In the present study 24 university students read four different texts in four conditions: (1) while listening to music they preferred to listen to while studying; (2) while listening to music they did not prefer to listen to while studying; (3) while listening to a recording of noise from a café; and finally (4) in silence. After each text they took a reading-comprehension test. Eye movement data were recorded for all participants in all conditions.
A main effect for the reading-comprehension scores revealed that the participants scored significantly lower after they had been listening to the non-preferred music while reading, compared with reading in silence. No significant effects were found between the other conditions. No significant differences between conditions were found for the traditional eye movement measures in reading (fixation duration, saccadic amplitude, regressions, and first-pass and second-pass reading time). It is suggested that this result is a consequence of participants not being aware that their reading processes are disrupted by a non-preferred musical background. They do not make the necessary changes to the processes involved in reading required to compensate for increased cognitive load. The results are discussed in relation to study/reading habits, extraversion, arousal and working memory capacity.
BaddeleyA. (1979). Working memory and reading. In KolersP. A.WrolstadM. E.BoumaH. (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 355–370). New York: Plenum.
2.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208.
3.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
BjörnssonC. H. (1968). Läsbarhet [Readability]. Stockholm: Liber.
5.
BlaneyP. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229–246.
6.
BoyleR.ColtheartV. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 398–416.
7.
BrainardD. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
8.
CantrilH.AllportG. W. (1935). The psychology of radio (1st ed.). New York: Harper and Brothers.
9.
CassidyG. G.MacDonaldR. A. R. (2007). The effects of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 517–537.
10.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2007). Personality and music: Can traits explain why people listen to music?British Journal of Psychology, 98, 175–185.
11.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.Gomà-i-FreixanetM.FurnhamA.MuroA. (2009). Personality, self-estimated intelligence and uses of music: A Spanish replication and extension using structural equation modelling. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 149–155.
12.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.SwamiV.FurnhamA.MaakipI. (2009). The Big Five personality traits and uses of music in everyday life: A replication in Malaysia using structural equation modelling. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 20–27.
13.
ClarkC.MartinR.van KempenE.AlfredT.HeadJ.DaviesH.. (2006). Exposure-effect relations between aircraft and road traffic noise exposure at school and reading comprehension: The RANCH project. Am J Epidemiol, 163, 27–37.
14.
DaoussisL.McKelvieS. J. (1986). Musical preferences and effects of music on a reading comprehension test for extraverts and introverts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 283–289.
15.
EichE.ForgasJ. P. (2003). Mood, cognition, and memory. In HealyA. F.ProctorR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Experimental psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 61–83). New York: Wiley.
16.
EtaughC.PtasnikP. (1982). Effects of studying to music and post-study relaxation on reading comprehension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 141–142.
17.
EysenckH. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
18.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29.
19.
FogelsonS. (1973). Music as a distracter on reading-test performance of eighthgrade students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 1265–1266.
20.
FurnhamA.AllassK. (1999). The influence of musical distraction of varying complexity on the cognitive performance of extraverts and introverts. European Journal of Personality, 13, 27–38.
21.
FurnhamA.BradleyA. (1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 445–455.
22.
FurnhamA.StrbacL. (2002). Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45(3), 203–217.
23.
FurnhamA.TrewS.SneadeI. (1999). The distracting effects of vocal and instrumental music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(2), 381–392.
24.
HessE. H.PoltJ. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132(3423), 349–350.
25.
HyggeS. (2003). Classroom experiments on the effects of different noise sources and sound levels on long-term recall and recognition in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 895–914.
26.
HyggeS.EvansG. W.BullingerM. (2002). A prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise on cognitive performance in schoolchildren. Psychological Science, 13(5), 469–474.
27.
HyönäJ. (1995). An eye movement analysis of topic-shift effect during repeated reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1365–1373.
28.
HyönäJ.LorchR. F.Jr.KaakinenJ. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 44–55.
29.
IwanagaM.ItoT. (2002). Disturbance effect of music on processing of verbal and spatial memories. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 1251–1258.
30.
JohanssonR.WengelinÅ.JohanssonV.HolmqvistK. (2010). Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: Relationship with text production processes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(7), 835–851.
31.
JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.) (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and research. London: Oxford University Press.
32.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
KigerD. (1989). Effects of music information load on a reading comprehension task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 531–534.
34.
LevyB. A. (1977). Reading: Speech and meaning processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 623–638.
35.
MartinR. C.WogalterM. S.ForlanoJ. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 382–398.
36.
OlsonR. K.KlieglR.DavidsonB. J. (1983). Dyslexic and normal readers’ eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 816–825.
37.
PartalaT.SurakkaV. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 185–198.
38.
PomplunM.SunkaraS. (2003). Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction. In HarrisD.DuffyV.SmithM.StephanidisC. (Eds.), Human-centred computing: Cognitive, social, and ergonomic aspects. Vol. 3 of the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, HCII 2003, Crete, Greece, 542–546.
39.
RansdellS. E.GilroyL. (2001). The effects of background music on word-processed writing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17(2), 141–148.
40.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
41.
RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1989). The psychology of reading. New York: Prentice-Hall.
42.
ReichleE. D.PollatsekA.FisherD. L.RaynerK. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
43.
SchnitzerB. S.KowlerE. (2006). Eye movements during multiple readings of the same text. Vision Research, 46(10), 1611–1632.
44.
StarrM. S.RaynerK. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 156–163.
45.
TurnerM. L.EngleR. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
46.
WallinB.ErikssonS. (2002). Vilka är de goda läsarna? En jämförelse mellan deltagare med alla rätt respektive genomsnittsresultat på högskoleprovets delprov LÄS [Who are the good readers? A comparison between test takers who reached the maximum score and those who reached the average score in the SweSAT subtest READ] (PM nr 179). Umeå: Enheten för pedagogiska mätningar, Umeå universitet.
