Populist and Anti-Populist Discourses in Nigerian and Turkish Presidential Elections: Populist Zeitgeist Debate Revisited

Abstract

Today, many scholars question whether populism has indeed become the zeitgeist detriment of democracies around the globe. This study compares populist discourses in Nigeria and Türkiye during their 2023 presidential campaigns. Utilizing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), it explores how did the victorious presidential candidates employ digital media platforms to disseminate their populist and anti-populist messages? This research reveals that Bola Tinubu’s anti-populist discourses mitigated polarization and led to a smooth electoral success in Nigeria. In sharp contrast, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s populist discourses exacerbated political divisions in Türkiye. It concludes that populism neither universally dominates global trends nor guarantees electoral victory, even in polarized Eurasian-African context. Nonetheless, whether labeled as populist or anti-populist during electoral campaigns, such characterizations do not necessarily translate into corresponding policy actions once in office.

Keywords

populist zeitgeist populism anti-populism critical discourse analysis Türkiye Nigeria democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adebayo

J. O.

(2017). The role of peace journalism in the deconstruction of elections and the “national question” in Nigeria. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 12(1), 140–156.

Arıcan

Y. F.

(2023). The Role of Civil Society in the Post-Earthquake Period in Turkey. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/fh-affit_06-Civil-Society-in-the-Post-Earthquake-Period_EN_v2.pdf.

Auwal

A. M.

Ersoy

(2022). Peace journalism strategy for covering online political discourses in a multipolar society and the new public sphere. Information Development, 38(1), 6–22.

Aydın-Düzgit

Balta

(2019). When elites polarize over polarization: Framing the polarization debate in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 60(2018), 153–176.

Babalola

(2019). Oil centrism and Nigeria’s political economy. In The political economy of federalism in Nigeria. Federalism and internal conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05493-9_3

Böhmelt

Ezrow

(2023). Policy issue salience and legislative output of populist governments: Evidence from immigration policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(11), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2255658

Bola

(2021b). 12: A milestone for democracy. Available at: https://www.bolatinubuelibrary.com/resource/june-12-a-milestone-for-democracy/

Bos

Brants

(2014). Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114545709

Central Intelligence Agency . (2024). Turkey (Türkiye). In The world factbook. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey-turkiye/#people-and-society

10.

Chakravartty

Srirupa

(2017). Mediatized populisms| mediatized populisms: Inter-asian lineages—introduction. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 20.

11.

Engesser

Ernst

Esser

Büchel

(2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126.

12.

Erdoğan

Uyan-Semerci

(2022). Kutuplaşmayı Nasıl Aşarız? In Turkuaz Lab Yayınları.

13.

Esen

(2022). Post-2023 election scenarios in Turkey (No. 55/2022). SWP Comment.

14.

Esen

Gumuscu

(2023). How Erdoğan's populism won again. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 21–32.

15.

Esser

(2019). Advances in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of evidence. Political Communication, 36(4), 680–686.

16.

Esser

Stępińska

Hopmann

D. N.

(2016). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). Routledge.

17.

Falk

E. B.

Spunt

R. P.

Lieberman

M. D.

(2012). Ascribing beliefs to ingroup and outgroup political candidates: Neural correlates of perspective-taking, issue importance and days until the election. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 731–743.

18.

Furman

Tunç

(2020). The end of the Habermassian ideal? Political communication on Twitter during the 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum. Policy & Internet, 12(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.218

19.

Hameleers

Vliegenthart

(2020). The rise of a populist zeitgeist? A content analysis of populist media coverage in newspapers published between 1990 and 2017. Journalism Studies, 21(1), 19–36.

20.

Havlík

Kluknavská

(2022). The populist vs anti populist divide in the time of pandemic: The 2021 Czech national election and its consequences for European politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(Annual Review), 2.

21.

Hobolt

Lawall

Tilley

(2023). The polarizing effect of partisan echo chambers. American Political Science Review.

22.

İşeri

Ersoy

(2021). Framing the Syrian operations: Populism in foreign policy and the polarized news media of Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 2870–2893.

23.

Jagers

Walgrave

(2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.

24.

Kalaycıoğlu

(2021). Kulturkampf and voting behavior in Turkey: A key to Turkish party politics? In Elections and public opinion in Turkey (pp. 133–156). Routledge.

25.

Kitzberger

(2023). Media-politics parallelism and populism/anti-populism divides in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina. Political Communication, 40(1), 69–91.

26.

KONDA . (2022). Türkiye: 100 kişi olsaydı. KONDA. Available at: https://konda.com.tr/duyuru/22/turkiye-100-kisi-olsaydi

27.

Kubin

Sikorski

(2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070

28.

Kurt

(2019). Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: A case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082

29.

Laclau

(2005). On populist reason. Verso.

30.

Levitsky

Ziblatt

(2018). How wobbly is our democracy. NY TIMES.

31.

Liddiard

(2019). Is populism really a problem for democracy. Wilson Center.

32.

Luo

(2024). We got our guy!: Populist attitudes after populists gain power. Socius, 10(23780231241234640), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241234638

33.

Machin

Mayr

(2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Sage Publications Ltd.

34.

Mardin

Ş.

(1973). Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Dædalus, pp. 169–190.

35.

Mazzoleni

Bracciale

(2018). Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1.

36.

Mbah

P. O.

Nwangwu

Ugwu Scand Simons

(2019). Contentious elections, political exclusion, and challenges of national integration in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1565615

37.

Melek

İşeri

(2022). When a polarized media system meets a pandemic: Framing the political discord over COVID-19 aid campaigns in Turkey. In PV Aelst and JG blumler, political communication in the time of coronavirus (pp. 136–154): Routledge.

38.

Moffitt

(2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation (pp. 14–17). Stanford University Press.

39.

Moffitt

(2018). The populism/anti-populism divide in Western Europe. Democratic Theory, 5(2), 1–16.

40.

Moffitt

(2020). The trouble with anti-populism: Why the champions of civility keep losing. The Guardian, 14(February), 1.

41.

Mudde

(2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.

42.

Mudde

Kaltwasser

C. R.

(2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

43.

Müller

J. W.

(2016). What is populism? Pennsylvania.

44.

Neuner

F. G.

Wratil

(2022). The populist marketplace: Unpacking the role of “thin” and “thick” ideology. Political Behavior, 44(2), 551–574.

45.

Nigeria . (2023a). Freedom in the world 2023. Freedom House. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/country/nigeria/freedom-world/2023

46.

Nigeria . (2023b). Inside the opinion polls that got it wrong .

Premium Times

March 3, 2023. https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/587189-nigerias-2023-presidential-election-inside-the-opinion-polls-that-got-it-wrong.html

47.

Nigeria . (2023c). Trust and turnout define 2023 elections. Chatham House Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/03/nigeria-trust-and-turnout-define-2023-elections

48.

Nigeria . (2023d). Who is peter Obi of the labour party? BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-61865502

49.

Nyamekye

Zengulaaru

Addae

Mutawakil

A.-R.

Ntiakoh

G. B.

(2024). Culture, critical pedagogy, and critical thinking among ‘children’ in Ghana: A critical discourse analysis of childhood constructions in Ghanaian proverbs. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 0(0), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241228773

50.

Ogenga

(2020). Kenya and the emerging power-shift in global political-economy: Right-wing populism and social media activism. Journalism, 10(1), 35–56.

51.

Okibe

H. B.

(2022). Ethnicity, religion, and polarization in Nigeria. Wilson Center- Africa Up Close. Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/ethnicity-religion-and-polarization-in-nigeria

52.

Okwelum

C. O.

(2023). President Tinubu inauguration in Nigeria: To be or not to be? European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(3), 285–298.

53.

Olivas Osuna

J. J.

(2021). From chasing populists to deconstructing populism: A new multidimensional approach to understanding and comparing populism. European Journal of Political Research, 60(4), 829–853.

54.

Öniş

(2015). Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22–41.

55.

Postill

(2018). Populism and social media: A global perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 754–765.

56.

Roberts

K. M.

(2022). Populism and polarization in comparative perspective: Constitutive, spatial, and institutional dimensions. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 680–702.

57.

Rooduijn

(2013). A populist zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in western Europe. Universiteit van Amsterdam.

58.

Sayarı

(2013). Siyasi Partiler ve parti sistemleri. Karşılaştırmalı siyaset, sabri SAYARI, hasret Dikici bilgin (der.). In İstanbul bilgi üniversitesi yayınları. İstanbul.

59.

Schnyder

Radl

Toth

Kucukuzun

Turnšek

Çelik

Pajnik

(2024). Theorizing and mapping media ownership networks in authoritarian-populist contexts: A comparative analysis of Austria, Hungary, Slovenia, and Turkey. Media, Culture & Society, 46(1), 38–59.

60.

Schuck

A. R.

De Vreese

C. H.

(2015). Public support for referendums in Europe: A cross-national comparison in 21 countries. Electoral Studies, 38(2015), 149–158.

61.

Selçuk

Hekimci

(2020). The rise of the democracy–authoritarianism cleavage and opposition coordination in Turkey (2014–2019). Democratization, 27(8), 1496–1514.

62.

Somer

(2019). Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 42–61.

63.

Somer

Glüpker-Kesebir

(2016). Is islam the solution? Comparing Turkish islamic and secular thinking toward ethnic and religious minorities. Journal of Church & State, 58(3), 529–555.

64.

Somer

McCoy

J. L.

Luke

R. E.

(2023). Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies. In Resilience of democracy (pp. 61–80). Routledge.

65.

State House . (2023). First inaugural address by president bola ahmed Tinubu delivered on may 29, 2023 at the eagle square. Abuja. Available at: https://statehouse.gov.ng/news/first-inaugural-address-by-president-bola-ahmed-tinubu-delivered-on-may-29-2023-at-the-eagle-square-abuja/

66.

Stavrakakis

(2018). Populism, anti-populism and democracy. Political insight, 9(3), 33–35.

67.

Steppat

Castro Herrero

Esser

(2022). Selective exposure in different political information environments–How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use. European Journal of Communication, 37(1), 82–102.

68.

Trenz

H. J.

(2023). Democracy in the digital public sphere: Disruptive or self-corrective? Communication Theory, 33(2-3), 143–152.

69.

Tucker

J. A.

Theocharis

Roberts

M. E.

Barberá

(2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59.

70.

Turkish Statistical Institute . (2023). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları 2023. TUIK. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2023-49684

71.

Ugwuoke

C. O.

Ajah

B. O.

Onyejegbu

C. D.

(2020). Developing patterns of violent crimes in Nigerian democratic transitions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53(101457), 101457.

72.

Van Aelst

Strömbäck

Aalberg

Esser

De Vreese

Matthes Jand Stanyer

(2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 1.

73.

van Dijk

T. A.

(2003). Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen

Schiffrin

Hamilton

(Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 466–485): Blackwell.

74.

Verjee

Kwaja

Onubogu

(2019). Nigeria’s 2019 elections: Change, continuity, and the risks to Peace. The United States Institute of Peace. Available at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2018/09/nigerias-2019-elections-change-continuity-and-risks-peace

75.

Weyland

(2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 1–22.

76.

World Bank . (2023a). Nigeria overview. World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/overview#1

77.

World Bank . (2023b). Population, total - Nigeria. World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=NG

78.

World Bank . (2023c). Turkey overview. World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/turkey/overview

79.

Yavuz

M. H.

Öztürk

A. E.

(2019). Turkish secularism and Islam under the reign of Erdoğan. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(1), 1–9.

80.

Chan

T. F.

(2023). Representing the ‘little fresh meat’ phenomenon in the Chinese English-medium news media: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 0(0), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231184407

81.

Zhang

(2020). Right-wing populism with Chinese characteristics? Identity, otherness and global imaginaries in debating world politics online. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1), 88–115.

82.

Zulianello

Albertini

Ceccobelli

(2018). A populist zeitgeist? The communication strategies of western and Latin American political leaders on facebook. The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(4), 439–457.