This study analyzes whether firms face a tradeoff in responding to pressures of shareholders versus stakeholders in their quest for supply chain management excellence. Are firms that are recognized and rewarded for their supply chain management practices less likely than other firms to have a strong record in community relations, product qualities, employee relations, environmental sustainability and diversity measures? To answer this question, the study utilizes event study, OLS regression and panel data analyses of firms receiving a Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 ranking and a comparative sample of these same firms in non-ranked years. The findings indicate that shareholders react positively to a Gartner ranking, suggesting that ranked firms receive significant incentives to pursue recognition. Additionally, positive stakeholder practices are significantly stronger for firms ranked versus those not ranked. These findings suggest that firms can successfully navigate the pressures congruent with both shareholder and stakeholder priorities through supply chain excellence.
AronowSBurkettMRomanoJ, et al. (2015) 2015 supply chain top 25: the art and science. Supply Chain Management Review20(10): 10–21.
5.
ArthurMMCookA (2004) Taking stock of work-family initiatives: how announcements of “family-friendly” human resource decisions affect shareholder value. ILR Review57(4): 599–613.
6.
ArthurMMCookA (2009) Shareholder returns for a catalyst award. Group & Organization Management34(4): 432–448.
BhaskarSTanJBogersML, et al. (2020) At the epicenter of COVID-19–the tragic failure of the global supply chain for medical supplies. Frontiers in Public Health8: 821.
12.
BîzoiA (2016) Ethics and sustainability - the silver lining of supply chains. Revista de Management Comparat International17(3): 250–260.
13.
BrownSJWarnerJB (1985) Using daily stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics14(1): 3–31.
14.
CaddenTHumphreysPMchughM (2010) The influence of organisational culture on strategic supply chain relationship success. Journal of General Management36(2): 37–64.
15.
CarpenterJYermackD (2013) Executive Compensation and Shareholder Value: Theory and Evidence. Dordrecht: Springer US (The New York University Salomon Center Series on Financial Markets and Institutions.
16.
ChenaridesLManfredoMRichardsTJ (2021) Covid‐19 and food supply chains. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy43(1): 270–279.
17.
ChengBIoannouISerafeimG (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal35(1): 1–23.
18.
ChristopherMRyalsL (1999) Supply chain strategy: its impact on shareholder value. The International Journal of Logistics Management10(1): 1–10.
19.
ClarksonME (1995) A Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review20(1): 92–117.
20.
CookAGlassC (2011) Leadership change and shareholder value: how markets react to the appointments of women. Human Resource Management50(4): 501.
21.
CookAGlassC (2014) Do diversity reputation signals increase share value?Human Resource Development Quarterly25(4): 471–491.
22.
D’avanzoRvon LewinskiHVan WassenhoveL (2003) The link between supply chain and financial performance. Supply Chain Management Review7(11–12): 40–47.
23.
DaughertyPJStankTPEllingerAE (1998) Leveraging logistics/distribution capabilities: The effect of logistics service on market share. Journal Of Business Logistics19(2): 35–51.
24.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
25.
DohJHowtonSDHowtonSW, et al. (2010) Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management36(6): 1461–1485.
DonagheyJReineckeJNiforouC, et al. (2014) From employment relations to consumption relations: balancing labor governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management53(2): 229–252.
28.
EllingerANatarajarathinamMAdamsFG, et al. (2011) Supply chain management competency and firm financial success. Journal of Business Logistics32(3): 214–226.
29.
EllingerAShinHNorthingtonWM, et al. (2012) The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Supply Chain Management-An International Journal17(3): 249–262.
GatesGEwingJRussellK, et al. (2017) How Volkswagen has grappled with its diesel scandal. The New York Times, 11 January.
42.
GilmoreD (2015) Understanding the 2015 gartner top 25 supply chain rankings. Supply Chain DigestMay.
43.
GlassCCookAIngersollAR (2016) Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment25(7): 495–511.
44.
GopalAGaoG (2009) Certification in the Indian offshore IT services industry. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management11(3): 471–492.
45.
HannonJMMilkovichGT (1996) The effect of human resource reputation signals on share prices: an event study. Human Resource Management35(3): 405–424.
46.
HemphillTAKelleyKECullariF (2021) The Ascendancy of Stakeholder Capitalism: what is its meaning for corporate governance?Journal of General Management46(4): 262–273.
47.
HendricksKBSinghalVR (2005) An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management14(1): 35–52.
48.
HillmanAJKeimGD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line?Strategic Management Journal22(2): 125–139.
49.
HongSJNajmiH (2020) The Relationships between supply chain capability and shareholder value using financial performance indicators. Sustainability12(8): 3130.
50.
HsiaoC (1985) Benefits and limitations of panel data. Econometric Reviews4(1): 121–174.
51.
HutchinsMJSutherlandJW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production16(15): 1688–1698.
52.
JungJ (2015) Shareholder value and workforce downsizing, 1981-2006. Social Forces93(4): 1335–1368.
53.
KauppiK (2013) Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research. International Journal of Production and Operations Management33(10): 1318–1345.
54.
KingBSouleS (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: the effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly52(3): 413–442.
55.
KubotaYKlaymanB (2013) Japan Carmakers Recall 3.4 Million Vehicles for Takata Airbag Flaw. Tokyo/Detroit: Reuters 11 April.
56.
LambertDMBurdurogluR (2000) Measuring and selling the value of logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management11(1): 1–18.
57.
LockeRMRissingBAPalT (2013) Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(3): 519–552.
58.
LosbichlerHMahmoodiFRothboeckM (2008) Shareholder value from supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal9: 82–92.
59.
MacKinlayAC (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature35(1): 13–39.
60.
McWilliamsASiegelD (1997) Issues in the use of the event study methodology: a critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies. Organizational Research Methods2(4): 340–365.
61.
MelnykSADavisEWSpekmanRE, et al. (2010) Outcome-driven supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review51(2): 33–38.
62.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
63.
MinowN (1999) Corporate charity: An oxymoron?The Business Lawyer54(3): 997–1005.
64.
MizruchiMSFeinLC (1999) The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly44(4): 653–683.
65.
PagellMShevchenkoA (2014) Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management50(1): 44–55.
66.
PagellMWuZ (2009) Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management45(2): 37–56.
67.
ParsonsT (1960) Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
68.
PorterMEKramerMR (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review89(1).
69.
PrabhuJStewartDW (2001) Signaling strategies in competitive interaction: building reputations and hiding the truth. Journal of Marketing Research38(1): 62–72.
70.
ReichR (2015) Saving Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
71.
RoeMJ (2001) The shareholder wealth maximization norm and industrial organization. University of Pennsylvania Law Review149(6): 2063.
72.
RogersKWPurdyLSafayeniF, et al. (2007) A supplier development program: rational process or institutional image construction?Journal of Operations Management25(2): 556–572.
73.
RoseCSBielbyWT (2011) Race at the top: how companies shape the inclusion of African Americans on their boards in response to institutional pressures. Social Science Research40(3): 841–859.
74.
SauderMLancasterR (2006) Do rankings matter? The effects of U.S. News & world report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law & Society Review40(1): 105–134.
75.
SchwietermanMAMillerJKnemeyerAM, et al. (2020) Do supply chain exemplars have more or less dependent suppliers?Journal of Business Logistics41(2): 149–173.
SemenovaNHasselLG (2015) On the validity of environmental performance metrics. Journal of Business Ethics132(2): 249–258.
78.
SeuringSMüllerM (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production16(15): 1699–1710.
79.
SharfmanM (1996) The construct validity of the kinder, lydenberg & domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics15(3): 287–296.
80.
SinB (2016) Latest Foxconn Worker Deaths Build Case for Apple to Move Operations from China. August: Forbes.
81.
SinghNP (2021) Managing the adverse effect of supply chain risk on corporate reputation: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility practices. Journal of General Management46(4): 251–261.
82.
SpekmanRSpearJKamauffJ (2001) Supply chain competency: learning as a key component. Supply Chain Management:An International Journal7(1): 41–55.
83.
StiglitzJ (2012) The Price of Inequality. New York: Penguin Books Limited.
84.
TabuchiH (2016) A Cheaper Airbag, And Takata’s Road to a Deadly Crisis. New York: The New York Times 26August.
85.
WaddockSAGravesSB (1997a) The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal18(4): 303–319.
86.
WaddockSAGravesSB (1997b) Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: are they synonymous?Business & Society36(3): 250–279.
87.
WallsJLBerronePPhanPH (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?Strategic Management Journal33(8): 885–913.
88.
WestphalJDGulatiRShortellSM (1997) Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly42(2): 366–394.
89.
WheelerDColbertBFreemanRE (2003) Focusing on value: reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of General Management28(3): 1–28.
90.
WheelerDDaviesR (2004) Gaining goodwill: developing stakeholder approaches to corporate governance. Journal of General Management30(2): 51–74.
91.
WrightCMSmithMEWrightBG (2007) Hidden costs associated with stakeholders in supply management. Academy of Management Perspectives21(3): 64–82.
92.
WrightPFerrisSPHillerJS, et al. (1995) Competitiveness through management of diversity: effects on stock price valuation. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 272–287.
93.
YardleyJ (201322 May) Report on Deadly Factory Collapse in Bangladesh Finds Widespread Blame. The New York Times.
94.
ZajacEJWestphalJD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review69(3): 433–457.
95.
ZhuQSarkisJ (2007) The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research45(18): 4333–4355.
96.
ZhuQSarkisJLaiK (2013) Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management19(2): 106–117.
