In today’s volatile business environment, team-based commitment remained important and helped organization to perform better and be more adaptable. Therefore, team-based structures are increasingly important to organization, in part that due to their ability to leverage team leadership and individuals’ abilities to work collaboratively. This study contributes to what is known about team-based structures by examining the underlying process of team-member exchange as a mechanism for linking ethical leadership and team commitment. Drawing on social identity and social exchange theories, we develop a mediation model and demonstrate the link between team-member exchange, ethical leadership, and team commitment. The model was tested on a sample of 100 team leaders and 370 team members in the Malaysia aviation industry. Results from a hierarchical linear modeling analysis provided support for the model. That is, ethical leadership was positively related to team commitment through team-member exchange, conceptualized and operationalized as team members sharing and exchanging information, helping each other, and recognizing each other’s contributions towards the team. The study contributes to the literature on ethical leadership and enhances our understanding of the relationship between leadership and team behavior through team-member exchange.
BakarHAConnaughtonSL (2022) Ethical leadership, perceived leader–member ethical communication and organizational citizenship behavior: development and validation of a multilevel model. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal43(1): 96–110.
2.
BakarHAConnaughtonSL (2023) Ethical leadership communications scale: development and validation of a measure and multi-level test. Journal of General Management03063070231170702.
3.
BakarHAOmillion-HodgesL (2020) The mediating role of relative communicative behavior on the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational identification. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal41(1): 52–72.
4.
BanksGCGootyJRossRL, et al. (2018) Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: a review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly29(1): 236–251.
5.
BernerthJBAguinisH (2016) A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology69(1): 229–283.
6.
BlakeABLuuVHPetrenkoOV, et al. (2022) Let’s agree about nice leaders: a literature review and meta-analysis of agreeableness and its relationship with leadership outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly33(1): 101593.
7.
BliesePDMaltarichMAHendricksJL, et al. (2019) Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation. Journal of Applied Psychology104(2): 293–302.
8.
BrownMETreviñoLK (2006) Ethical leadership: a review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly17(6): 595–616.
9.
BrownMETreviñoLK (2014) Do role models matter? an investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics122(4): 587–598.
10.
BrownMETreviñoLKHarrisonDA (2005) Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97(2): 117–134.
11.
BuchananB (1974) Government managers, business executives, and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review34(4): 339–347.
12.
ByronKKeemSDardenT, et al. (2023) Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: a meta‐analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation. Personnel Psychology76(1): 249–278.
13.
CaiJZhengLZhuangF, et al. (2023) Trust in supervisor and employee creativity: the mediating role of information sharing. Psychological Reports332941231191716. doi: 10.1177/00332941231191716.
14.
CarterKMMeadBAStewartGL, et al. (2019) Reviewing work team design characteristics across industries: combining meta-analysis and comprehensive synthesis. Small Group Research50(1): 138–188.
15.
ConwayJMLanceCE (2010) What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology25(3): 325–334.
16.
CostaACFulmerCAAndersonNR (2018) Trust in work teams: an integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(2): 169–184.
17.
DebusMEProbstTMKönigCJ, et al. (2012) Catch me if I fall! enacted uncertainty avoidance and the social safety net as country-level moderators in the job insecurity–job attitudes link. Journal of Applied Psychology97(3): 690–698.
18.
Den HartogDNDe HooghAH (2024) Cross-cultural leadership: what we know, what we need to know, and where we need to go. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior11(1): 535–566.
19.
EllemersNde GilderDVan Den HeuvelH (1998) Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology83(5): 717–730.
20.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7(2): 117–140.
21.
HarveyJFCromwellJRJohnsonKJ, et al. (2023) The dynamics of team learning: harmony and rhythm in teamwork arrangements for innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly68(3): 601–647.
22.
HochJEBommerWHDulebohnJH, et al. (2018) Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? a meta-analysis. Journal of Management44(2): 501–529.
23.
HoffmanLWaltersRW (2022) Catching up on multilevel modeling. Annual Review of Psychology73(1): 659–689.
24.
HoustonLFerrisDLCrossleyC (2024) Does value similarity matter? influence of ethical leadership on employee engagement and deviance. Group & Organization Management49(4): 943–976.
25.
JohnsG (2024) The context deficit in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly35(1): 101755.
26.
KimDVandenbergheC (2021) Ethical leadership and organizational commitment: the dual perspective of social exchange and empowerment. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal42(6): 976–987.
27.
KimKYAtwaterLJollyP, et al. (2021) Supportive leadership and job performance: contributions of supportive climate, team-member exchange (TMX), and group-mean TMX. Journal of Business Research134(3): 661–674.
28.
KimDChoiDSonSY (2024) Does ethical voice matter? examining how peer team leader ethical voice and role modeling relate to ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics192(1): 113–128.
29.
KleinHJMolloyJCBrinsfieldCT (2012) Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of Management Review37(1): 130–151.
30.
LaiFYLinCCLuSC, et al. (2021) The role of team–member exchange in proactive personality and employees’ proactive behaviors: the moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies28(4): 429–443.
31.
LauRSCheungGWCooper–ThomasHD (2021) The influence of dispositions and shared leadership on team–member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology36(3): 258–271.
32.
LeeESParkTYKooB (2015) Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin141(5): 1049–1080.
33.
Lehmann-WillenbrockNHungH (2024) A multimodal social signal processing approach to team interactions. Organizational Research Methods27(3): 477–515.
34.
LordRGDayDVZaccaroSJ, et al. (2017) Leadership in applied psychology: three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology102(3): 434–451.
35.
LyuBLiaoXYangY (2022) Relationships between temporal leadership, transactive memory systems and team innovation performance. Psychology Research and Behavior Management15: 2543–2559. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S380989.
36.
MartinSREmichKJMcCleanEJ, et al. (2022) Keeping teams together: how ethical leadership moderates the effects of performance on team efficacy and social integration. Journal of Business Ethics176(1): 127–139.
37.
McNeishDStapletonLMSilvermanRD (2017) On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychological Methods22(1): 114–140.
38.
MeyerJPAllenNJ (1984) Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology69(3): 372–378.
39.
MeyerJPAllenNJ (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review1(1): 61–89.
40.
MorgesonFPDeRueDSKaramEP (2010) Leadership in teams: a functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management36(1): 5–39.
41.
MowdayRTSteersRMPorterLW (1979) The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior14(2): 224–247.
42.
PakJKimS (2018) Team manager’s implementation, high performance work systems intensity, and performance: a multilevel investigation. Journal of Management44(7): 2690–2715.
43.
PengJCLinJ (2017) Mediators of ethical leadership and group performance outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology32(7): 484–496.
44.
SeersAPettyMMCashmanJF (1995) Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: a naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management20(1): 18–38.
45.
SongLJZhangDLyuB, et al. (2024) Chinese leadership. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.376.
46.
SwiderBWYangJWangM (2024) The use of trajectories in management research: a review and insights for future research. Journal of Management50(6): 2012–2045.
47.
TabakFShkolerOLebronM, et al. (2024) Team-member and leader-member exchange, engagement, and turnover intentions: implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International27(2): 169–194.
48.
TajfelH (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33(1): 1–39.
49.
TanoAYManuFAOsei-FrimpongK, et al. (2023) Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: the moderator effects of subordinates’ horizontal collectivism orientation and team-member exchange. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management23(3): 507–530.
50.
TremblayMGaudetMCVandenbergheC (2019) The role of group-level perceived organizational support and collective affective commitment in the relationship between leaders’ directive and supportive behaviors and group-level helping behaviors. Personnel Review48(2): 417–437.
51.
TuYLuXChoiJN, et al. (2019) Ethical leadership and team-level creativity: mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of supervisor support for creativity. Journal of Business Ethics159(2): 551–565.
52.
WallerMJOkhuysenGASaghafianM (2016) Conceptualizing emergent states: a strategy to advance the study of group dynamics. The Academy of Management Annals10(1): 561–598.
53.
WangLCHollenbeckJR (2019) LMX in team‐based contexts: TMX, authority differentiation, and skill differentiation as boundary conditions for leader reciprocation. Personnel Psychology72(2): 271–290.
