Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Groove is defined as wanting to move the body to music. Most empirical groove research has focused on rhythmic features like microtiming and syncopation, while research on musical liking has focused on pitch, form, and repetition. Here, we examine the effect of timbre on groove and liking ratings by applying audio filters to basslines in an electronic dance music (EDM) style. We also investigate via questionnaire the role of music and dance experience, preferred genre, and gender on groove and liking. Four brief EDM loops were created, each consisting of drum samples and a synthesized bassline. Each loop had four audio filter conditions (high-pass, band-pass, low-pass, no filter) applied to its bassline. The 102 participants heard all stimuli three times, rating them for groove and liking, and then completed the questionnaire. For both groove and liking, participants gave higher ratings to the filter conditions preserving low-frequency energy (low-pass and no filter). The relation of the questionnaire data to groove and liking was limited, meriting further investigation. Overall, the results suggest that people find groovier, and like more, basslines preserving low-frequency energy. The lack of loop-filter interaction suggests that timbre can determine groove and liking across different melodic and rhythmic contexts.

Keywords

dance embodiment experimental aesthetics movement popular music preference timbre

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burger

Ahokas

Keipi

Toiviainen

(2013). Relationships between spectral flux, perceived rhythmic strength, and the propensity to move. In Bresin

(Ed.), Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 179–184). Stockholm, Sweden: Logos Verlag Berlin.

Burger

Thompson

M. R.

Luck

Saarikalio

Toiviainen

(2013). Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–10 (Article 183).

Davies

Madison

Silva

Gouyon

(2013). The effect of microtiming deviations on the perception of groove in short rhythms. Music Perception, 30, 497–510.

Eerola

Ferrer Flores

Alluri

(2012). Timbre and affect dimensions: Evidence from affect and similarity ratings and acoustic correlates of isolated instrument sounds. Music Perception, 30(1), 49–70.

Frühauf

Kopiez

Platz

(2013). Music on the timing grid: The influence of microtiming on the perceived groove quality of a simple drum pattern performance. Musicae Scientiae, 17, 246–260.

Fujioka

Trainor

L. J.

Ross

Kakigi

Pantev

(2005). Automatic encoding of polyphonic melodies in musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1578–1592.

Fujioka

Trainor

L. J.

Ross

(2008). Simultaneous pitches are encoded separately in auditory cortex: An MMNm study. Neuroreport, 19, 361–366.

Hove

M. J.

Marie

Bruce

I. C.

Trainor

L. J.

(2014). Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 10383–10388.

Huron

(2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Janata

Tomic

S. T.

Haberman

(2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 54–75.

11.

Kilchenmann

Senn

(2015). Microtiming in swing and funk affects the body movement behavior of music expert listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–14 (Article 1232).

12.

Lerdahl

Jackendoff

(1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Madison

(2006). Experiencing groove induced by music: Consistency and phenomenology. Music Perception, 24, 201–208.

14.

Madison

Gouyon

Ullén

Hörnström

(2011). Modeling the tendency for music to induce movement in humans: First correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578–1594.

15.

Madison

Sioros

(2014). What musicians do to induce the sensation of groove in simple and complex melodies, and how listeners perceive it. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14 (Article 894).

16.

Marie

Fujioka

Herrington

Trainor

L. J.

(2012). The high-voice superiority effect in polyphonic music is influenced by experience. Psychomusicology, 22, 97–104.

17.

Marie

Trainor

L. J.

(2013). Development of simultaneous pitch encoding: Infants show a high voice superiority effect. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 660–669.

18.

Marie

Trainor

L. J.

(2014). Early development of polyphonic sound encoding and the high voice superiority effect. Neuropsychologia, 57, 50–58.

19.

McAdams

Douglas

Vempala

N. N.

(2017). Perception and modeling of affective qualities of musical instrument sounds across pitch registers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–19 (Article 153).

20.

McCown

Keiser

Mulhearn

Williamson

(1997). The role of personality and gender in preference for exaggerated bass in music. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 543–547.

21.

McDermott

(2011). Auditory preferences as aesthetics: music, voices, and everyday sounds. In Dolan

Sharot

(Eds.), Neuroscience of preference and choice: Cognitive and neural mechanisms (pp. 227–256). London, UK: Elsevier.

22.

Müllensiefen

Gingras

Stewart

Musil

(2014). The Goldsmiths musical sophistication index (Gold-MSI): Technical report and documentation v1.0. London, UK: Goldsmiths, University of London.

23.

Peres

(2016). The sonic landscape as dramatic driver in 21st century pop music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

24.

Phillips-Silver

Trainor

L. J.

(2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science, 308, 1430.

25.

Phillips-Silver

Trainor

L. J.

(2008). Vestibular influence on auditory metrical interpretation. Brain and Cognition, 67, 94–102.

26.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Gosling

S. D.

(2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.

27.

Schellenberg

E. G.

Iverson

McKinnon

M. C.

(1999). Name that tune: Identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 641–646.

28.

Senn

Kilchenmann

von Georgi

Bullerjahn

(2016). The effect of expert performance microtiming on listeners’ experience of groove in swing or funk music. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–16 (Article 1487).

29.

Sioros

Miron

Davies

Gouyon

Madison

(2014). Syncopation creates the sensation of groove in synthesized music examples. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10 (Article 1036).

30.

Solberg

R. T.

Jensenius

A. R.

(2016). Pleasurable and intersubjectively embodied experiences of electronic dance music. Empirical Musicology Review, 11(3–4).

31.

Stevens

Latimer

(1991). Judgements of complexity and pleasingness in music: The effect of structure, repetition, and training. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 17–22.

32.

Stupacher

Hove

M. J.

Janata

(2016). Audio features underlying perceived groove and sensorimotor synchronization in music. Music Perception, 33(5), 571–589.

33.

Stupacher

Hove

M. J.

Novembre

Schütz-Bosbach

Keller

P. E.

(2013). Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: A TMS investigation. Brain and Cognition, 82, 127–136.

34.

Todd

N. P. M.

Rosengren

S. M.

Colebatch

J. G.

(2008). Tuning and sensitivity of the human vestibular system to low-frequency vibration. Neuroscience Letters, 444, 36–41.

35.

Trainor

L. J.

Gao

Lei

Lehtovaara

Harris

L. R.

(2009). The primal role of the vestibular system in determining musical rhythm. Cortex, 45, 35–43.

36.

Van Dyck

Moelants

Demey

Deweppe

Coussement

Leman

. (2013). The impact of the bass drum on human dance movement. Music Perception, 30, 349–359.

37.

Wallmark

Iacoboni

Deblieck

Kendall

R. A.

(2018). Embodied listening and timbre: Perceptual, acoustical, and neural correlates. Music Perception, 35(3), 332–363.

38.

Witek

M. A. G.

(2009). Groove experience: Emotional and physiological responses to groove-based music. In Louhivuori

Eerola

Saarikallio

Himberg

Eerola

P-S

(Eds), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM) (pp. 573–582). Jyväskylä, Finland.

39.

Witek

M. A. G.

(2017). Filling in: Syncopation, pleasure and distributed embodiment in groove. Music Analysis, 36(i), 138–160.

40.

Witek

M. A. G.

Clarke

E F.

Wallentin

Kringelbach

M. L.

Vuust

(2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094446

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

20.40 MB

0.00 MB

All about that bass: Audio filters on basslines determine groove and liking in electronic dance music

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material