Harmonic expectations are actively connected with the syntactic and asymmetric organisation of Western tonal harmony. Their violation has been associated with concepts such as tension, surprise, completeness, or harmonic relatedness and coherence, among others. The aim of this study is to examine whether the violation of expected chord directionality is related to perceived consonance/dissonance (C/D) of entire short chord sequences, focusing on the impact of horizontal manipulations, whilst maintaining identical the vertical content (average C/D of the chords comprising a short sequence). We conducted two experiments, with chord progressions presented in an original and retrograde arrangement. Their harmonic content ranged from strictly diatonic and tonal to highly chromatic or 12-tone. Participants reported the perceived consonance/dissonance of each sequence. Findings suggest that chord directionality indeed affects C/D evaluation in tonal sequences as opposed to atonal sequences. In addition, chord directionality appears to play hardly any role when a clear tonal hierarchy is missing, that is, in the absence of a perfect cadence that unambiguously points to a specific tonal centre of equilibrium and closure. Cadences (related to closure effects) are privileged compared with other harmonic progressions as an influencing factor to consonance perception. Voice leading appears to have some influence in such evaluations.
AldwellE.SchachterC.CadwalladerA. C. (2019). Harmony & voice leading (5th ed). Cengage.
2.
ArthursY.TimmersR. (2016). On the fluidity of consonance and dissonance: The influence of musical context. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000102
3.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
4.
BigandE.DelbéC.Poulin-CharronnatB.LemanM.TillmannB. (2014). Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, Article 94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00094
5.
BigandE.ParncuttR. (1999). Perceiving musical tension in long chord sequences. Psychological Research, 62, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050053
6.
BigandE.ParncuttR.LerdahlF. (1996). Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: The influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 125–141.
7.
BigandE.TillmannB.Poulin-CharronnatB.ManderlierD. (2005). Repetition priming: Is music special?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(8), 1347–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000601
8.
CaplinW. E. (2004). The classical cadence: Conceptions and misconceptions. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 57(1), 51–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/jams.2004.57.1.51
9.
DanielP. (2008). Psychoacoustical roughness. In HavelockD.KuwanoS.VorländerM. (Eds.), Handbook of signal processing in acoustics (pp. 263–274). Springer.
10.
De ClercqT.TemperleyD. (2011). A corpus analysis of rock harmony. Popular Music, 30(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S026114301000067X
11.
DellacherieD.RoyM.HuguevilleL.PeretzI.SamsonS. (2011). The effect of musical experience on emotional self-reports and psychophysiological responses to dissonance. Psychophysiology, 48(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01075.x
12.
DibbenN. (1994). The cognitive reality of hierarchic structure in tonal and atonal music. Music Perception, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285753
13.
DibbenN. (1996). Perceptual facilities in atonal music: Implications for the listening experience. In PennycookCosta-GioniE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 55–58). McGill University.
14.
EerolaT.LahdelmaI. (2021). The anatomy of consonance/dissonance: Evaluating acoustic and cultural predictors across multiple datasets with chords. Music and Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043211030471
15.
EerolaT.LahdelmaI. (2022). Register impacts perceptual consonance through roughness and sharpness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 800–808. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02033-5
FechnerG. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of Psychophysics]. Breitkopf & Härtel.
18.
GiannosK.AthanasopoulosG.CambouropoulosE. (2021). Cross-modal associations between harmonic dissonance and visual roughness. Music and Science, 4, Article 1055484. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043211055484
19.
GosselinN.SamsonS.AdolphsR.NoulhianeM.RoyM.HasbounD.BaulacM.PeretzI. (2006). Emotional responses to unpleasant music correlates with damage to the parahippocampal cortex. Brain, 129(10), 2585–2592. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl240
20.
Guillotel-NothmannC. (2018). Conditional asymmetry and spontaneous asymmetry of harmonic progressions: The changing status of the directional tendency of root progressions in madrigal cycles from Verdelot to Monteverdi (c. 1530–1638). Music Theory Online, 24(4), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.30535/MTO.24.4.8
21.
HarrisonP. M. C.PearceM. T. (2018). Dissociating sensory and cognitive theories of harmony perception through computational modeling. In ParncuttR.SattmannS. (Eds.), Proceedings of ICMPC15/ESCOM10 (pp. 194–199). Centre for Systematic Musicology, University of Graz.
22.
HarrisonP. M. C.PearceM. T. (2020). Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition. Psychological Review, 127(2), 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000169
23.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press.
24.
HutchinsonW.KnopoffL. (1987). The clustering of temporal elements in melody. Music Perception, 4(3), 281–303.
KrumhanslC. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford University Press.
27.
LahdelmaI.EerolaT. (2016a). Mild dissonance preferred over consonance in single chord perception. I-perception, 7(3), Article 655812. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516655812
28.
LahdelmaI.EerolaT. (2016b). Single chords convey distinct emotional qualities to both naïve and expert listeners. Psychology of Music, 44(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614552006
29.
LahdelmaI.EerolaT. (2020). Cultural familiarity and musical expertise impact the pleasantness of consonance/dissonance but not its perceived tension. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65615-8
30.
LarsonS. (2012). Musical forces: Motion, metaphor, and meaning in music. Indiana University Press.
31.
LemanM. (2000). An auditory model of the role of short-term memory in probe-tone ratings. Music Perception, 17(4), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285830
32.
LerdahlF. (1988). Tonal pitch space. Music Perception, 5(3), 315–345.
33.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.
34.
LouiP.WesselD. (2007). Harmonic expectation and affect in Western music: Effects of attention and training. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(7), 1084–1092.
ParncuttR.HairG. (2011). Consonance and dissonance in music theory and psychology: Disentangling dissonant dichotomies. https://doi.org/10.4407/jims.2011.11.002
40.
PatrickM. T.CohnN.MertusJ.BlumsteinS. E. (2023). Sequences in harmony: Cognitive interactions between musical and visual narrative structure. Acta Psychologica, 238, Article 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103981
41.
PeretzI.BloodA. J.PenhuneV.ZatorreR. (2001). Cortical deafness to dissonance. Brain, 124, 928–940.
42.
PistonW.DeVotoM. (1987). Harmony (5th Ed.). W. W. Norton.
43.
Poulin-CharronnatB.BigandE.MadurellF. (2005). The influence of voice leading on harmonic priming. Music Perception, 22(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.22.4.613
44.
PressnitzerD.McAdamsS.WinsbergS.FinebergJ. (2000). Perception of musical tension for nontonal orchestral timbres and its relation to psychoacoustic roughness. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212061
45.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org
RohrmeierM. (2020). The syntax of Jazz harmony: Diatonic tonality, phrase structure, and form. Music Theory and Analysis, 7(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.11116/MTA.7.1.1
48.
RohrmeierM.MossF. C. (2021). A formal model of extended tonal harmony. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Society for Music Information retrieval conference (pp. 569–578). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5624635.
49.
RosnerB.NarmourE. (1992). Harmonic closure: Music theory and perception. Music Perception, 9, 383–412.
50.
SchwitzgebelE.WhiteC. W. (2021). Effects of chord inversion and bass patterns on harmonic expectancy in musicians. Music Perception, 39(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2021.39.1.41
51.
SearsD. R. W. (2015). The perception of cadential closure. In NeuwirthM.BergéP. (Eds.), What is a cadence? theoretical and analytical perspectives on cadences in the classical repertoire (pp. 253–285). Leuven University Press.
52.
SearsD. R. W.SpitzerJ.CaplinW. E.McAdamsS. (2018). Expecting the end: Continuous expectancy ratings for tonal cadences. Psychology of Music, 48(3), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618803676
53.
SearsD. R. W.VerbetenJ. E.PercivalH. M. (2023). Does order matter? Harmonic priming effects for scrambled tonal chord sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(7), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/XHP0001103
54.
SteedmanM. J. (1984). A generative grammar for Jazz chord sequences. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285282
55.
StrausJ. N. (2005). Introduction to post-tonal theory (3rd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
TillmannB.BigandE. (2001). Global context effect in normal and scrambled musical sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1185
58.
TillmannB.Lebrun-GuillaudG. (2006). Influence of tonal and temporal expectations on chord processing and on completion judgments of chord sequences. Psychological Research, 70(5), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00426-005-0222-0
59.
TymoczkoD. (2011). A geometry of music: Harmony and counterpoint in the extended common practice. Oxford University Press.
60.
TymoczkoD.MeeùsN. (2003). Progressions fondamentales, fonctions, degrés: une grammaire de l’harmonie tonale élémentaire [Root progressions, functions, degrees: a grammar of elementary tonal harmony]. Musurgia, 10(3–4), 35–64.
VassilakisP. (2001). Perceptual and physical properties of amplitude fluctuations and their musical significance [PhD Thesis]. University of California.
63.
VuvanD. T.HughesB. (2019). Musical style affects the strength of harmonic expectancy. Music & Science, 2, Article 816066. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318816066
64.
WallL.LieckR. N. M.RohrmeierR. (2020). The impact of voice leading and harmony on musical expectancy. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 5933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61645-4
65.
WangY. S.ShenG. Q.GuoH.TangX. L.HamadeT. (2013). Roughness modelling based on human auditory perception for sound quality evaluation of vehicle interior noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332(16), 3893–3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.02.030
66.
ZhangJ. D.SchubertE. (2019). A single item measure for identifying musician and nonmusician categories based on measures of musical sophistication. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36(5), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2019.36.5.457
