Do citizens who strongly exhibit populist attitudes support direct democracy? Existing studies tend to claim that populists support direct democracy because of their stealth-democratic orientation or argue that stealth democrats want direct democracy due to the populist nature of stealth-democratic attitudes. Yet, albeit both populists and stealth democrats reject elite rule, they prefer direct democracy for different reasons. Populists support direct democracy as a means to implement the volonté générale, whereas stealth democrats view it as holding politicians accountable for ineffective policy solutions. Our analysis of representative survey data in four European democracies (France, Germany, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) reveals that individuals with stronger populist attitudes indeed support direct democracy more than citizens with no strong populist attitudes. This effect is observed when controlling for stealth-democratic orientations and when using a measure separating the feature populism shares with stealth democracy – anti-elitism – from the one unique to populism, people-centrism.
AckermannA (2018) Stealth Democracy in der Schweiz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
2.
AkkermanAMuddeCZasloveA (2014) How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies47: 1324–1353.
3.
AlbertazziDMuellerS (2013) Populism and liberal democracy: populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland. Government and Opposition48: 343–371.
4.
AslanidisP (2016) Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies65: 88–104.
5.
BarberB (1988) The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BarneyDLaycockD (1999) Right-populists and plebiscitary politics in Canada. Party Politics5: 317–339.
7.
BarrR (2009) Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics15: 29–48.
8.
Beiser-McGrathJBeiser-McGrathL (2019) Problems with Products? Control Strategies for Models with Interactive and Quadratic Effects. Manuscript. ETH Zurich: University of Konstanz.
9.
BengtssonÅMattilaM (2009) Direct democracy and its critics: support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland. West European Politics32: 1031–1048.
10.
BowlerSDenemarkDDonovanT, et al. (2017) Right-wing populist party supporters: dissatisfied but not direct democrats. European Journal of Political Research56: 70–91.
CaramaniD (2017) Will versus reason: the populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review111: 54–67.
13.
Castanho SilvaBJungkunzSHelblingM, et al. (2020) An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly73(2): 409–424.
14.
CoppedgeMGerringJAltmanD, et al. (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: a new approach. Perspectives on Politics9: 247–267.
15.
DahlR (1998) On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
DaltonR (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DonovanTKarpJ (2006) Popular support for direct democracy. Party Politics12: 671–688.
18.
GallagherM (2013) Elections and referendums. In: CaramaniD (ed) Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–262.
19.
HainmuellerJHazlettC (2014) Kernel regularized least squares: reducing misspecification bias with a flexible and interpretable machine learning approach. Political Analysis22: 143–168.
20.
HawkinsKRovira KaltwasserCR (2018) Introduction: the ideational approach. In: HawkinsKCarlinRLittvayL, et al. (eds) The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Method. London: Routledge, pp. 27–50.
21.
HibbingJTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Believes About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HuberRARuthSP (2017) Mind the gap! Populism, participation and representation in Europe. Swiss Political Science Review23: 462–484.
23.
HuberRASchimpfCH (2016) Friend or foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America. Political Studies64: 872–889.
24.
HuberRASchimpfCH (2017) On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance5: 146–165.
25.
JacobsKAkkermanAZasloveA (2018) The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes. Acta Politica53: 517–541.
26.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44: 341–355.
27.
KoestnerRLosierGWorrenN, et al. (1995) False consensus effects for the 1992 Canadian referendum. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science27: 214–225.
28.
KriesiHP (2014) The populist challenge. West European Politics37: 361–378.
29.
KrouwelAAbtsK (2007) Varieties of Euroscepticism and populist mobilization: transforming attitudes from mild Euroscepticism to harsh Eurocynicism. Acta Politica42: 252–270.
30.
LamparskiN (2016) Austria far-right eyes presidency on ‘day of reckoning’. Agence France Press, 12 April.
31.
LandwehrCFaasTHarmsP (2017) Bröckelt der verfahrenskonsens? einstellungen zu politischen entscheidungen und demokratischen entscheidungsverfahren in zeiten des populismus. Leviathan45: 35–54.
32.
Marcos-MarneHPlaza-ColodroCFreyburgT (2020) Who votes for new parties? economic voting, political ideology and populist attitudes. West European Politics43(1): 1–21.
33.
MedvicS (2019) Explaining support for stealth democracy. Representation5: 1–19.
34.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39: 542–563.
35.
MüllerJW (2014) ‘The people must be extracted from within the people’: reflections on populism. Constellations21: 483–493.
36.
NCCR Democracy (2016) Democratic Governance and Citizenship Survey: Electronic Dataset and Codebook. Zurich: University of Zurich.
37.
NebloMEsterlingKKennedyR, et al. (2010) Who wants to deliberate–and why?American Political Science Review104: 566–583.
38.
PatemanC (2000) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PauwelsT (2014) Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. London: Routledge.
40.
RooduijnM (2014) The nucleus of populism: in search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition49: 573–599.
41.
RooduijnMde LangeSLvan Der BrugW (2014) A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics20: 563–575.
42.
RossLGreeneDHouseP (1977) The ‘false consensus effect’: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology13: 279–301.
43.
Rovira KaltwasserCTaggartPOchoa EspejoP, et al. (2017) Populism: an overview of the concept and the state of the art. In: Rovira KaltwasserCTaggartPOchoa EspejoP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
44.
Ruth-LovellSWelpY (2019) Populism and Democracy in Latin America. Berlin: Populist Tide Workshop Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
45.
SchillerT (2011) Local Direct Democracy in Europe. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
46.
SchulzAMüllerPSchemerC, et al. (2018) Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30: 316–326.
47.
StokerGHayC (2017) Understanding and challenging populist negativity towards politics: the perspectives of British Citizens. Political Studies65: 4–23.
48.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13: 95–110.
49.
StrebelMKüblerDMarcinkowskiF (2019) The importance of input and output legitimacy in democratic governance: evidence from a population-based survey experiment in four west European countries. European Journal of Political Research58(2): 488–513.
50.
TaggartP (2004) Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies9: 269–288.
51.
TorcalMTrechselA (2016) Explaining citizens’ evaluations of democracy. In: FerrínMKriesiHP (eds) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206–232.
52.
UrbinatiN (2014) Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53.
Van HauwaertSVan KesselS (2018) Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research57: 68–92.
54.
Van KesselS (2015) Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
55.
WebbP (2013) Who is willing to participate? dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research52: 747–772.
56.
WintourP (2014) Nigel Farage wants to give voters a greater voice by extending referendums. The Guardian, Available at: https://tinyurl.com/y88zm9yl.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
