Servant leadership has received considerable academic attention in recent years, and it highlights the service and assistance for all followers. However, given that the resources and energy of a leader are constantly limited, servant leaders need to balance fairness and efficiency to protect the interests of marginalized employees while boosting the enthusiasm of star employees to thus achieve optimal team outcomes. This study shifts the research perspective to the team level and innovatively explores how servant leadership balances the needs of individual subordinates and the goal of the team as a whole. Based on a survey including 109 leaders and 527 followers, this research finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between servant leadership and the team-level in-role performance and extra-role organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through team leader-member exchange differentiation (LMXD). Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AdamovicM (2021) The vicious cycle of unfairness and conflict in teams. International Journal of Conflict Management32(1): 126–157.
2.
Al-AsadiRMuhammedSAbidiO, et al. (2019) Impact of servant leadership on intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal40(4): 472–484.
3.
AllenSWinstonBETatoneGR, et al. (2018) Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership29(1): 123–140.
4.
BachrachDGRappTLOgilvieJ, et al. (2024) It’s about time (management)!: role overload as a bridge explaining relationships between helping, voice, and objective sales performance. Journal of Business Research172: 114295.
BatemanTSOrganDW (1983) Job-satisfaction and the good soldier - the relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal26(4): 587–595.
7.
BauerTNGreenSG (1996) Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal39(6): 1538–1567.
8.
BeehrTAIvanitskayaLHansenCP, et al. (2001) Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors. Journal of Organizational Behavior22(7): 775–788.
9.
BergeronDM (2007) The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost?Academy of Management Review32(4): 1078–1095.
10.
BergeronDMShippAJRosenB, et al. (2013) Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: the cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management39(4): 958–984.
11.
BhattiOKIrfanMOzturkAO, et al. (2022) Organizational inclusion through interaction of work meaningfulness and servant leadership: an artificial neural network approach. Cogent Business & Management9(1): 2059828.
12.
BowersKWRobertsonMParchmanML (2012) How inclusive leadership can help your practice adapt to change. Family Practice Management19(1): 8–11.
13.
BreevaartKBakkerABDemeroutiE (2014) Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior84(1): 31–38.
14.
BrislinR (1990) Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment. PsycCRITIQUES35(5): 79–85.
15.
CallMLNybergAJThatcherSMB (2015) Stargazing: an integrative conceptual review, theoretical reconciliation, and extension for star employee research. Journal of Applied Psychology100(3): 623–640.
16.
CartonAMCummingsJN (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review37(3): 441–470.
17.
ChenX-PEberlyMBChiangT-J, et al. (2014) Affective trust in Chinese leaders: linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management40(3): 796–819.
18.
ChinJL (2010) Introduction to the special issue on diversity and leadership. American Psychologist65(3): 150–156.
19.
ChiniaraMBenteinK (2018) The servant leadership advantage: when perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly29(2): 333–345.
20.
DoniaMBLRajaUPanaccioA, et al. (2016) Servant leadership and employee outcomes: the moderating role of subordinates' motives. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology25(5): 722–734.
21.
EarleyPCMosakowskiE (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal43(1): 26–49.
22.
ElcheDRuiz-PalominoPLinuesa-LangreoJ (2020) Servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating effect of empathy and service climate. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management32(6): 2035–2053.
23.
EllingtonJKDierdorffECRubinRS (2014) Decelerating the diminishing returns of citizenship on task performance: the role of social context and interpersonal skill. Journal of Applied Psychology99(4): 748–758.
24.
ErdoganBBauerTN (2010) Differentiated leader-member exchanges: the buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology95(6): 1104–1120.
25.
EvaNRobinMSendjayaS, et al. (2019) Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly30(1): 111–132.
26.
GaoRLiuB (2023) Avoiding the scenario of “The farmer and the snake”: the dark side of servant leadership and an intervention mechanism. Journal of Managerial Psychology38(4): 289–302.
27.
GotsisGGrimaniK (2016) The role of servant leadership in fostering inclusive organizations. The Journal of Management Development35(8): 985–1010.
28.
GraenGBUhlbienM (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership - development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years - applying a multilevel multidomain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
29.
GreenleafRK (1970) The Servant as Leader. The Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
30.
HackmanJR (1992) Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations. Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
HendersonDJLidenRCGlibkowskiBC, et al. (2009) LMX differentiation: a multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly20(4): 517–534.
32.
HochJEBommerWHDulebohnJH, et al. (2018) Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis (vol 44, pg 501, 2016). Journal of Management44(2): NP1–NP2.
33.
HoggMATerryDJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25: 121–140.
34.
HongyuNMingjianZQiangL, et al. (2012) Exploring relationship between authority leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in China: the role of collectivism. Chinese Management Studies6(2): 231–244.
35.
HuJLidenRC (2011) Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 851–862.
36.
HuberGPLewisK (2010) Cross-understanding: implications for group cognition and performance. Academy of Management Review35(1): 6–26.
37.
JohnsonCEHackmanMZ (2018) Leadership: A Communication Perspective. Waveland Press.
38.
KanferRAckermanPL (1989) Motivation and cognitive-abilities - an integrative aptitude treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology74(4): 657–690.
39.
KanferRAckermanPLMurthaTC, et al. (1994) Goal-setting, conditions of practice, and task-performance - a resource-allocation perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology79(6): 826–835.
40.
KehrHM (2003) Goal conflicts, attainment of new goals, and well-being among managers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology8(3): 195–208.
41.
KhanMMMubarikMSAhmedSS, et al. (2021) My meaning is my engagement: exploring the mediating role of meaning between servant leadership and work engagement. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal42(6): 926–941.
42.
LamCFWanWHRoussinCJ (2016) Going the extra mile and feeling energized: an enrichment perspective of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology101(3): 379–391.
43.
LanghofJGGuldenbergS (2020) Servant leadership: a systematic literature review-toward a model of antecedents and outcomes. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung34(1): 32–68.
44.
LapointeEVandenbergheC (2018) Examination of the relationships between servant leadership, organizational commitment, and voice and antisocial behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics148(1): 99–115.
45.
LeeALyubovnikovaJTianAW, et al. (2020) Servant leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology93(1): 1–44.
46.
LiNZhaoHHWalterSL, et al. (2015) Achieving more with less: extra milers' behavioral influences in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology100(4): 1025–1039.
47.
LiYFuFSunJ-M, et al. (2016) Leader-member exchange differentiation and team creativity: an investigation of nonlinearity. Human Relations69(5): 1121–1138.
48.
LiGRubensteinALLinW, et al. (2018) The curvilinear effect of benevolent leadership on team performance: the mediating role of team action processes and the moderating role of team commitment. Personnel Psychology71(3): 369–397.
49.
LiYLiNLiC, et al. (2020) The boon and bane of creative “stars”: a social network exploration of how and when team creativity is (and is not) driven by a star teammate. Academy of Management Journal63(2): 613–635.
50.
LiPSunJ-MTarisTW, et al. (2021) Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: a meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly32(1): 101458.
51.
LiaoSHHuDCChungHY (2009) The relationship between leader-member relations, job satisfaction and organizational commitment in international tourist hotels in Taiwan. International Journal of Human Resource Management20(8): 1810–1826.
52.
LiaoHLiuDLoiR (2010) Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal53(5): 1090–1109.
53.
LiaoCLeeHWJohnsonRE, et al. (2021) Serving you depletes me? A leader-centric examination of servant leadership behaviors. Journal of Management47(5): 1185–1218.
54.
LidenRCSparroweRTWayneSJ (1997) Leader-member exchange theory: the past and potential for the future. In: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, Vol. 15, 47–119.
55.
LidenRCErdoganBWayneSJ, et al. (2006) Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(6): 723–746.
56.
LidenRCWayneSJZhaoH, et al. (2008) Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly19(2): 161–177.
57.
LidenRCWayneSJLiaoC, et al. (2014) Servant leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal57(5): 1434–1452.
58.
LiuPAnXLiX (2022) You are an outsider! How and when observed leader incivility affect hospitality employees’ social categorization and deviant behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management106: 103273.
59.
LordRGBinningJFRushMC, et al. (1978) The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance21(1): 27–39.
60.
LvYYuX (2020) Effect of employee career satisfaction on organizational citizenship behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal48(10): 1–10.
61.
MaLQuQ (2010) Differentiation in leader–member exchange: a hierarchical linear modeling approach. The Leadership Quarterly21(5): 733–744.
62.
MartinRThomasGLegoodA, et al. (2018) Leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(2): 151–168.
63.
MathieuJEGallagherPTDomingoMA, et al. (2019) Embracing complexity: reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. In: MorgesonFAshfordSJAguinisH (eds) Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, 17–46.
64.
MeuserJDSmallfieldJ (2023) Servant leadership: the missing community component. Business Horizons66(2): 251–264.
65.
MiLXuTGanX, et al. (2019) How to motivate employees' environmental citizenship behavior through perceived interpersonal circle power? A new perspective from Chinese circle culture. Sustainability11(17): 4549.
66.
MorrisSSAlvarezSABarneyJB (2021) Dancing with the stars: the practical value of theory in managing star employees. Academy of Management Perspectives35(2): 248–264.
67.
NaumanSBhattiSHImamH, et al. (2022) How servant leadership drives project team performance through collaborative culture and knowledge sharing. Project Management Journal53(1): 17–32.
68.
NewmanASchwarzGCooperB, et al. (2017) How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics145(1): 49–62.
69.
NgTWFeldmanDC (2012) Employee voice behavior: a meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior33(2): 216–234.
70.
NiDWuSZhengMX, et al. (2024) Expatriate managers' personal financial insecurity indirectly thwarts team innovation: the role of state learning goal orientation. Human Resource Management63: 377–395.
71.
NishiiLHMayerDM (2009) Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology94(6): 1412–1426.
72.
PaikY (2016) Multilevel conceptualization of leader–member exchange processes: a comprehensive review. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal44(3): 401–413.
73.
PalumboR (2016) Challenging servant leadership in the nonprofit sector: the side effects of servant leadership. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership6(2): 81–98.
74.
ParetoV (1906) Manuale di Economia Politica. Societa Editrice, Vol. 13.
75.
ParrisDLPeacheyJW (2013) A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics113(3): 377–393.
76.
PlessNMMaakT (2004) Building an inclusive diversity culture: principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics54(2): 129–147.
77.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
78.
PodsakoffNPPodsakoffPMMacKenzieSB, et al. (2014) Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: a review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior35: S87–S119.
79.
PorterCOLHGogusCIYuRC-F (2010) When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? A resource allocation perspective. Small Group Research41(2): 221–248.
80.
QiuSDooleyL (2022) How servant leadership affects organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating roles of perceived procedural justice and trust. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal43(3): 350–369.
81.
Rabe-HeskethS (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata Press.
82.
ReimerNKSchmidKHewstoneM, et al. (2022) Self‐categorization and social identification: making sense of Us and them. Theories in Social Psychology, Second Edition: 273–295.
83.
RivkinWDiestelSSchmidtK-H (2014) The positive relationship between servant leadership and employees’ psychological health: a multi-method approach. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung28(1-2): 52–72.
84.
RobersonQPerryJL (2022) Inclusive leadership in thought and action: a thematic analysis. Group & Organization Management47(4): 755–778.
85.
Sa'adahNRijantiT (2022) The role of knowledge sharing, leader-member exchange (LMX) on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: an empirical study on public health center of pati 1, pati 2 and trangkil in Central Java. International Journal of Social and Management Studies3(1): 112–131.
86.
SalancikGRPfefferJ (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 224–253.
87.
ScanduraTAGraenGB (1984) Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology69(3): 428–436.
88.
SchaubroeckJLamSSKPengAC (2011) Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 863–871.
89.
SeersA (1989) Team-member exchange quality - a new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes43(1): 118–135.
90.
ShoreLMChungBG (2022) Inclusive leadership: how leaders sustain or discourage work group inclusion. Group & Organization Management47(4): 723–754.
91.
SiewekeJZhaoB (2015) The impact of team familiarity and team leader experience on team coordination errors: a panel analysis of professional basketball teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior36(3): 382–402.
92.
SlocumJWCronWLBrownSP (2002) The effect of goal conflict on performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies9(1): 77–89.
93.
SongCParkKRKangSW (2015) Servant leadership and team performance: the mediating role of knowledge-sharing climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal43(10): 1749–1760.
94.
SousaMVan DierendonckD (2016) Introducing a short measure of shared servant leadership impacting team performance through team behavioral integration. Frontiers in Psychology6: 2002.
95.
TajfelHTurnerJC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology. Psychology Press, pp. 276–293.
96.
TanCZhangJZhangY (2022) The mechanism of team-member exchange on knowledge hiding under the background of ?Guanxi?Journal of Business Research148: 304–314.
97.
van DierendonckDNuijtenI (2011) The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology26(3): 249–267.
98.
van DierendonckDStamDBoersmaP, et al. (2014) Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly25(3): 544–562.
99.
WalloAEllstromP-EKockH (2013) Leadership as a balancing act between performance- and development-orientation A study of managers’ and co-workers’ understanding of leadership in an industrial organisation. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal34(3): 222–237.
100.
WalumbwaFOMuchiriMKMisatiE, et al. (2018) Inspired to perform: a multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(3): 249–261.
101.
WangYLauDC (2022) How and why job crafting influences creative performance? A resource allocation explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management39(4): 1561–1587.
102.
WangZGuanCCuiT, et al. (2021) Servant leadership, team reflexivity, coworker support climate, and employee creativity: a multilevel perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies28(4): 465–478.
103.
WilderomCPMvan den BergPTWiersmaUJ (2012) A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance. The Leadership Quarterly23(5): 835–848.
104.
XieL (2020) The impact of servant leadership and transformational leadership on learning organization: a comparative analysis. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal41(2): 220–236.
105.
XuHWayneSJWangLC, et al. (2022) LMX differentiation as a double‐edged sword: a social hierarchy perspective for understanding the beneficial and detrimental effects of LMX differentiation on team performance. Personnel Psychology77: 713–745.
106.
YangJLiuHGuJ (2017) A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity the roles of self-efficacy and power distance. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal38(5): 610–629.
107.
YehS-CJWangWCWangYH, et al. (2022) How followers' perception of insider status influences the relationship between servant leadership and work attitude?International Journal of Organizational Leadership11(2): 127–140.
108.
ZhangYZhengYZhangL, et al. (2021) A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: the moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management38(1): 371–400.
109.
ZhengGGZhouYWuW (2024) Followers matter: understanding the emotional exhaustion of servant leadership. Applied Psychology73(1): 215–239.
110.
ZhouDLiuS-MXinH (2020) Servant leadership behavior: effects on leaders’ work-family relationship. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal48(3): 1–12.
