This case study investigated the transformation of intuitive and reflective thinking during a composer’s compositional process. The qualitative data comprised stimulated recall interviews conducted in the composer’s studio during the compositional process and the entire manuscript corpus that the composer created during that process. The results showed the qualitative change in the composer’s intuitive and reflective thinking in the course of the process; within intuitive compositional acts, imagination changed into experimentation and incubation into restructuring, whereas within reflective compositional acts, rule-based reasoning changed into contemplating alternatives. Further, intuitive metacognition decreased while reflective metacognition increased. These changes were explained by concurrent procedures of grounding and rationalisation. In the grounding procedure, the composer substantiated the fuzzy construction of his original ideas (called the Identity Idea by the composer) into aesthetically coherent musical structures that gradually limited the compositional problem space. The rationalisation procedure involved the composer becoming increasingly proficient in the way in which he operated on his musical ideas and materials. After a critical moment, the composer adopted a situation-specific cognitive device called ‘rational intuition’. This ‘rational intuition’ was the composer’s way of creating aesthetic coherence when working fluently, albeit retaining rationality, in an insecure and complex working situation of a creative process. The prerequisites of ‘rational intuition’ were (1) the guidance of a goal-driven cue (i.e. the Identity Idea) as a key determinant and motivational energy for the process; (2) the selection of intuitive and reflective compositional acts to match compositional situations; (3) an expert ability to learn implicitly; and (4) resilience to abeyance.
AckerF. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292–303.
2.
AllenA.ThomasK. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 109–118.
3.
AltyJ. (2002). Engineering for the mind: Cognitive science and musical composition. Journal of New Music Research, 31, 249–255.
4.
AtkinsonT.ClaxtonG. (2000). The intuitive practitioner. On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5.
BallL.OrmerodT. (2008). Cognitive psychology. In WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 554–575). London, UK: Sage.
6.
BangertD.SchubertE.FabianD. (2014). A spiral model of musical decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 320.
7.
BarghJ.ChartrandT. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
8.
BetschT. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In PlessnerH.BetschC.BetschT. (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
BetschT.HeldC. (2012). Rational decision making: Balancing RUN and JUMP modes of analysis. Mind & Society, 11, 69–80.
10.
BetschT.PlessnerH.SchalliesE. (2004). The value-account model of attitude formation. In MaioG.HaddockG. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 251–273). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
11.
BiggsJ. (1999). What the student does. Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57–75.
12.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BruyaB. (2010). Introduction: Toward a theory of attention that includes effortless attention and action. In BruyaB. (Ed.), Effortless attention. A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
ChassyP.GobetP. (2011). A hypothesis about the biological basis of expert intuition. Review of General Psychology, 15, 198–313.
15.
CollinsD. (2005). A synthesis process model of creative thinking in music composition. Psychology of Music, 33, 193–216.
16.
DaneE.PrattM. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54.
17.
De NeysW. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38.
18.
De NeysW.GoelV. (2011). Heuristics and biases in the brain: dual neural pathways for decision making. In VartanianO.MandelD. (Eds.), Neuroscience of decision making (pp. 125–141). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19.
DeroostN.VandenbosscheJ.ZeischkaP.CoomansD.SoetensE. (2012). Cognitive control: A role for implicit learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1243–1258.
20.
DijksterhuisA.AartsH. (2010) Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 467–490.
21.
DijksterhuisA.MaartenW.NordgrenL.van BaarenR. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.
22.
DijksterhuisA.NordgrenL. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.
23.
DijksterhuisA.StrickM.BosM.NordgrenL. (2014). Prolonged thought: Proposing type 3 processing. In ShermanJ.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 355–368). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
DoninN.FéronF.-X. (2012). Tracking the composer’s cognition in the course of a creative process: Stefano Gervasoni and the beginning of Gramigna. Musicæ Scientiæ, 16, 262–285.
25.
DoninN.TheureauJ. (2007). Theoretical and methodological issues related to long term creative cognition: The case of musical composition. Cognition Technology & Work, 9, 233–251.
26.
DreyfusH.DreyfusS. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
27.
EpsteinS. (2010). Demystifying intuition: What it is, what it does, and how it does it. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 295–312.
28.
EpsteinS. (2011). The influence of valence and intensity of affect on intuitive processing. In SinclairM. (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 37–51). Massachusetts, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
29.
EricssonK. (2003). Valid and non-reactive verbalization of thoughts during performance of tasks. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 1–18.
30.
EvansJ.StanovichK. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
31.
FiskG.HaaseS. (2011). The relationship between the objective identification threshold and priming effects does not provide a definitive boundary between conscious and unconscious perceptual processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1221–1231.
32.
GlöcknerA.WittemanC. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: a categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1–25.
33.
GommR.HammersleyM.FosterP. (2009). Case study and generalization. In GommR.HammersleyM.FosterP. (Eds.), Case study method. Key study and key texts (pp. 98–112). London, UK: Sage.
34.
GoreJ.Sadler-SmithE. (2011). Unpacking intuition: A process and outcome framework. Review of General Psychology, 15, 304–316.
35.
HabibM.CassottiM.MoutieS.HoudéO.BorsG. (2014). Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 253.
36.
HammondK. (2007). Beyond rationality: The search for wisdom in a troubled time. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
HogarthR. (2001). Education intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
HommelB. (2007). Consciousness and control. Not identical twins. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 155–175.
39.
KerenG.SchulY. (2009). Two is always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.
40.
KhatriN.NgH. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.
41.
KleinG. (2003). Intuition at work. New York, NY: Doubleday.
42.
KoriatA.Ma’ayanH.NussinsonR. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36–69.
43.
KruglanskiA.GigerenzerG. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.
44.
LernerJ.KertnerD. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.
45.
LiebermanM.JarchoJ.SatputeA. (2004). Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: an FMRI study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 421–435.
46.
LyleJ. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878.
47.
MarlandP. (1986). Models of teachers’ interactive thinking. The Elementary School Journal, 87, 209–226.
48.
MarlandP.OsbourneB. (1990). Classroom theory, thinking, and action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 93–109.
49.
NisbettR.WilsonT. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
50.
ÖllingerM.GoelV. (2010). Problem solving. In BlatzederB.GoelV.von MülerA. (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework (pp. 3–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
51.
PaivioA. (1991). Images in mind: The evolution of a theory. Sussex, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
52.
PerkinsD. (1977). The limits of intuition. Leonardo, 10, 119–125.
53.
PerkinsD. (1981). The minds best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Petitmengin-PeugeotC. (1999). The intuitive experience. In VarelaF.ShearJ. (Eds.), The view from within. First-person approaches to the study of consciousness (pp. 43–77). London, UK: Imprint Academic.
55.
PohjannoroU. (2008). Paikkoja polun varrelta: Empiirisiä huomioita sävellysprosessista. [Views along a pathway: Empirical observations over a compositional process]. Musiikki [Journal of the Finnish Musicological Society], 38(3–4), 218–274.
56.
PohjannoroU. (2014). Inspiration and decision-making: A case study of a composer’s intuitive and reflective thought. Musicæ Scientiæ, 18(2), 166–188.
57.
PolicastroE. (1999). Intuition. In RuncoM.PritzkerS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 89–93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58.
PretzJ. (2011). Types of intuition: Inferential and holistic. In SinclairM. (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 17–27). Massachusetts, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
59.
PretzJ.NaplesA.SternbergR. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In DavidsonJ.SternbergJ. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
ReberP. J.BeemanM.PallerK. A. (2013). Human memory systems: A framework for understanding the neurocognitive foundations of intuition. In SchmorrowD.FidopiastisC. M. (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition (pp. 474–483). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
61.
ReitmanW. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York, NY: Wiley.
62.
Rielvan A.HorváthC. (2014). Conceptualizing intuition as a mental faculty: Toward a ‘critique of intuitive reason’ and a process model of intuition. In SinclairM. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods on intuition (pp. 42–56). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
63.
Sadler-SmithE. (2008). Inside intuition. New York, NY: Routledge.
64.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
65.
SergentC.DehaeneS. (2014). Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 15, 720–728.
66.
ShivB.LoewensteinG.BecharaA. (2005). The dark side of emotion in decision-making: when individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 85–92.
67.
SimonH. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 57–64.
68.
SinclairM. (2010). Misconceptions about intuition. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 378–386.
69.
SlobodaJ. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
70.
SmithE.DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
71.
SunR.MathewsR. (2012). Implicit cognition, emotion, and meta-cognitive control. Mind & Society, 11, 107–119.
72.
ThompsonV.TurnerP.PennycookG. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
73.
TiedensL.LintonS. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty. The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988.
74.
VandekerckhoveM.PankseppJ. (2009). The flow of anoetic to noetic and autonoetic consciousness: A vision of unknowing (anoetic) and knowing (noetic) consciousness in the remembrance of things past and imagined futures. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1018–1028.
75.
VermerschP. (2009). Describing the practice of introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 20–57.
76.
WigginsG. (2012). Defining inspiration? Modelling the non-conscious creative process. In CollinsD. (Ed.), The act of musical composition (pp. 233–253). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
77.
YinR. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
