The Development of Intuitive Musical Understanding: A Natural Experiment

Abstract

Tracing the compositional process of two musically untrained college students, this close case study demonstrates their ability to produce archetypal tonal melodies, even when working initially within the constraints of tonally and metrically ambiguous melodic materials. The two students were representative of a sample of about 75 who participated in a new approach to music fundamentals supported by a novel, interactive computer music environment. Students’ logs, including their composition sketches, decision-making, analysis of progressive modifications and completed compositions, serve as evidence and data for analysis. It is argued that, when students work at their own pace with immediate sound feedback, can modify given materials and have access to multiple representations at differing levels of detail, they are able to make explicit their intuitive criteria for compositional decision-making, as well as proposing an intuitive model of a ‘sensible tune’.

Keywords

archetypes experimental methodology learning music theory musical intuitions perception structural functions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auhagen, W. and Vos, P.G. (2000) ‘Experimental Methods in Tonality Induction Research: A Review’, Music Perception 17: 417-434.

Bamberger, J. (1991/5) The Mind behind the Musical Ear: How Children Develop Musical Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bamberger, J. (1996) ‘Turning Music Theory on Its Ear: Do We Hear What We See: Do We See What We Say?’, International Journal of Computers and Mathematics Learning 1 (1): 48-74.

Bamberger, J. (2000) Developing Musical Intuitions: A Project-Based Introduction to Making and Understanding Music. New York: Oxford University Press.

Clarke, E.F. and Krumhansl, C.L. (1990) ‘Perceiving Musical Time’, Music Perception 7: 213-251.

Deliège, I. , Melen, M. , Stammers, D. and Cross, I. (1996) ‘Musical Schemata in Real-Time Listening’, Music Perception 14: 117-160.

Granados, R. (2001) ‘Constructing Intersubjectivity in Representational Design Activities’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19: 503-530.

Hasty, C.F. (1997) Meter as Rhythm. New York: Oxford University Press.

Krumhansl, C. (1990) Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Krumhansl, C. and Kessler, E. (1982) ‘Tracing the Dynamic Changes in Perceived Tonal Organization in a Spatial Representation of Musical Keys’, Psychological Review 89: 334-368.

11.

Kuhn, T.S. (1977) ‘The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science’, in The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Leman, M. (2000) ‘An Auditory Model of the Role of Short-Term Memory in Probe-Tone Ratings’, Music Perception 17: 481-509.

13.

Meyer, L.B. (1973) Explaining Music. Berkeley: University of California Press.

14.

Minsky, M. (1986) The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

15.

Narmour, E. (2000) ‘Music Expectation by Cognitive Rule-Mapping’, Music Perception 17: 329-398

16.

Rosner, B.S. and Meyer, L.B. (1982) ‘Melodic Processes and the Perception of Music’, in D. Deutch (ed.) The Psychology of Music. New York: Academic Press.

17.

Schoenberg, A. (1975) Style and Idea. New York: St Martins Press.

18.

Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

19.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. Michael Cole , Vera John Steiner , Sylvia Scribner and Ellen Souberman . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.