Children’s invented musical notations provide a fascinating window into their musical and metacognitive understandings. Using a Vygotskian social constructivist perspective that emphasizes the social nature of cognition, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the processes and products of children’s notations as they notated a song and then taught it to a peer, a multi-level task currently unstudied in the literature. Thirteen Canadian children, aged 5–9 years, without prior music instruction, notated a song learned the previous week, sung it back, explained what they did, and then taught the song to a classmate the following week. The children’s notations, as well as audio and videotapes of them carrying out the multi-level task, provided the primary data; audiotaped conversations with parents, teachers, and a school principal provided secondary data. Analyses generated descriptive and narrative portraits, which demonstrate the increasingly sophisticated representational strategies used by the children from three different age groups as they notated, refined, and taught a song. Select portraits are presented and discussed. Implications for research and practice highlight the value of the research task in eliciting children’s multiple intelligences and collaborative problem-solving skills, and painting more complete portraits of their intuitive and emergent musical and metacognitive understandings.
BambergerJ. (1975). The art of listening: Developing musical perception. New York: Harper & Row.
2.
BambergerJ. (1978). Intuitive and formal musical knowing: Parables of cognitive dissonance. In MadejaS. (Ed.), The arts, cognition and basic skills (pp. 173–209). St.Louis, MO: CEMREL.
3.
BambergerJ. (1982). Revisiting children’s drawings of simple rhythms: A function of reflection-in-action. In StraussS.SavyR. (Eds.), U-shaped behavioural growth (pp. 191–226). New York: Academic Press.
4.
BambergerJ. (1991). The mind behind the musical ear: How children develop musical intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BambergerJ. (1998). Coming to hear in a new way. In AielloR.SlobodaJ. (Eds.), Musical perceptions (pp. 131–151). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BambergerJ. (2007). Restructuring conceptual intuitions through invented notations: From path-making to map-making. In TeubalE.DockrellJ.TolchinskyL. (Eds.), Notational knowledge: Developmental and historical perspectives (pp. 81–112). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
7.
BambergerJ. (2011). The collaborative invention of meaning: A short history of evolving ideas. Psychology of Music, 39(1), 82–101.
8.
BambergerJ. (2013). Discovering the musical mind: A view of creativity as learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
BambergerJ.diSessaA. (2004). Music as embodied mathematics: A study of a mutually informing affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(2), 123–160.
10.
BarrettM. (1997). Invented notations: A view of young children’s musical thinking. Research Studies in Music Education, 8(1), 2–14.
11.
BarrettM. (1999). Modal dissonance: An analysis of children’s invented notations of known songs, original songs and instrumental compositions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 4–22.
12.
BarrettM. (2000). Windows, mirrors, and reflections: A case study of adult constructions of children’s musical thinking. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 142, 43–75.
13.
BarrettM. (2001). Constructing a view of children’s meaning-making as notators: A case study of a five-year-old’s descriptions and explanations of invented notations. Research Studies in Music Education, 16(1), 33–45.
14.
BarrettM. (2002). Invented notations and meditated memory: A case study of two children’s use of invented notations. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153, 55–62.
15.
BarrettM. (2004). Thinking about the representation of music: A case study of invented notation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 161/162, 19–28.
16.
BarrettM. (2005a). Musical communication and children’s communities of musical practice. In MiellD.MacDonaldR.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 261–280). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
BarrettM. (2005b). Representation, cognition, and communication: Invented notation in children’s musical communication. In MiellD.MacDonaldR.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.). Musical communication (pp. 117–142). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
BrizuelaB. M. (2004). Mathematical development in young children: Exploring notations. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
BrunerJ. (1979). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20.
CarmenY.ElkoshiR. (2010). The effect of learning notation by means of an innovative system on children’s musical strength perception and symbolic behavior. Min-Ad: Israel Studies in Musicology Online, 8(1), 75–93.
21.
CarrollD. (1995). A study of the invented musical notations of children: What they tell us about innate musical knowledge. In Abstracts of Papers, Annual Meeting of the Canadian University Music Society.
22.
CarrollD. (2007a). Children’s use of personal, social and material resources to solve a music notational task: A social constructivist perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
23.
CarrollD. (2007b). Portraiture and the role of researcher: Questions and reflections. Canadian Journal of Music Therapy, 32(2), 151–162.
24.
DavidsonL.ColleyB. (1987). Children’s rhythmic development from age 5 to 7: Performance, notation and reading of rhythmic patterns. In PeeryJ. C.PeeryI. W.DrapeT. W. (Eds.), Music and child development (pp. 107–136). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
DavidsonL.ScrippL. (1988). Young children’s musical representations: Windows on music cognition. In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation and composition (pp. 195–230). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
DavidsonL.ScrippL.WelshP. (1988). ‘Happy birthday’: Evidence of conflicts of perceptual knowledge and conceptual understanding. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22(1), 65–74.
27.
DemorestS. M. (2011). Biological and environmental factors in music cognition and learning. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning (pp. 173–215). Volume 1: Strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch.
29.
DiSessaA. (2002). Student’s criteria for representational adequacy. In GravemeijerK.LehrerR.van OersB.VerschaffelL. (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–129). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.
30.
DiSessaA.SherinB. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 385–398.
31.
DomerJ.GromkoJ. E. (1996). Qualitative changes in preschoolers’ invented notations following music instruction. Contributions to Music Education, 23, 62–78.
32.
ElkoshiR. (2002). An investigation into children’s responses through drawing, to short musical fragments and complete compositions. Music Education Research, 4(2), 199–211.
33.
ElkoshiR. (2004a). Interpreting children’s invented graphic notations. Arts and Learning Research Journal, 20(1), 61–84.
34.
ElkoshiR. (2004b). Is music “colourful’? A study of the effects of age and musical literacy on children’s notational colour expressions. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v5n2/v5n2.pdf
35.
ElkoshiR. (2014). Children’s invented notations and verbal responses to a piano work by Claude Debussy. Music Education Research, 17(2), 1–22.
36.
FungC. V.GromkoJ. E. (2001). Effects of active versus passive listening on the quality of children’s invented notations and preferences for two pieces from an unfamiliar culture. Psychology of Music, 29(2), 128–138.
37.
GardnerH. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. New York: Basic.
38.
GardnerH. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic.
39.
GolombC. (1974). Young children’s sculpture and drawing; A study in representational development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
GolombC. (2002). Child art in context: A cultural and comparative perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
GolombC. (2004). The child’s creation of a pictorial world (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
GromkoJ. E. (1994). Children’s invented notations as measures of musical understanding. Psychology of Music, 22(2), 136–147.
43.
GromkoJ. E. (1996). A theory of symbolic development in music. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference.
44.
GromkoJ. E.PoormanA. S. (1998). Developmental trends and relationships in children’s aural perception and symbol use. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 16–23.
45.
HairH. (1993/1994). Children’s descriptions and representations of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 119, 41–48.
46.
KennyC. (1989). The field of play: A guide for the theory and practice of music therapy. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
47.
KerchnerJ. (2000). Children’s verbal, visual and kinesthetic responses: Insight into their music listening experience. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 146, 31–50.
48.
KleinA. M. (1999). Children’s problem-solving language: A study of grade 5 students solving mathematical problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
49.
LauW. C. M.GrieshaberS. (2010). Musical free play: A case for invented musical notation in a Hong Kong kindergarten. British Journal of Music Education, 27(2), 127–140.
50.
Lawrence-LightfootS.Hoffman-DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51.
LeeP-N. (2013). Self-invented notation systems created by young children. Music Education Research, 15 (4), 392–405.
52.
McCuskerJ. (2001). Children’s musical literacy: Product or process. The Orff Echo, 34, 3–4.
53.
MaguireM.GravesB. (2001). Speaking personalities in primary school children’s L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 561–593.
54.
PramlingN. (2009). External representation and the architecture of music: Children inventing and speaking about notations. British Journal of Music Education, 26(3), 273–291.
ReybrouckM.VerschaffelL.LauwerierS. (2009). Children’s graphical notations as representational tools for musical sense-making in a music-listening task. British Journal of Music Education, 26(2), 189–211.
57.
SchonD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the profession. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
58.
TanS. L.KellyM. E. (2004). Graphic representations of short musical compositions. Psychology of Music, 32(2), 191–212.
59.
TrehubS. (2006). Infants as musical connoisseurs. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 33–50). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
UpitisR. (1987). Children’s understanding of rhythm: The relationship between development and musical training. Psychomusicology, 7(1), 41–60.
61.
UpitisR. (1990). Children’s invented notations of familiar and unfamiliar melodies. Psychomusicology, 9(1), 89–106.
62.
UpitisR. (1992). Can I play you my song? The compositions and invented notations of children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational.
63.
UpitisR. (1993). Children’s invented symbol systems: Exploring parallels between music and mathematics. Psychomusicology, 12(1), 52–57.
64.
VerschaffelL.ReybrouckM.JansC.Van DoorenW. (2010). Children’s criteria for representational adequacy in the perception of simple sonic stimuli. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 475–502.
65.
VerschaffelL.ReybrouckM.JanssensM.Van DoorenW. (2009). Using graphical notations to assess children’s experiencing of simple and complex musical fragments. Psychology of Music, 38(3), 259–284.
66.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
67.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
WalkerR. (1978). Perception and music notation. Psychology of Music, 6(1), 21–46.
69.
ZackV. (1994). Vygotskian applications in the elementary mathematics classroom: Looking to one’s peers for helpful explanations. Columbus, OH: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
70.
ZackV.GravesB. (2001). Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “Once you think of it, the Z minus three seems pretty weird.”Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 229–271.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
