In this study, two different types of analysis of a piece of post-tonal music (the
fifth movement of the String Quartet Op.1 (1959) by G. Kurtág) are
compared: an analysis performed by seven professional music analysts using the
musical score, and a perceptual analysis carried out by two groups of subjects (18
musicians and 25 non-musicians) while listening in real time. Three possible
macroforms proposed by the analysts were compared with those perceived by the
listeners. The results show that the macroforms hypothesized by the analysts
represented the basic framework for those perceived by the listeners; moreover, the
musical competence possessed by the musicians who took part in the listening
exercise does not, on the whole, appear to have affected the perception of the
macroform of a post-tonal piece of music.
Addessi, A.R.
and
Caterina, R.
(2000)
‘Perceptual Musical Analysis: Segmentation and Perception of Tension’
, Musicæ Scientiæ4(1):
31-54
.
2.
Addessi, A.R.
and
Caterina, R.
(2002)
‘Perception of the “macroform” in the
Quartetto per Archi in due tempi (1955) by Bruno Maderna’
, in
G. Buzzanca
,
G. Di Maio
,
G. Nottoli
and
M. Olivetti Belardinelli
(eds) Second International Conference: ‘Understanding and
Creating Music’. Caserta: Seconda
Università degli Studi di Napoli. (Available on CD.)
3.
Baroni, M.
(2003)
‘The Macroform in Post-tonal Music: Listening and Analysis’
, Musicæ Scientiæ7(2):
219-240
.
4.
Baroni, M.
and
Callegari, L.
(eds) (1984) Musical Grammar and Computer Analysis.
Florence: Olschki
.
5.
(Le regole della musica,
Torino: EDT
, 1999.)
6.
Bigand, E.
,
Lerdhal, F.
and
Pineau, M.
(1994)
‘Deux approches expérimentales des quatre composants
de la Thèorie Générative de la Musique
Tonale’ (Two experimental approaches to the four components of the
generative theory of tonal music)
, in
I. Deliège
(ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Music
Perception and Cognition, pp.
259-260
. Liège, Belgium: European Society for the Cognitive
Sciences of Music.
7.
Butler, D.
(1990)
‘A Study of Event Hierarchies in Tonal and Post-tonal Music’
, Psychology of Music18(1):
4-17
.
8.
Cook, N.
(1990) Music, Imagination and Culture,
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
9.
Cross, I.
(1998)
‘Music Analysis and Music Perception’
, Music Analysis17(2):
3-20
.
10.
D’Ambrosio, W.
,
Gabrieli, M.
and
Pozzi, E.
(1999)
‘Towards an Analysis of Post-tonal Music: Theoretical
Considerations and Applications of Method’
, paper presented at the Fourth European Music Analysis Conference
‘Analysis in Europe Today: the different traditions’, Dutch
Society for Music Theory, Conservatorium, Rotterdam,
22-5 October.
11.
Deliège, I.
(1987)
‘Grouping Conditions in Listening to Music: An Approach to
Lerdhal and Jackendoff’s Grouping Preference Rules’
, Music Perception4(4):
325-360
.
12.
Deliège, I.
(1989)
‘A Perceptual Approach to Contemporary Musical Forms’
, Contemporary Music Review4:
213-230
.
13.
Deliège, I.
(1998)
‘Wagner “Alte Weise”: Une approche
perceptive’ (Wagner ‘Alte Weise’: A perceptual approach)
, Musicæ Scientiæ Special Issue:
63-90
.
14.
Deliège, I.
(2001a)
‘Introduction: Similarity Perception - Categorization - Cue Abstraction’
, Music Perception18(3):
233-243
.
15.
Deliège, I.
(2001b)
‘Prototype Effects in Music Listening: An Empirical Approach to
the Notion of Imprint’
, Music Perception18(3):
371-403
.
16.
Deliège, I.
and
El Ahmadi, A.
(1990)
‘Mechanisms of Cue Extraction in Musical Groupings: A Study of
Perception on Sequenza VI for Viola Solo by L. Berio’
, Psychology of Music18(1):
18-44
17.
Deliège, I.
and
Mélen, M.
(1997) ‘Cue Abstraction in the Representation of
Musical Form’, in
I. Deliège
and
J. Sloboda
(eds) Perception and Cognition of Music, pp.
387-412.
Hove: Psychology Press
.
18.
Dibben, N.
(1999)
‘The Perception of Structural Stability in Atonal Music: The
Influence of Salience, Stability, Horizontal Motion, Pitch Commonality, and Dissonance’
, Music Perception16(3):
265-294
.
19.
Forte, A.
(1973) The Structure of Atonal Music.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
20.
Hasty, C.
(1981)
‘Segmentation and Process in Post-tonal Music’
, Music Theory Spectrum3:
54-73
.
21.
Imberty, M.
(1981) Les écritures du temps:
Sémantique psychologique de la musique (The writings of the time: The
psychological semantic of music), Vol. 2.
Paris: Bordas
.
22.
Imberty, M.
(1987) ‘L’occhio e
l’orecchio: Sequenza III di Berio’ (The eye and the ear:
Sequenza III by Berio), in
L. Marconi
and
G. Stefani
(eds) Il senso in musica, pp. 163-186.
Bologna: CLUEB
.
23.
Imberty, M.
(1993)
‘How Do We Perceive Atonal Music? Suggestions for a Theoretical Approach’
, Contemporary Music Review9:
325-338
.
24.
Johnsons-Laird, P.N.
(1991) ‘Jazz Improvisation: A Theory at the
Computational Level’, in
P. Howell
,
R. West
and
I. Cross
(eds) Representing Musical Structure, pp.
291-325.
London: Academic Press
.
25.
Jones, M.R.
(1990) ‘Musical Events and Models of Musical
Time’, in
R.A. Block
(ed.) Cognitive Models of Psychological Time, pp.
207-240.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
.
26.
Kintsch, W.
and
Van Dijk, A.
(1975)
‘Comment on se rappelle et on résume des
histoires’ (How you remember and summarize stories)
, Langages40:
153-173
.
27.
La Rue, J.
(1970) Guidelines for Style Analysis.
New York: Norton
.
28.
Lerdahl, F.
(1989)
‘Atonal Prolongation Structure’
, Contemporary Music Review4:
65-88
.
29.
Lerdahl, F.
(1997) ‘Composing and Listening: A Reply to
Nattiez’, in
I. Deliège
and
J. Sloboda
(eds) Perception and Cognition of Music, pp.
421-428.
Hove: Psychology Press
.
30.
Lerdahl, F.
and
Jackendoff, R.
(1983) A Generative Theory of Tonal Music.
Cambridge, MA.: MIT. Press
.
31.
Levinson, J.
(1997) Music in the Moment.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
32.
Nattiez, J.-J.
(1997) ‘What is the Pertinence of the
Lerdhal-Jackendoff Theory?’, in
I. Deliège
and
J. Sloboda
(eds) Perception and Cognition of Music, pp.
413-419.
Hove: Psychology Press
.
33.
Ruwet, N.
(1966)
‘Méthodes d’analyse en
musicologie’ (Analytic methods in musicology)
, Revue belge de Musicologie20:
65-90
.
