Aspects of the ‘zygonic’ model of expectation in music (Ockelford, 2006) were tested experimentally. Forty subjects were played a diatonic melody, starting with the initial note only, then the first two notes, and so on. Each time, subjects were asked to sing what they considered to be the most likely continuation. The results were compared with the outputs of three algorithms derived from the zygonic model, which took into account adjacency (‘Z1’), adjacency and recency (‘Z2’), and adjacency, recency, and between-group projections (‘Z3’). Each algorithm modelled the perceptual responses with statistically distinct degrees of accuracy; Z3 was the most faithful to subjects’ expectations. Given the empirical data, potential refinements to the quantification of the zygonic model were considered. Additionally, it was found that men and women exhibited different patterns of expectation in relation to the stimuli that were presented, paralleling recent neuropsychological data suggesting that the location of music-structural processing in the brain may differ by gender.
BarlowH.MorgensternS. (1948). A dictionary of musical themes. London: Faber & Faber.
2.
BeverT. (1988). A cognitive theory of emotion and aesthetics in music. Psychomusicology, 7, 165–175.
3.
BharuchaJ. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception, 5, 1–30.
4.
BharuchaJ. (1994). Tonality and expectation. In AielloR.with J. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical perceptions (pp. 213–239). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BharuchaJ. (1999). Neural nets, temporal composites, and tonality. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 413–440). New York: Academic Press.
6.
BoulezP. (1971). Boulez on music today (BradshawS.BennettR. R., Eds.). London: Faber & Faber. (Original work published in 1963)
7.
BregmanA. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
CarlsenJ.DivenyiP.TaylorJ. (1970). A preliminary study of perceptual expectancy in melodic configurations. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 22, 4–12.
9.
EngelA.FriesP.SingerW. (2001). Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 704–716.
10.
FodorJ. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
HogarthL.DickinsonA.AustinA.BrownC.DukaT. (2008). Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: The role of uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(11), 1658–1668.
12.
HuronD. (1996). The melodic arch in western folksongs. Computing in Musicology, 10, 3–23.
13.
HuronD. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19(1), 1–64.
14.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
HusserlE. (1964). The phenomenology of internal time-consciousness. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1905–1910)
16.
JackendoffR. (1991). Musical parsing and musical affect. Music Perception, 9(2), 199–230.
17.
JonesM.R. (1981). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion. Part I: Some determinants of expectancies. Psychomusicology, 1, 34–51.
18.
JonesM.R. (1982). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion. Part II: An expectancy model. Psychomusicology, 2, 1–13.
19.
JonesM.R. (1992). Attending to musical events. In JonesM.R.HolleranS. (Eds.), Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 91–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
KoelschS.MaessB.GrossmannT.FriedericiA. (2003). Electric brain responses reveal gender differences in music processing. NeuroReport, 14(5), 709–713.
21.
KrumhanslC. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KveragaK.GhumanA.BarM. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65(2), 145–168.
23.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
MargulisE.H. (2003). Melodic expectation: A discussion and model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
25.
MargulisE.H. (2005). A model of melodic expectation. Music Perception, 22(4), 663–713.
26.
MargulisE.H. (2007). Surprise and listening ahead: Analytic engagements with musical tendencies. Music Theory Spectrum, 29(2), 197–217.
27.
MeyerL. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MeyerL. (1967). Music, the arts, and ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
MeyerL. (2001). Music and emotion: Distinctions and uncertainties. In JuslinP.SlobodaJ. (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 341–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
NarmourE. (1977). Beyond Schenkerism: The need for alternatives in music analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
NarmourE. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
NarmourE. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
NarmourE. (1996). Analyzing form and measuring perceptual content in Mozart’s Sonata K.282: A new theory of parametric analogues. Music Perception, 13(3), 265–318.
34.
OckelfordA. (2005). Repetition in music: Theoretical and metatheoretical perspectives. London: Ashgate.
35.
OckelfordA. (2006). Implication and expectation in music: A zygonic model. Psychology of Music, 34(1), 81–142.
36.
OckelfordA. (2008). Review of Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation, by D. Huron. Psychology of Music, 36(3), 367–382.
37.
OckelfordA. (2009). Similarity relations between groups of notes: Music-theoretical and music-psychological perspectives. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum 4B, 47–93.
38.
OlsonJ.RoeseN.ZannaM. (1996). Expectancies. In HigginsE.KruglanskiA. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.
39.
OrtmannO. (1926). On the melodic relativity of tones. Psychological Monographs, 35(1), Whole No. 162.
40.
OttenM.NieuwlandM.van BerkumJ. (2007). Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences spoken language processing. BMC Neuroscience, 8(89), 1–9.
41.
PanskeppJ. (1995). The emotional sources of “chills” induced by music. Music Perception, 13(2), 171–208.
42.
PovelD.-J. (1996). Exploring the elementary harmonic forces in the tonal system. Psychological Research, 58(4), 274–283.
43.
SchellenbergE. (1996). Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication–realization model. Cognition, 58(1), 75–125.
44.
SchellenbergE. (1997). Simplifying the implication–realization model of melodic expectancy. Music Perception, 14(3), 295–318.
45.
SchmucklerM. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7(2), 109–150.
46.
SergeantD.WelchG. (2009). Gender differences in long-term average spectra of children’s singing voices. Journal of Voice, 23(2), 319–336.
47.
SteinbeisN.KoelschS.SlobodaJ. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1380–1393.
48.
SummerfieldC.EgnerT. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403–409.
49.
TemperleyD. (1995). Motivic perception and modularity. Music Perception, 13(2), 141–169.
50.
ThompsonW.StaintonM. (1996). Expectancy in Bohemian folk song melodies: Evaluation of implicative principles for implicative and closural intervals. Music Perception, 15(3), 231–252.
51.
von HippelP.HuronD. (2000). Why do skips precede reversals? The effect of tessitura on melodic structure. Music Perception, 18(1), 59–85.
52.
WhittleseaB.MassonM.HughesA. (2005). False memory following rapidly presented lists: The element of surprise. Psychological Research, 69(5–6), 420–430.
