Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that tonal violations produce greater skin conductance response (SCR) than timbral violations in music listening. However, it is unknown how people focus their attention during musical excerpts. The aim of this study is to replicate previous research considering two psychophysiological mechanisms: prediction error and brain stem reflex. Twenty-seven nonmusicians were instructed to listen six melodies and detect three altered conditions in one note: a dissonance (note out-of-key), a timbral change, and dissonance which changes in timbre and tone (timdis). Amplitudes of SCR, heart rate (HR), and respiration rate (RSPR) were analyzed. In addition, the frequency of SCR and the percentage of musical events detection were measured. Results showed no significant differences either on amplitude of SCR or on respiratory rate. However, perception of timdis produced an increase in HR higher than dissonance (p < .05) and the timbre condition had a higher frequency of SCR than dissonance (p < .05). In addition, participants only detected 59.3% of dissonances but they were aware of 90% of notes in-key (original melody). Finally, there was no significant correlation between percentage of detection and frequency of SCR. Results are discussed based on the prediction error mechanism, a theoretical model of expectation.

Keywords

musical dissonance timbre expectation prediction error skin conductance response heart rate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abler

Walter

Erk

Kammerer

Spitzer

(2006). Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens. NeuroImage, 31, 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.001

Bradley

M. M.

(2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00702.x

Bradley

M. M.

Codispoti

Cuthbert

B. N.

Lang

P. J.

(2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276

Chuen

Sears

McAdams

(2016). Psychophysiological responses to auditory change. Society for Psychophysiological Research, 53, 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12633

Dellacherie

Roy

Hugueville

Peretz

Samson

(2011). The effect of musical experience on emotional self-reports and psychophysiological responses to dissonance. Psychophysiology, 48(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01075.x

Gorzelanczyk

E. J.

Podlipniak

Walecki

Karpinski

Tarnowska

(2017). Pitch syntax violations are linked to greater skin conductance changes, relative to timbral violations: The predictive role of the reward system in perspective of cortico-subcortical loops. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00586

Greenberg

G. Z.

Larkin

W. D.

(1968). Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44(6), 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911290

Groves

P. M.

Thompson

R. F.

(1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review, 77(5), 419–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029810

Huron

(2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press.

10.

Juslin

P. N.

Harmat

Eerola

(2014). What makes music emotionally significant? Exploring the underlying mechanisms. Psychology of Music, 42(4), 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613484548

11.

Juslin

P. N.

Västfjäll

(2008). Emotional responses to music : The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293

12.

Koelsch

(2018). Investigating the neural encoding of emotion with music. Neuron, 98(6), 1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.029

13.

McAdams

Giordano

B. L.

(2008). The perception of musical timbre. In Hallam

Cross

Thaut

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 72–80). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298457.013.0007

14.

McLachlan

N. M.

(2016). Timbre, pitch, and music. In Oxford handbooks online (Vol. 1, pp. 1–28). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.44

15.

Pearce

M. T.

(2018). Statistical learning and probabilistic prediction in music cognition: Mechanisms of stylistic enculturation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13654

16.

Pearce

M. T.

Wiggins

G. A.

(2012). Auditory expectation: The information dynamics of music perception and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 625–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01214.x

17.

Quiroga-Martinez

D. R. C.

Hansen

Højlund

Pearce

Brattico

Vuust

(2020). Musical prediction error responses similarly reduced by predictive uncertainty in musicians and non-musicians. European Journal of Neuroscience, 51(11), 2250–2269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14667

18.

Wagner

A. R.

(1979). Habituation and memory. In Dickinson

Boakes

R. A.

(Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume for Jerry Konorski (pp. 53–82). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

Role of expectancy in physiological responses to sound recognition of musical dissonance and timbral change

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material