prestigious Positions in Organizational Science: Accumulative Advantage, Sponsored Mobility, and Contest Mobility.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour26 (5): 489–516.
33.
MüllerRuth. 2014a. “Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the Contemporary University: A Case Study of Changes in the Cultural Norms of Science.” Minerva52 (3): 329–349.
34.
MüllerRuth. 2014b. “Racing for What? Anticipation and Acceleration in the Work and Career Practices of Academic Life Science Postdocs.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research15: Art. 15. Accessed December 15, 2017. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1403150.
35.
NAS (National Academy of Science). 2014. The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
36.
NeradMaresiCernyJoseph. 1999. “Postdoctoral Patterns, Career Advancement, and Problems.” Science285 (3 September): 1533–1535.
37.
NRC (National Research Council). 2005. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
38.
Owen-SmithJason. 2001. “Managing Laboratory Work through Skepticism: Processes of Evaluation and Control.” American Sociological Review66 (3): 427–452.
39.
PowellKendall. 2015. “The Future of the Postdoc.” Nature520 (7546): 144–147.
40.
SauermannHenryRoachMichael. 2016. “Why Pursue the Postdoc Path?” Science352 (6286): 663–664.
41.
StephanPaulaMaJennifer. 2005. “The Increased Frequency and Duration of the Postdoctorate Career Stage.” The American Economic Review95 (2): 71–75.
42.
TraweekSharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
van der WeijdenIngeTeelkenChristineBoerMoniek deDrostMariske. 2016. “Career Satisfaction of Postdoctoral Researchers in Relation to Their Expectations for the Future.” Higher Education72 (1): 25–40.
44.
WaaijerCathelijn J. F.2015. “The Coming of Age of the Academic Career: Differentiation and Professionalization of German Academic Positions from the 19th Century to the Present.” Minerva53 (1): 43–67.
45.
WöhrerVeronika. 2014. “To Stay or to Go? Narratives of Early-Stage Sociologists about Persisting in Academia.” Higher Education Policy27 (4): 469–487.
46.
YangLijingWebberKaren L.. 2015. “A Decade beyond the Doctorate: the Influence of a US Postdoctoral Appointment on Faculty Career, Productivity, and Salary.” Higher Education70 (4): 667–687.
47.
ZabuskyStacia E.BarleyStephen R.. 1997. “‘You Can’t Be a Stone If You’re Cement’: Reevaluating the Emic Identities of Scientists in Organizations.” In Research in Organizational Behavior 19, edited by BarryM. StawLarryL. Cummings, 361–404. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
