The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of physical movement on listeners' perception of musical performance. Participants ( N = 112) rated a professional pianist performing with a recorded musical excerpt under three physical movement conditions: `no movement', `head and facial movement' and `full body movement'. Relationships between these physical movement conditions and the musical elements of phrasing, dynamics, rubato and overall performance were also investigated. Results indicated the pianist's physical movements significantly increased participants' ratings of the performances. Additionally, as the pianist's physical movements increased, so did the participants' ratings of phrasing, dynamics, rubato and overall musical performance. No significant differences were found between levels of training or for gender.
Chopin, F. (1997[1832]) Etude in E major, Op. 10, No. 3 (recorded by V. Ashkenazy), on Chopin, the Piano Works (CD). London: Decca.
2.
Clarke, E.F. and Davidson, J.W. (1998) `The Body in Performance', in W. Thomas (ed.) Composition-performance-reception , pp. 74-92. Aldershot: Ashgate.
3.
Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.R. and Kozlowski, L.T. (1978) `A Biomechanical Invariant for Gait Perception' , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4: 357-72.
4.
Davidson, J.W. (1993) `Visual Perception of Performance Manner in the Movements of Solo Musicians', Psychology of Music21: 103-13.
5.
Davidson, J.W. (1994) `Which Areas of a Pianist's Body Convey Information about Expressive Intention to an Audience?', Journal of Human Movement Studies6: 279-301.
6.
Davidson, J.W. (2001) `The Role of the Body in the Production and Perception of Solo Vocal Performance: A Case Study of Annie Lennox', Musicae Scientiae5: 235-56.
7.
Davidson, J.W. and Correia, J.S. (2002) `Body Movement', in R. Parncutt and G. McPherson (eds) The Science and Psychology of Music Performance, pp. 237-50. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Davidson, J.W. and Good, J.M.M. (2002) `Social and Musical Co-ordination between Members of a String Quartet: An Exploratory Study', Psychology of Music30: 186-201.
9.
Friberg, A. and Sundberg, J. (1999) `Does Music Performance Allude to Locomotion? A Model of Final Ritardandi Derived from Measurements of Stopping Runners', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America105: 1469-84.
10.
Gabrielsson, A. (1982) `Performance and Training of Musical Rhythm', Psychology of Music, special issue: 42-46.
11.
Gabrielsson, A. (1992) `The Complexities of Rhythm', in T.J. Tighe and W.J. Dowling (eds) Psychology and Music: The Understanding of Melody and Rhythm, pp. 94-120. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Gabrielsson, A. (1999) `Studying Emotional Expression in Music Performance' , Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education141: 47-53.
13.
Gabrielsson, A. and Juslin, P.N. (1996) `Emotional Expression in Music Performance: Between the Performer's Intention and the Listener's Experience', Psychology of Music24: 68-91.
14.
Johansson, G. (1973) `Visual Perception of Biological Motion and a Model for its Analysis', Perception & Psychophysics14: 201-11.
15.
Johnson, C.M. (1996) `Musicians' and Nonmusicians' Assessment of Perceived Rubato in Musical Performance', Journal of Research in Music Education44: 84-96.
16.
Juslin, P.N. and Sloboda, J.A. (eds) (2001) Music and Emotion: Theory and Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Nakamura, T. (1987) `The Communication of Dynamics between Musicians and Listeners through Musical Performance', Perception & Psychophysics41: 525-33.
18.
Palmer, C. (1989) `Mapping Musical Thought to Musical Performance' , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15: 331-46.
19.
Persson, R.S. (2001) `The Subjective World of the Performer', in P.N. Juslin and J.A. Sloboda (eds) Music and Emotion: Theory and Research , pp. 275-89. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Runeson, S. and Frykholm, G. (1983) `Kinematic Specification of Dynamics as an Informational Basis for Person-and-action Perception: Expectation, Gender Recognition, and Deceptive Intention', Journal of Experimental Psychology: General112: 585-615.
21.
Ryan, C. and Costa-Giomi, E. (2004) `Attractiveness Bias in the Evaluation of Young Pianists' Performances', Journal of Research in Music Education52: 141-54.
22.
Saunders, T.C. and Holahan, J.M. (1997) `Criteria-specific Rating Scales in the Evaluation of High School Instrumental Performance', Journal of Research in Music Education45: 259-72.
23.
Sloboda, J.A. (1983) `The Communication of Musical Metre in Piano Performance' , Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology35A: 377-96.
24.
Wapnick, J., Mazza, J.K. and Darrow, A.A. (1998) `Effects of Performer Attractiveness, Stage Behavior, and Dress on Violin Performance Evaluation', Journal of Research in Music Education46: 510-21.
25.
Wapnick, J., Mazza, J.K. and Darrow, A.A. (2000) `Effects of Performer Attractiveness, Stage Behavior, and Dress on Evaluation of Children's Piano Performances', Journal of Research in Music Education48: 323-35.
26.
Wapnick, J., Darrow, A.A., Kovacs, J. and Dalrymple, L. (1997) `Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Evaluation of Vocal Performance', Journal of Research in Music Education45: 470-9.
27.
Winter, N. (1993) `Music Performance Assessment: A Study of the Effects of Training and Experience on the Criteria used by Music Examiners', International Journal of Music Education22: 34-9.
