The current study explored whether perceptual organization can influence performance in a rhythm task. To test this possibility we had experienced drummers play two identical rhythmic passages by different groupings. The pulse of the rhythmic passage was manipulated to create a fast task and a slow task. All 27 participants performed the rhythmic passage more accurately when they were under the influence of the slower pulse. In addition, for all 27 participants, the fastest tempo for which they were able to perform the rhythm task to criterion was faster when in the slower pulse condition. These results demonstrate that perceptual organization can affect musical performance.
Desain, P., & Honing, H. ( 2003). The formation of rhythmic categories and metric priming . Perception, 32, 341-365.
2.
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Lin, P., Chang, J., Zemon, V., & Midlarsky, E. ( 2008). Silent illumination: A study on Chan (Zen) meditation, anxiety, and musical performance quality. Psychology of Music , 36, 139-155.
4.
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P., & Johnson, E.K. ( 2000). Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1-19.
5.
Nelson, R., & DeBacker, T.K. (2008). Achievement motivation in adolescents: The role of peer climate and best friends. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 170-189.
6.
Patel, A., Iversen, J., & Rosenberg, J. ( 2006). Comparing the rhythm and melody of speech and music: The case of British English and French. Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3034-3047.
7.
Parncutt, R. ( 1987). The perception of pulse in musical rhythm. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music: Papers given at a symposium in the Third International Conference on Event Perception and Action (pp. 127-138). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
8.
Penel, A., & Drake, C. ( 2000). Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music. Music Perception, 18(1), 1-23.
9.
Penel, A., & Drake, C. ( 2004). Timing variations in music performance: Musical communication, perceptual compensation, and/or motor control?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 66(4), 545-562.
10.
Repp, B. ( 2007). Hearing a melody in different ways: Multistability of metrical interpretation, reflected in rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization . Cognition, 102(3), 434-454.
11.
Sadakata, M., Desain, P., & Honing, H. ( 2006). The Bayesian way to relate rhythm perception and production . Music Perception, 23, 269-288.
12.
Selkirk, E.O. ( 1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
13.
Steptoe, A. ( 1983). The relationship between tension and the quality of musical performance. Journal of the International Society for the Study of Tension in Performance, 1, 12-22.
14.
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. ( 1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 69, 797-811.
15.
Terken, J., & Hermes, D. ( 2000). The perception of prosodic prominence. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment (pp. 89-127). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
