Repetition of musical sections, tempo, and physical sound intensity associate strongly with listeners’ affective responses to tonal music in controlled laboratory studies. What contribution might repetition, temporal and acoustic variables make to observers’ responses where music lacks a diatonic tonal structure, an obvious beat, and is performed live? The present study investigates relationships between musical repetition (motivic cells and phrases), note density (sequentially occurring), and intensity with observers’ continuous self-report ratings of engagement with an unfamiliar, atonal post-serialist solo marimba work performed live. Following training, 19 audience members continuously self-reported engagement on a bi-polar, one-dimensional scale using the portable Audience Response Facility. Note density and intensity contributed significantly (or explained variance) to observer engagement with the performance. Contrary to expectation, the repetition variables did not contribute significantly. Controlling serial correlation using a new modelling approach based on Box–Jenkins ARIMA transfer modelling, density emerged as the prime contributor to observer engagement. A single performance appeared to provide observers with insufficient exposure to understand and respond to the structure of atonal music. Note density potentially enabled observers to segment the musical surface and develop some structural understanding, possibly underpinned by stimulus-driven entrainment processes shaping attentional behaviour and musical expectations.
AntoniettiA.CocomazziD.IannelloP. (2009). Looking at the audience improves music appreciation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 89–106. doi:10.1007/s10919–008–0062-x
2.
BailesF.DeanR. T. (2012). Comparative time series analysis of perceptual responses to electroacoustic music. Music Perception, 29, 359–375. doi:10.1525/mp.2012.29.4.359
3.
BalchW. R.LewisB. S. (1996). Music-dependent memory: The roles of tempo changes and mood mediation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1354–1363. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.22.6.1354
4.
BharuchaJ. J.KrumhanslC. L. (1983). The representation of harmonic structure in music: Hierarchies of stability as a function of context. Cognition, 13, 63–102. doi:10.1016/0010–0277(83)90003–3
5.
BigandE. (1993). The influence of implicit harmony, rhythm and musical training on the abstraction of “tension-relaxation schemas” in tonal musical phrases. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 123–137. doi:10.1080/07494469300640391
6.
BigandE.Poulin-CharronnatB. (2006). Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100, 100–130. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007
BoxG. E. P.JenkinsG. M.ReinselG. C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
9.
BroughtonM.StevensC. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: An investigation of the role of movement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37, 137–153. doi:10.1177/0305735608094511
10.
BroughtonM.StevensC.SchubertE. (2008). Continuous self-report of engagement to live solo marimba performance. In MiyazakiK.HiragaY.AdachiM.NakajimaY.TsuzakiM. (Eds.), Tenth international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 366–371). Sapporo, Japan.
11.
BurlandK.PittsS. (2014). Postlude. In BurlandK.PittsS. (Eds.), Coughing and clapping: Investigating audience experience (pp. 175–179). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12.
CambouropoulosE. (2009). How similar is similar?Musicae Scientiae, 13(1 suppl), 7–24. doi:10.1177/102986490901300102
13.
ChenA.DarstP. W.PangraziR. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 383–400. doi:10.1348/000709901158578
14.
ConeE. T. (1987). On derivation: Syntax and rhetoric. Music Analysis, 6, 237–255. doi:10.2307/854204
15.
CreelS. C.NewportE. L.AslinR. N. (2004). Distant melodies: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1119–1130. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.30.5.1119
16.
Dalla BellaS.PeretzI.RousseauL.GosselinN. (2001). A developmental study of the affective value of tempo and mode in music. Cognition, 80, B1–10. doi:10.1016/S0010–0277(00)00136–0
17.
DavidsonJ. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychology of Music, 21, 103–113. doi:10.1177/030573569302100201
18.
DavidsonJ. W. (1994). Which areas of a pianist’s body convey information about expressive invention to an audience?Journal of Human Movement Studies, 26, 279–301.
19.
DeanR. T.BailesF.SchubertE. (2011). Acoustic intensity causes perceived changes in arousal levels in music: An experimental investigation. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18591. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018591
20.
DeliègeI. (1996). Cue abstraction as a component of categorisation processes in music listening. Psychology of Music, 24, 131–156. doi:10.1177/0305735696242007
DeliègeI. (2007). Similarity relations in listening to music: How do they come into play?Musicae Scientiae, 11(1 suppl), 9–37. doi:10.1177/1029864907011001021
23.
DeliègeI.MélenM.StammersD.CrossI. (1996). Musical schemata in real-time listening to a piece of music. Music Perception, 14, 117–159. doi:10.2307/40285715
24.
DibbenN. (1994). The cognitive reality of hierarchic structure in tonal and atonal music. Music Perception, 12, 1–25. doi:10.2307/40285753
25.
EgermannH.PearceM. T.WigginsG. A.McAdamsS. (2013). Probabilistic models of expectation violation predict psychophysiological emotional responses to live concert music. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 533–553. doi:10.3758/s13415–013–0161-y
26.
FletcherN. H.RossingT. D. (1998). The physics of musical instruments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
27.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.95.1.148
28.
GagnonL.PeretzI. (2003). Mode and tempo relative contributions to “happy-sad” judgments in equitone melodies. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 25–40. doi:10.1080/02699930302279
29.
HanninenD. A. (2003). A theory of recontextualization in music: Analyzing phenomenal transformations of repetition. Music Theory Spectrum, 25, 59–97. doi:10.1525/mts.2003.25.1.59
30.
HuangJ.KrumhanslC. L. (2011). What does seeing the performer add? It depends on musical style, amount of stage behavior, and audience expertise. Musicae Scientiae, 15, 343–364. doi:10.1177/1029864911414172
31.
HusainG.ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G. (2002). Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Perception, 20, 151–171. doi:10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.151
32.
IchiyanagiT. (1991). The source for solo marimba [music composition]. Tokyo, Japan: Schott.
33.
JuchniewiczJ. (2008). The influence of physical movement on the perception of musical performance. Psychology of Music, 36, 417–427. doi:10.1177/0305735607086046
34.
KivyP. (1993). The fine art of repetition: Essays in the philosophy of music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KrumhanslC. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart’s Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, tension, and musical ideas. Music Perception, 13, 401–432. doi:10.2307/40286177
36.
KrumhanslC. L.KesslerE. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334–368. doi:10.1037/0033–295x.89.4.334
37.
LargeE. W.JonesM. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119–159. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.106.1.119
38.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
LjungG. M.BoxG. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65, 297–303. doi:10.1093/biomet/65.2.297
41.
LouiP.WesselD. L.Hudson KamC. L. (2010). Humans rapidly learn grammatical structure in a new musical scale. Music Perception, 27, 377–388. doi:10.1525/mp.2010.27.5.377
42.
LucasB. J.SchubertE.HalpernA. R. (2010). Perception of emotion in sounded and imagined music. Music Perception, 27, 399–412. doi:10.1525/mp.2010.27.5.399
43.
MargulisE. H. (2012). Musical repetition detection across multiple exposures. Music Perception, 29, 377–385. doi:10.1525/mp.2012.29.4.377
44.
MargulisE. H. (2013). Aesthetic responses to repetition in unfamiliar music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31, 45–57. doi:10.2190/EM.31.1.c
45.
MargulisE. H. (2014). On repeat: How music plays the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
McAdamsS.VinesB. W.VieillardS.SmithB. K.ReynoldsR. (2004). Influences of large-scale form on continuous ratings in response to a contemporary piece in a live concert setting. Music Perception, 22, 297–350. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.22.2.297
47.
NozaradanS. (2014). Exploring how musical rhythm entrains brain activity with electroencephalogram frequency-tagging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130393. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0393
48.
NusseckM.WanderleyM. M. (2009). Music and motion: How music-related ancillary body movements contribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26, 335–353. doi:10.1525/mp.2009.26.4.335
49.
OckelfordA. (2005). Repetition in music: Theoretical and metatheoretical perspectives. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
50.
OckelfordA. (2009). Similarity relations between groups of notes: Music-theoretical and music-psychological perspectives. Musicae Scientiae, 13, 47–98. doi:10.1177/102986490901300104
51.
OckelfordA.SergeantD. (2013). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “antistructure”. Psychology of Music, 41, 139–174. doi:10.1177/0305735612442582
52.
OlsenK. N.DeanR. T.StevensC. J. (2014). A continuous measure of musical engagement contributes to prediction of perceived arousal and valence. Psychomusicology, 24, 147–156. doi:10.1037/pmu0000044
53.
Poulin-CharronnatB.BigandE.LalitteP.MadurellF.VieillardS.McAdamsS. (2004). Effects of a change in instrumentation on the recognition of musical materials. Music Perception, 22, 239–263. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.22.2.239
54.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS.BarchJ. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
55.
ReynoldsR. (2004). Compositional strategies in The Angel of Death for piano, chamber orchestra and computer-processed sound. Music Perception, 22, 173–205. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.22.2.173
56.
RohrmeierM.RebuschatP.CrossI. (2011). Incidental and online learning of melodic structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 214–222. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.004
SchubertE. (2002). Correlation analysis of continuous emotional response to music: Correcting for the effects of serial correlation. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 213–236. doi:10.1177/10298649020050s108
59.
SchubertE. (2004). Modelling perceived emotion with continuous musical features. Music Perception, 21, 561–585. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.21.4.561
60.
SchubertE.VincsK.StevensC. J. (2013). Identifying regions of good agreement among responders in engagement with a piece of live dance. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31, 1–20. doi:10.2190/EM.31.1.a
61.
SPSS. (2006). SPSS 15.0 Algorithms. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
62.
StevensC. J.SchubertE.Haszard MorrisR. H.FrearM.ChenJ.HealeyS.… HansenS. (2009). Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 800–813. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.06.001
63.
StevensC. J.TardieuJ.Dunbar-HallP.BestC. T.TillmannB. (2013). Expectations in culturally unfamiliar music: Influences of proximal and distal cues and timbral characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00789
64.
StevensC.VincsK.SchubertE. (2009). Measuring audience response on-line: An evaluation of the portable Audience Response Facility (pARF). In StevensC.SchubertE.KruithofB.BuckleyK.FazioS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Music Communication Science (ICoMCS2), published by HCSNet, Western Sydney University.
65.
ThompsonS. (2007). Determinants of listeners’ enjoyment of a performance. Psychology of Music, 35, 20–36. doi:10.1177/0305735607068886
66.
ThorpeM.OckelfordA.AksentijevicA. (2012). An empirical exploration of the zygonic model of expectation in music. Psychology of Music, 40, 429–470. doi:10.1177/0305735610392103
67.
TierneyA.KrausN. (2015). Neural entrainment to the rhythmic structure of music. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 400–408. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00704
68.
VellemanP. F.HoaglinD. C. (1981). Applications, basics, and computing of exploratory data analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.
69.
WebsterG. D.WeirC. G. (2005). Emotional responses to music: Interactive effects of mode, texture, and tempo. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 19–39. doi:10.1007/s11031–005–4414–0
70.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848
71.
ZajoncR. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228. doi:10.1111/1467–8721.00154
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
