The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of repeated exposure to select musical examples on participants’ preference ratings, and to investigate the potential transfer of preference to similar, but unfamiliar musical examples. A pre-test–post-test nonequivalent control group design was used to assess preference ratings before and after a program of repeated exposure. A second post-test was included to assess preference ratings for similar, but unfamiliar examples, in order to examine the possibility of generalized preference transfer. Participants included undergraduate students enrolled in three sections of a music appreciation course at a large university (n = 174). Data were collected using research designed survey instruments administered during test measures. The treatment group (n = 96) was exposed to the first set of examples across a 5-week period within which there were 8 test measures. Pre-test to post-test measures resulted in a general positive trend. Post-test ratings were significantly higher than pre-test, and no point of diminishing return was noted. Ratings on the second post-test were significantly higher than pre-test, suggesting a possible transfer of preference within stylistic genre.
AbelesH. F.ChungJ. W. (1996). Responses to music. In HodgesD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of music psychology (2nd ed; pp. 285–342). San Antonio: University of Texas.
2.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3.
BoyleJ. D.HostermanG.RamseyD. (1981). Factors influencing pop music preferences of young people. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 47–55.
4.
BradleyI. (1971). Repetition as a factor in the development of musical preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 295–298.
5.
BradleyI. (1972). Effect on student musical preferences of a listening program in contemporary art music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 295–298.
6.
BrittinR. V.(1996). Listeners’ preference for music of other cultures: Comparing response modes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 328–340.
7.
BullockW. J. (1973). A review of measures of musico-aesthetic attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 331–344.
8.
ChristmanS. (2013). Handedness and “open-earedness”: Strong right-handers are less likely to prefer less popular musical genres. Psychology of Music, 41, 89–96.
9.
DaviesJ. B. (1978). The psychology of music. London: Hutchinson.
10.
DroeK. (2006). Music preference and music education: A review of literature. Applications of Research in Music Education, 24(2), 23–33.
11.
DunnP.RuyterB.BouwhuisD. (2012). Toward a better understanding of the relation between music preference, listening behavior, and personality. Psychology of Music, 40, 411–428.
12.
FinnasL. (1989). How can musical preferences be modified? A research review. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 102, 1–58.
13.
ForneyK.MachlisJ. (2007). The enjoyment of music: An introduction to perceptive listening (10th ed.). New York: Norton.
14.
FungC. V. (1996). Undergraduate nonmusic majors’ world music preference and multicultural attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 45–57.
15.
GardikiotisA.BaltzisA. (2012). “Rock music for myself and justice to the world!” Musical identity, values, and music preferences. Psychology of Music, 40, 143–163.
16.
GatesT.MadsenK.JellisonJ.YarboroughC. (2000). Vision 2020: The Housewright symposium on the future of music education. Retrieved from http://www.menc.org
17.
HalpernJ. (1992). Effects of historical and analytical teaching approaches on music appreciation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 39–46.
18.
HargreavesD. J. (1984). The effects of repetition on liking for music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 35–47.
19.
HargreavesD. J.MesserschmidtP.RubertC. (1980). Musical preference and evaluation. Psychology of Music, 8, 13–18.
20.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C.TarrantM. (2006). Musical preference and taste in childhood and adolescence. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician: Handbook of musical development (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
HeydukR. G. (1975). Rated preference of musical composition as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84–91.
KamienR. (2005). Music: An appreciation (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
KamienR. (2008). Music: An appreciation (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
LamontA.WebbR. (2010). Short- and long-term musical preferences: What makes a favorite piece of music?Psychology of Music, 38, 222–241.
27.
LarsonP. (1971). The effect of musical and extramusical information upon musical preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 350–354.
28.
LeblancA. (1980). Outline of a proposed model of sources of variation in musical taste. The Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 61, 29–34.
29.
LeblancA. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children’s music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 143–156.
30.
LeblancA.ColmanJ.McCraryJ.SherrillC.MalinS. (1988). Tempo preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 156–168.
31.
LeblancA.CoteR. (1983). Effects of tempo and performing medium on children’s music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 57–66.
32.
LeblancA.McCraryJ. (1983). Effect of tempo on children’s music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 283–294.
33.
LonsdaleA.NorthA. (2012). Musical taste and the representative heuristic. Psychology of Music, 40(2), 131–142.
34.
LundinR. (1967). An objective psychology of music. New York: Ronald Press.
35.
MoskovitzE. (1992). The effect of repetition on tempo preferences of elementary children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 35–46.
36.
MulderJ.Ter BogtT.RaaijmakersA. W.Nic GabhainnS.SikkemaP. (2010). From death metal to R&B? Consistency of music preferences among Dutch adolescents and young adults. Psychology of Music, 38, 67–83.
37.
NieminemS.IstokE.BratticoE.TervaniemiT. (2012). The development of the aesthetic experience of music: Preference, emotions, and beauty. Musicae Scientae, 16, 372–391.
38.
OckelfordA.SergeantD. (2013). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “antistructure.”Psychology of Music, 41, 139–174.
39.
OttatiV. C.SteenbergenM. R.RiggleE. (1992). The cognitive and affective components of political attitudes: measuring the determinants of candidate evaluations. Political Behavior, 14, 423–442.
40.
PeeryJ.PeeryI. (1986). Effects of exposure to classical music on the musical preferences of preschool children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 24–33.
41.
PriceH. E. (1988). The effect of a music appreciation course on students’ verbally expressed preferences for composers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 35–46.
42.
PriceH. E.SwansonP. (1990). Changes in musical attitudes, opinions, and knowledge of music appreciation students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 39–48.
43.
PrinceW. F. (1974). Effects of guided listening on musical enjoyment of junior high school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 45–51.
44.
RadocyR. E. (1982). Preference for classical music: A test for the hedgehog. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 91–95.
45.
RussellP. A. (1997). Musical tastes and society. In HargrevesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 141–145). New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
SenoA. (2007, July30). The sounds of success: Digital downloads over the Internet are helping purveyors of classical music stage an encore. Newsweek International Edition. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19887678/site/newsweek/page/0/
47.
ShehanP. (1985). Transfer of preference from taught to untaught pieces of non-Western music genres. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 149–158.
48.
SzpunarE.SchellenbergG.PlinerP. (2004). Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 370–381.
49.
TeoT. (2003). Relationship of selected musical characteristics and music preference. Visions of Research in Music Eduation, 3. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/
50.
WalkerE. L. (1980). Psychological complexity and preference: A hedgehog theory of behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
51.
WinkielmanP.BerridgeK. (2003). Irrational wanting and subrational liking: How rudimentary motivational and affective processes shape preferences and choices. Political Psychology, 24, 657–680.
52.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.
