This study aimed to investigate the effects of amateur choir experience on “forced-attention” dichotic listening performance in older adults. Twenty older adults with choir experience and 20 without such experience were recruited, along with a group of 20 younger adults as the baseline. Participants were instructed to complete the dichotic listening task based on consonant-vowel (CV) syllables in four attentional conditions, that is, non-forced, forced-left, forced-right, and divided attention conditions. The results showed that choir experience may offset age-related deficits in temporal processing, inhibitory control, and divided attention in the non-forced, forced-left, and divided attention conditions, respectively. But in the forced-right condition where the orienting process was required, two groups of older adults performed similarly, comparable with the younger group. Our findings support the OPERA-e hypothesis and underscore the effects of amateur musical activities against declines in temporal processing, inhibitory control, and divided attention in aging populations.
AbrahanV. D.ShifresF.JustelN. (2019). Cognitive benefits from a musical activity in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00652
2.
AlainC.MoussardA.SingerJ.LeeY.BidelmanG. M.MorenoS. (2019). Music and visual art training modulate brain activity in older adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, Article 182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00182
3.
AlbouyP.Benjamin1L.MorillonB.ZatorreR. J. (2020). Distinct sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulation supports brain asymmetry for speech and melody. Science, 367(6481), 1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAZ3468
4.
American National Standards Institute. (2010). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2010).
5.
AndrewsE.EierudC.BanksD.HarshbargerT.MichaelA.RammellC. (2021). Effects of lifelong musicianship on white matter integrity and cognitive brain reserve. Brain Sciences, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/BRAINSCI11010067
6.
AngueraJ. A.VolponiJ. J.SimonA. J.GallenC. L.RolleC. E.Anguera-SinglaR.PitschE. A.ThompsonC. J.GazzaleyA. (2022). Integrated cognitive and physical fitness training enhances attention abilities in older adults. Npj Aging, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-022-00093-y
BeverT. G. (1975). Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: Holistic and analytic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263(1), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.1975.TB41589.X
9.
BeverT. G.ChiarelloR. J. (2009). Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 21(1), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2009.21.1.94
10.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.46) [Computer Program]. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed May 20, 2021).
11.
BoumaA.GootjesL. (2011). Effects of attention on dichotic listening in elderly and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Cognition, 76(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.008
12.
BoutzoukasE. M.O’SheaA.AlbizuA.EvangelistaN. D.HausmanH. K.KraftJ. N.Van EttenE. J.BharadwajP. K.SmithS. G.SongH.PorgesE. C.HishawA.DeKoskyS. T.WuS. S.MarsiskeM.AlexanderG. E.CohenR.WoodsA. J. (2021). Frontal white matter hyperintensities and executive functioning performance in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 672535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.672535
13.
BrydenM. P.MunhallK.AllardF. (1983). Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 18, 236–248. https://doi.org/101016/0093934X83900184
ChangY. H.WuI. C.HsiungC. A. (2021). Reading activity prevents long-term decline in cognitive function in older people: Evidence from a 14-year longitudinal study. International Psychogeriatrics, 33(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000812
16.
ChauvinJ. J.GillebertC. R.RohenkohlG.HumphreysG. W.NobreA. C. (2016). Temporal orienting of attention can be preserved in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 31(5), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/PAG0000105
17.
ClarkI. N.TaylorN. F.BakerF. A. (2012). Music interventions and physical activity in older adults: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(9), 710–719. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1025
18.
CommodariE.GuarneraM. (2008). Attention and aging. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 20(6), 578–584.
19.
DramsdahlM.WesterhausenR.HaavikJ.HugdahlK.PlessenK. J. (2011). Cognitive control in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 188(3), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHRES.2011.04.014
20.
DuY.ZatorreR. J. (2017). Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(51), 13579–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712223114
21.
DubinskyE.WoodE. A.NespoliG.RussoF. A. (2019). Short-term choir singing supports speech-in-noise perception and neural pitch strength in older adults with age-related hearing loss. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, Article 1153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01153
22.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
23.
FelipeL. (2019). Central auditory processing deficits in the elderly. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 3(2), 153–154. https://doi.org/10.34297/ajbsr.2019.03.000654
24.
FengY.PengG.WangW. S. Y. (2022). Categorical perception of lexical tones in Mandarin-speaking seniors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(8), 2789–2800. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00584
25.
FogertyD.Kewley-PortD.HumesL. E. (2012). Temporal offset judgments for concurrent vowels by young, middle-aged, and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), EL499–EL505. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4722172
26.
FostickL. (2019). Card playing enhances speech perception among aging adults: Comparison with aging musicians. European Journal of Ageing, 16(4), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00512-2
27.
FostickL.Ben-ArtziE.BabkoffH. (2013). Aging and speech perception: Beyond hearing threshold and cognitive ability. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 24(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0048
28.
FreyA.FrançoisC.ChobertJ.VelayJ. L.HabibM.BessonM. (2019). Music training positively influences the preattentive perception of voice onset time in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Brain Sciences, 9(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9040091
29.
FujiokaT.TrainorL. J.RossB.KakigiR.PantevC. (2004). Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502706
30.
GoodingL. F.AbnerE. L.JichaG. A.KryscioR. J.SchmittF. A. (2014). Musical training and late-life cognition. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 29(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317513517048
31.
Gordon-SalantS.Yeni-KomshianG. H.FitzgibbonsP. J.BarrettJ. (2006). Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2455–2466. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2171527
32.
GrassiM.MeneghettiC.ToffaliniE.BorellaE. (2017). Auditory and cognitive performance in elderly musicians and nonmusicians. PLOS ONE, 12(11), Article e0187881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187881
HarkriderA. W.PlylerP. N.HedrickM. S. (2005). Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(9), 2153–2164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.016
37.
HarrisI.NivenE. C.GriffinA.ScottS. K. (2023). Is song processing distinct and special in the auditory cortex?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 24(11), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00743-4
38.
HarrisK. C.DubnoJ. R. (2017). Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: Unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing. Neurobiology of Aging, 53, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.008
39.
HennessyS. L.SachsM. E.IlariB.HabibiA. (2019). Effects of music training on inhibitory control and associated neural networks in school-aged children: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, Article 1080. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNINS.2019.01080/BIBTEX
HugdahlK.CarlssonG.EicheleT. (2001). Age effects in dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: Interactions with attention. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(1), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2001_8
HugdahlK.WesterhausenR.AlhoK.MedvedevS.LaineM.HÄmÄläinenH. (2009). Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story: Cognition and Neurosciences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00676.x
44.
IBM Corporation. (n.d.). Released 2020. IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 27.0).
45.
JainC.ParmeshwaraK. S.ChinnarajG. (2020). Effect of age on binaural integration using dichotic digit test in Kannada. Hearing, Balance and Communication, 18(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2019.1705058
46.
JamesC. E.AltenmüllerE.KliegelM.KrügerT. H. C.Van De VilleD.WorschechF.AbdiliL.ScholzD. S.JünemannK.HeringA.GrouillerF.SinkeC.MarieD. (2020). Train the brain with music (TBM): Brain plasticity and cognitive benefits induced by musical training in elderly people in Germany and Switzerland, a study protocol for an RCT comparing musical instrumental practice to sensitization to music. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), Article 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01761-y
47.
JänckeL.SpechtK.ShahJ. N.HugdahlK. (2003). Focused attention in a simple dichotic listening task: An fMRI experiment. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00281-1
48.
JergerJ.MartinJ. (2006). Dichotic listening tests in the assessment of auditory processing disorders. Audiological Medicine, 4, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/16513860600567823
49.
KaganovichN.KimJ.HerringC.SchumakerJ.MacphersonM.Weber-FoxC. (2013). Musicians show general enhancement of complex sound encoding and better inhibition of irrelevant auditory change in music: An ERP study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37(8), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12110
50.
KamA. C. S.KeithR. W. (2010). Aging effect on dichotic listening of Cantonese. International Journal of Audiology, 49(9), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992021003793942
51.
KaragiorgisA. T.ChalasN.KaragianniM.PapadelisG.VivasA. B.BamidisP.ParaskevopoulosE. (2021). Computerized music-reading intervention improves resistance to unisensory distraction within a multisensory task, in young and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 742607. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2021.742607
52.
KumarP.SanjuH. K.NikhilJ. (2016). Temporal resolution and active auditory discrimination skill in vocal musicians. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 20(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570312
53.
LaffereA.DickF.TierneyA. (2020). Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: Individual differences and short-term training. NeuroImage, 213, Article 116717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116717
54.
LiH.JiaJ.YangZ. (2016). Mini-Mental State Examination in elderly Chinese: A population-based normative study. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 53(2), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160119
55.
LiangB.DuY. (2018). The functional neuroanatomy of lexical tone perception: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12(495), Article 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00495
LittlejohnJ.BlackburnD. J.VenneriA. (2023). Testing central auditory processing abilities in older adults with and without dementia using the consonant-vowel dichotic listening task. Frontiers in Dementia, 2, Article 1207546. https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1207546
58.
LiuC.XuC.WangY.XuL.ZhangH.YangX. (2021). Aging effect on Mandarin Chinese vowel and tone identification in six-talker babble. American Journal of Audiology, 30(3), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00139
59.
LiuD.HuJ.WangS.FuX.WangY.PughE.Henderson SabesJ.WangS. (2022). Aging affects subcortical pitch information encoding differently in humans with different language backgrounds. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 14, Article 816100. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNAGI.2022.816100
60.
LuoH.NiJ. T.LiZ. H.LiX. O.ZhangD. R.ZengF. G.ChenL. (2006). Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(51), 19558–19563. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0607065104
61.
MahoneyJ. R.VergheseJ.GoldinY.LiptonR.HoltzerR. (2010). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention in older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710000767
62.
MatsuiT.TanakaS.KazaiK.TsuzakiM.KatayoseH. (2013). Activation of the left superior temporal gyrus of musicians by music-derived sounds. NeuroReport, 24(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c1e02
63.
McAvinueL. P.HabekostT.JohnsonK. A.KyllingsbækS.VangkildeS.BundesenC.RobertsonI. H. (2012). Sustained attention, attentional selectivity, and attentional capacity across the lifespan. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74(8), 1570–1582. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0352-6
MertenN.FischerM. E.DillardL. K.KleinB. E. K.TweedT. S.CruickshanksK. J. (2021). Benefit of musical training for speech perception and cognition later in life. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(7), 2885–2896. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00588
66.
NanY.LiuL.GeiserE.ShuH.GongC. C.DongQ.GabrieliJ. D. E. E.DesimoneR.PatelA. D.SquireL. R.TierneyA.ZatorreR. J. (2018). Piano training enhances the neural processing of pitch and improves speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(28), E6630–E6639. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808412115
67.
Norman-HaignereS. V.FeatherJ.BoebingerD.BrunnerP.RitaccioA.McDermottJ. H.SchalkG.KanwisherN. (2022). A neural population selective for song in human auditory cortex. Current Biology, 32(7), 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2022.01.069
68.
OhdeR. N.Abou-KhalilR. (2001). Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(4), 2156–2166. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1399047
OnoK.NakamuraA.YoshiyamaK.KinkoriT.BundoM.KatoT.ItoK. (2011). The effect of musical experience on hemispheric lateralization in musical feature processing. Neuroscience Letters, 496(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.002
71.
OosterhuisE. J.SladeK.MayP. J. C.NuttallH. E. (2023). Toward an understanding of healthy cognitive aging: The importance of lifestyle in Cognitive Reserve and the Scaffolding Theory of aging and cognition. Journals of Gerontology – Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 78(5), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac197
72.
PatelA. D. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 10773. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2011.00142/BIBTEX
73.
PatelA. D. (2014). Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. Hearing Research, 308, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEARES.2013.08.011
74.
PentikäinenE.KimppaL.MakkonenT.PutkonenM.PitkäniemiA.SalakkaI.PaavilainenP.TervaniemiM.SärkämöT. (2022). Benefits of choir singing on complex auditory encoding in the aging brain: An ERP study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1514(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14789
75.
PentikäinenE.KimppaL.PitkäniemiA.LahtiO.SärkämöT. (2023). Longitudinal effects of choir singing on aging cognition and wellbeing: A two-year follow-up study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, Article 1174574. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2023.1174574
76.
PentikäinenE.PitkäniemiA.SiponkoskiS. T.JanssonM.LouhivuoriJ.JohnsonJ. K.PaajanenT.SärkämöT. (2021). Beneficial effects of choir singing on cognition and well-being of older adults: Evidence from a cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 16(2), Article e0245666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245666
77.
PerronM.VaillancourtJ.TremblayP. (2022). Amateur singing benefits speech perception in aging under certain conditions of practice: Behavioural and neurobiological mechanisms. Brain Structure and Function, 227(3), 943–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02433-2
78.
PettigrewC.SoldanA. (2019). Defining cognitive reserve and implications for cognitive aging. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0917-z
79.
Pichora-FullerM. K.SchneiderB. A.BensonN. J.HamstraS. J.StorzerE. (2006). Effect of age on detection of gaps in speech and nonspeech markers varying in duration and spectral symmetry. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2149837
80.
QiuJ.SunH.ZhongC.MaQ.WangC.ZhouX.MaY. (2019). Reclassified cognitive leisure activity and risk of cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults aged ⩾80 years: A 16-year prospective cohort study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 19(10), 1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/GGI.13774
81.
RauscheckerJ. P. (2018). Where did language come from? Precursor mechanisms in nonhuman primates. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.003
82.
Reuter-LorenzP. A.ParkD. C. (2014). How does it STAC up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychology Review, 24(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11065-014-9270-9
83.
RogersL. J. (2021). Brain lateralization and cognitive capacity. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 11(7), 1996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANI11071996
84.
RoupC. M.WileyT. L.WilsonR. H. (2016). Dichotic word recognition in young and older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17.4.2
85.
SanjuH. K.TayalU. (2018). Auditory temporal resolution in trained Indian classical dancers. Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research, 10(2), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2018.10.00316
86.
SchlaugG. (2015). Musicians and music making as a model for the study of brain plasticity. Progress in Brain Research, 217, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.020
87.
ShaftoM. A.TylerL. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583–587. http://science.sciencemag.org/
88.
SouzaP. E.WrightR. A.BlackburnM. C.TatmanR.GallunF. J. (2015). Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(2), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0138
89.
SternY. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248
90.
SternY.AlbertM.BarnesC. A.CabezaR.Pascual-LeoneA.RappP. R. (2023). A framework for concepts of reserve and resilience in aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 124, 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.10.015
91.
SternY.Arenaza-UrquijoE. M.Bartrés-FazD.BellevilleS.CantilonM.ChetelatG.EwersM.FranzmeierN.KempermannG.KremenW. S.OkonkwoO.ScarmeasN.SoldanA.Udeh-MomohC.ValenzuelaM.VemuriP.VuoksimaaE.UrquiljoE. M. A.CantillonM.. . .Van LoenhoudA. C. (2020). Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 16(9), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219
92.
StraitD. L.KrausN. (2011). Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2011.00113
93.
TakioF.KoivistoM.JokirantaL.RashidF.KallioJ.TuominenT.LaukkaS. J.HämäläinenH. (2009). The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640902805669
94.
TakioF.KoivistoM.LaukkaS. J.HämäläinenH. (2011). Auditory rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2010.549984
95.
TallusJ.SoveriA.HämäläinenH.TuomainenJ.LaineM. (2015). Effects of auditory attention training with the dichotic listening task: Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0139318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139318
96.
TawfikS. M.ShafikN. A. (2022). Effects of aging on dichotic listening ability. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00228-8
97.
ThomsenT.SpechtK.HammarÅ.NyttingnesJ.ErslandL.HugdahlK. (2004). Brain localization of attentional control in different age groups by combining functional and structural MRI. NeuroImage, 22(2), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.015
98.
TremblayK. L.PiskoszM.SouzaP. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(7), 1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00114-7
VengopalK. (2012). Styles of learning and thinking: Hemisphericity functions. In SeelN. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3226–3230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1728
101.
WangX. D.XuH.YuanZ.LuoH.WangM.LiH. W.ChenL. (2021). Brain hemispheres swap dominance for processing semantically meaningful pitch. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 621677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.621677
102.
WangY.YangX.LiuC. (2017). Categorical perception of Mandarin Chinese tones 1–2 and tones 1–4: Effects of aging and signal duration. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(12), 3667–3677. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0061
103.
WangY.YangX.ZhangH.XuL.XuC.LiuC. (2017). Aging effect on categorical perception of mandarin tones 2 and 3 and thresholds of pitch contour discrimination. American Journal of Audiology, 26(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0020
104.
WesterhausenR. (2019). A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality, 24(6), 740–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1598426
105.
WesterhausenR.BlessJ. J.PassowS.KompusK.HugdahlK. (2015). Cognitive control of speech perception across the lifespan: A large-scale cross-sectional dichotic listening study. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/DEV0000014
106.
WesterhausenR.SamuelsenF. (2020). An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing. PLOS ONE, 15(6), Article e0234665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234665
107.
WolffL.QuanY.PerryG.Forde ThompsonW. (2023). Music engagement as a source of cognitive reserve. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/15333175231214833
108.
XuM.ShaoJ.DingH.WangL. (2022). The effect of aging on identification of Mandarin consonants in normal and whisper registers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 4888. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.962242/BIBTEX
109.
YangX.WangY.XuL.ZhangH.XuC.LiuC. (2015). Aging effect on Mandarin Chinese vowel and tone identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), EL411–EL416. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4933234
110.
ZantoT. P.GazzaleyA. (2014). Attention and ageing. In (Kia) NobreA. C.KastnerS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (Vol. 1, pp. 927–971). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199675111.013.020
111.
ZatorreR. J. (2022). Hemispheric asymmetries for music and speech: Spectrotemporal modulations and top-down influences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article 1075511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1075511
112.
ZatorreR. J.BelinP.PenhuneV. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01816-7
113.
ZendelB. R.WestG. L.BellevilleS.PeretzI. (2019). Musical training improves the ability to understand speech-in-noise in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 81, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROBIOLAGING.2019.05.015
114.
ZhangL.FuX.LuoD.XingL.DuY. (2021). Musical experience offsets age-related decline in understanding speech-in-noise: Type of training does not matter, working memory is the key. Ear and Hearing, 42(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000921
115.
ZhaoT. C.KuhlP. K. (2016). Musical intervention enhances infants’ neural processing of temporal structure in music and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(19), 5212–5217. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603984113
