This paper challenges International Relations (IR) scholars to take a more expansive approach to nuclear politics by calling attention to the destructive and underappreciated effects of nuclear waste, the byproduct of making, detonating, and maintaining nuclear weapons. By underscoring the significance of nuclear waste to questions of nuclear violence, we highlight the potential for interdisciplinary scholarship on nuclear waste to expand the range of analytical tools, to better contend with intersectional issues, and to provide a means to account for the ongoing violence beyond the singular event of a nuclear explosion. By accounting for the range of effects of nuclear weapons beyond testing, usage, or the threat of usage, this paper invites conversations on the destructive, worldmaking impact rendered through the nuclear age.
BiswasS. (2001). Nuclear apartheid as a political position: Race as a postcolonial resource?Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600406
3.
BiswasS. (2014). Nuclear desire: Power and postcolonial order. University of Minnesota Press.
4.
CainS. (2021). Bittersweet: How sorrow and longing make us whole. Crown.
CohnC. (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(4), 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1086/494362
7.
DebsA.MonteiroN. P. (2017). Nuclear politics: The strategic causes of proliferation. Cambridge University Press.
8.
DeudneyD.IkenberryG. J. (2011). Pushing and pulling: The Western system, nuclear weapons and soviet change. International Politics, 48(4-5), 496–544. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.23
9.
EnloeC. (2014). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international relations (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
10.
FredericksR. (2020). Anthropocenic discards: Embodied infrastructures and uncanny exposures at Dakar’s dump. Antipode, 57(5), 1663–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12796
11.
HennaouiL.NurzhanM. (2023). Dealing with a nuclear past: Revisiting the cases of Algeria and Kazakhstan through a decolonial lens. The International Spectator, 58(4), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2234817
Latin American and Caribbean Thirteenth Feminist Encounter for Latin America (EFLAC XIII). (2018). 140. A political manifesto for the emancipation of our bodies. In: WeissP. A. (Ed.), Feminist manifestos: A global documentary reader (pp. 634–639). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479805419.003.0144
MascoJ. (2020). The future of fallout, and other episodes of radioactive world-making. Duke University Press.
20.
MearsheimerJ. J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security, 15(1), 5–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981
21.
MuppidiH. (2012). The colonial signs of international relations. Columbia University Press.
22.
NarangV. (2022). Seeking the bomb: Strategies of nuclear proliferation. Princeton University Press.
23.
NixonR. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
24.
RoyD. (2018). Will the real atomic subaltern please stand up? Critiquing nuclear historiography through nucliteracy. Interventions, 20(5), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2018.1487796
25.
SaganS. D.WaltzK. N. (1995). The spread of nuclear weapons: A debate. W.W. Norton Company.
