Self-determination and future orientation theories confirm a relationship between motivational context, hopes/fears, and positive/negative outcomes. This study’s aims are threefold: to provide a qualitative inquiry into earlier quantitative findings; to probe whether music professors’ self-perceived motivational styles (autonomy-supportive or controlling) are consistent with their students’ perceptions; and to analyze the relationship between students’ perception of professors’ motivational styles, their hopes/fears (as a cognitive representation of Future Orientation), and engagement concerning their career. Seven dyads from a Peruvian university’s music program participated in the study. Qualitative studies in Peruvian music schools are scarce. An interview was used for data collection, and Atlas.ti 7.5.4. software was employed for analysis. Professors reported their motivational style mostly as autonomy-supportive, but not every student confirmed this self-perception. Some professors are perceived as controlling, and in some instances, the professor’s self-perception corroborates this description. Students’ hopes were generally related to music engagement. A clear relationship between students’ perception of their professor’s autonomy support, their hopes, and music engagement was found. In one dyad, the perception of a controlling motivational style was found to be associated with fears and with a lack of engagement. These findings confirm previous reports from quantitative studies.
AnguianoK. R. (2006). Motivational predictors of continuing motivation and achievement for early adolescent instrumental music students [Doctoral Thesis, University of Iowa]. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/76960359
2.
BlackA.DeciE. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.
3.
Bonneville-RoussyA.HruskaE.TrowerH. (2020). Teaching music to support students: How autonomy-supportive music teachers increase students’ well-being. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419897611
4.
Bonneville-RoussyA.VallerandR. J.BouffardT. (2013). The roles of autonomy support and harmonious and obsessive passions in educational persistence. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.015
5.
BurwellK. (2005). A degree of independence: Teachers’ approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051705006601
6.
BurwellK. (2006). On musicians and singers. An investigation of different approaches taken by vocal and instrumental teachers in higher education. Music Education Research, 8(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800600957479
ChinT.RickardN. (2012). The Music Use (MUSE) Questionnaire: An instrument to measure engagement in music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 4429–4446. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.29.4.429
9.
DvirT.EdenD.AvolioB. J.ShamirB. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069307
10.
EisikovitsZ.KorenC. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interviews analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1642–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376520
11.
ElmoreG. M.HuebnerE. S. (2010). Adolescents’ satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school bonding behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20488
FreerE.EvansP. (2019). Choosing to study music in high school: Teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction, and elective music intentions. Psychology of Music, 47, 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735619864634
14.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic bonding and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
15.
GholsonS. A. (1998). Proximal positioning: A strategy of practice in violin pedagogy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345349
16.
GuptaM.BakkerA. B. (2020). Future time perspective and group performance among students: Role of student engagement and group cohesion. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2019-0128
17.
HaerensL.AeltermanN.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB.Van PetegemS. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08
18.
HamannD. L.BakerD. S.McAllisterP. A.BauerW. I. (2000). Factors affecting university music students’ perceptions of lesson quality and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345569
19.
HerreraD. I.MatosL.GargurevichR.LiraB.ValenzuelaR. (2021). Context matters: Teaching styles and basic psychological needs predicting flourishing and perfectionism in university music students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623312
20.
JohnsonS. R. L.BlumR. W.ChengT. L. (2014). Future orientation: A construct with implications for adolescent health and wellbeing. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 26(4), 333. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0333
21.
KorenC. (2008). The meaning of second couple-hood in old age from a dyadic perspective [Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa]. [in Hebrew]
22.
MadsenK.CassidyJ. W. (2005). The effect of focus of attention and teaching experience on perceptions of teaching effectiveness and student learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300304
23.
MatosL. (2005). School culture, teachers’ and students’ achievement goals as communicating vessels. A study in Peruvian Secondary schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Belgium]. http://hdl.handle.net/1979/149
24.
MatosL.ReeveJ.HerreraD.ClauxM. (2018). Students’ agentic engagement predicts longitudinal increases in perceived autonomy-supportive teaching: The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1448746
MurrayC. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608322940
27.
PérezM. V.CoboR.HernándezH.DíazA.MatosL.Del ValleM. (2017). Cognitive-motivational variables as predictors of adjustment to college life and intention to drop out in first-year students. Congresos CLABES. http://revistas.utp.ac.pa/index.php/clabes/article/view/1663
28.
ReeveJ. (2009a). Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). Wiley.
29.
ReeveJ. (2009b). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy-supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159e175. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
30.
ReeveJ. (2014). Understanding motivation and emotion (7th ed.). Wiley.
31.
ReeveJ.JangH. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
32.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS.BarchJ. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing professors’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
33.
RussellJ.AinleyM.FrydenbergE. (2005). Student motivation and engagement. Department of Education, Science and Training.
34.
RyanR.DeciE. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychology, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
35.
RyanR.DeciE. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.
36.
SeginerR. (2003). Adolescent future orientation: An integrated cultural and ecological perspective. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1), 1056. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1056
37.
SeginerR. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Springer.
38.
SeginerR. (2017). Future orientation and psychological well-Being in adolescence: Two multiple-step models. In KostićA.ChadeeD. (Eds.), Time perspective (pp. 339–363). Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
SeginerR.LensW. (2015). The motivational properties of future time perspective future orientation: Different approaches, different cultures. In StolarskiM.FieulaineN.van BeekW. (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application (pp. 287–304). Springer.
40.
SierensE.VansteenkisteM.GoossensL.SoenensB.DochyF. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy-support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304398
41.
SoS.VoisinD. R.BurnsideA.Gaylord-HardenN. K. (2016). Future orientation and health related factors among African American adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.026
42.
ValenzuelaR.CodinaN.PestanaJ. V. (2017). Self-determination theory applied to flow in conservatoire music practice: The roles of perceived autonomy and competence, and autonomous and controlled motivation. Psychology of Music, 46(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617694502
43.
Van der Kaap-DeederJ.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB.MabbeE. (2017). Children’s daily well-being: The role of mothers,’ professors,’ and siblings’ autonomy support and psychological control. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000218
44.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.SoenensB.LensW. (2004). How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy supportive way. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 232–249. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-420565
45.
WestT.RostvallA. L. (2003). A study of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. International Journal of Teaching Education, 40(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576140304000103
46.
YoungV.BurwellK.PickupD. (2003). Areas of study and teaching strategies instrumental teaching: A case study research project. Music Education Research, 5(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380032000085522
47.
ZhukovK. (2012). Teaching strategies and gender in higher education instrumental studios. International Journal of Music Education, 30(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411431392
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
