Scholarly literature has recently developed the notions of Anthropocene geopolitics and planetary security. How these relate to and whether they inform states’ foreign policy, however, remains a largely underdeveloped issue. This article goes some way toward addressing this gap both theoretically and empirically. Theoretically, it unpacks how traditional and Anthropocene geopolitics diverge in their approach toward the security repercussions of climate change and teases out the emanating foreign policy implications. These revolve around different levels of climate ambition, divergent approaches to fossil energy geopolitics, and differing weighting of planetary security versus mainstream geopolitical threats. Against this theoretical background, this article empirically zooms in on the EU case to explore which geopolitical mindset guides EU’s pursuit of climate change concerns and their incorporation in the EU foreign policy design. The analysis finds that, despite its comprehensive foreign climate policy initiatives, the EU remains fixed to a traditional geopolitical mindset and a foreign policy that underappreciates planetary security threats. This article subsequently operationalizes a foreign policy design informed by the Anthropocene geopolitics approach and sketches what it would entail.
AylingJ.GunninghamN. (2017). Non-state governance and climate policy: The fossil fuel divestment movement. Climate Policy, 17(2), 131–149.
5.
BarnettJ.AdgerN. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political geography, 26(6), 639–655.
6.
BlundenM. (2012). Geopolitics and the northern sea route. International Affairs, 88(1), 115–129.
7.
BradfordA. (2012). The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(1), 1–68.
8.
CasierT. (2018). The different faces of power in European Union–Russia relations. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(1), 101–117.
9.
ChenZ. (2016). China, the European Union and the fragile world order. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 775–792.
10.
CiscarJ.RisingJ.KoppR.FeyenL. (2019). Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), 084010.
11.
DalbyS. (2002). Security and ecology in the age of globalization. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 8, 95–108.
12.
DalbyS. (2013a). Climate change. The RUSI Journal, 158(3), 34–43.
13.
DalbyS. (2013b). The geopolitics of climate change. Political Geography, 37, 38–47.
14.
DalbyS. (2014). Rethinking geopolitics: Climate security in the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 5(1), 1–9.
15.
DamroC. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 682–699.
16.
DellaSalaD. A.GoldsteinM.EliasS.JenningsB.LacherT.MineauP.PyareS. (2018). The Anthropocene: How the great acceleration is transforming the planet at unprecedented levels. Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 1, 1–7.
DoddsK. (2001). Political geography ill: Critical geopolitics after ten years. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 469–484
19.
DoddsK.KuusM.SharpJ. (2013). Introduction: Geopolitics and its critics. In DoddsK.KuusM.SharpJ. (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to critical geopolitics (pp. 3–14). Ashgate.
20.
DouthwaiteR. (2006). The ecology of money. The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability.
21.
EckersleyR. (2007). Ecological intervention: prospects and limits. Ethics & International Affairs, 21(3), 293–316.
22.
EggertR.WadiaC.AndersonC.BauerD.FieldsF.MeinertL.TaylorP. (2016). Rare earths: market disruption, innovation, and global supply chains. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 41, 199–222.
European Commission. (2019). The European green deal: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2019) 640 final. (11.12.2019).
25.
European Commission. (2020). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). COM(2020) 80 final. 2020/0036 (COD). (4.3.2020).
European Union. (2019). The European Union’s global strategy. Three years on, looking forward. European Union Global Strategy.
28.
FalknerR. (2016a). A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits, and international legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), 87–101.
29.
FalknerR. (2016b). The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.
30.
FarS.YoungsR. (2015). Energy union and EU global strategy: the undefined link. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies Report, 5, 1–66.
31.
FlintC.ZhuC. (2019). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The belt and road initiative. Geoforum, 99, 95–101.
32.
GeelsF. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40.
33.
Global Commission on the Geopolitics of Energy Transformation. (2019). A new world: The geopolitics of the energy transformation. International Renewable Energy Agency.
34.
GoldthauA. (2017). The G20 must govern the shift to low-carbon energy. Nature, 546(7657), 203–205.
35.
GordonR. (2017). The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton University Press.
36.
GottmanJ. (1942). The background of geopolitics. The Journal of Military History, 6, 197–206.
37.
HarrisP. (2011). Reconceptualizing global governance. In DryzekJ.NorgaardR. B.SchlosbergD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 639–652). Oxford University Press.
38.
HeywoodA. (2011). Global Politics. Palgrave.
39.
HuberM. (2015). Theorizing energy geographies. Geography Compass, 9(6), 327–338.
KacowiczA. (2000). Geopolitics and territorial issues: relevance for South America. Geopolitics, 5(1), 81–100.
42.
KlareM. (2012). The race for what’s left: The global scramble for the world’s last resources. Macmillan.
43.
KuusM. (2010). Critical geopolitics: Encyclopaedia of International Studies (pp. 1–28). Oxford Research
44.
Le BillonP. (2001). The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography, 20(5), 561–584.
45.
Leal-ArcasR.ArmasE. (2018). The climate-energy-trade nexus in EU external relations. In MinasS.NtousasV. (Eds.), EU climate diplomacy: Politics, law and negotiations (pp. 153–168). Routledge.
46.
LohmannL. (2008). Carbon trading, climate justice and the production of ignorance: Ten examples. Development, 51(3), 359–365.
47.
LohmannL. (2010). Neoliberalism and the calculable world: The rise of carbon trading. In BebbingtonT., et al. (Eds.), The rise and fall of neoliberalism: The collapse of an economic order? (pp. 25–40). Zed Books.
48.
LuttwakE. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest20, 17–23.
49.
MahbubaniK. (2013). The great convergence: Asia, the west, and the logic of one world. Public Affairs.
50.
MannersI. (2002). Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.
51.
McGregorA.RobertsC.CousinsF. (2013). Two degrees: the built environment and our changing climate. Routledge.
52.
MehlingM.DasK.DrögeS.van AsseltH.VerkuijlC. (2017, October). How to design border carbon adjustments that work for the climate (pp. 1–6). Climate Strategies.
53.
MercilleJ. (2008). The radical geopolitics of US foreign policy: Geopolitical and geoeconomic logics of power. Political Geography, 27, pp. 570–586
54.
MobjörkM.SmithD.RüttingerL. (2016). Towards a global resilience agenda: Action on climate fragility risks. Clingendael Institute, Adelphi, SIPRI.
55.
MoravscikA. (2003). Striking a new transatlantic bargain. Foreign Affairs, 82, 74–89.
56.
MulliganS. (2010). Energy, environment, and security: Critical links in a post-peak world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 79–100.
57.
NasiritousiN. (2015). Shapers, brokers and doers: the dynamic roles of non-state actors in global climate change governance (Vol. 667). Linköping University Electronic Press.
58.
NguyenH. (2016). The US–EU partnership: More necessary than ever. Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(2), 225–235.
59.
NordhausW. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370.
60.
OberthürS. (2016). Where to go from Paris? The European Union in climate geopolitics. Global Affairs, 2(2), 119–130.
OdumH. (2007). Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century: The hierarchy of energy. Columbia University Press.
63.
ParkerG. (1998). Geopolitics: Past, present and future. Pinter.
64.
ProedrouF. (2012). EU energy security in the gas sector: Evolving dynamics, policy dilemmas and prospects. Ashgate.
65.
ProedrouF. (2018). Energy policy and security under climate change. Palgrave.
66.
ProedrouF. (2019). Contesting Greek gas policy: Geopolitical, energy and climate considerations. The International Spectator, 54(2), 87–101.
67.
ProedrouF. (2020). Behind the EU’s energy and climate policy conundrum: Erroneous power toolbox, deadlocks, and the way forward. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 402–418.
68.
RoehrkastenS.WestphalK. (2013). IRENA and Germany’s foreign renewable energy policy (Working Paper). Stiftung Wissenshaft und Politik (SWP), 1, 1–17.
69.
RubensteinR. (2017). State security, human security, and the problem of complementarity. In JacobbE. (Ed.), Rethinking security in the twenty-first century (pp. 225–243). Palgrave Macmillan.
70.
ScholtenD. (2018). The geopolitics of renewables—an introduction and expectations. In ScholtenD. (Ed.), The geopolitics of renewables (pp. 1–33). Springer.
71.
SmithC. (2003). American Empire: Roosevelt’s geographer and the prelude to globalization. University of California Press.
72.
SteinbergerJ.RobertsJ. (2010). From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 425–433.
73.
SusskindL.SaleemH. (2014). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford University Press.
74.
TitievskaiaJ. (2019). At a glance. Using trade policy to tackle climate change. European Parliamentary Research Service.
75.
TsygankovA. (2016). Russia’s foreign policy: Change and continuity in national identity. Rowman & Littlefield.
UrpelainenJ.Van de GraafT. (2018). United States non-cooperation and the Paris agreement. Climate Policy, 18(7), 839–851.
78.
Van de GraafT. (2013). Fragmentation in global energy governance: Explaining the creation of IRENA. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 14–33.
79.
Van de GraafT. (2018). Battling for a shrinking market: oil producers, the renewables revolution, and the risk of stranded assets. In ScholtenD. (Ed.), The geopolitics of renewables (pp. 97–121). Springer.
80.
Van de GraafT.WestphalK. (2011). The G8 and G20 as global steering committees for energy: Opportunities and constraints. Global Policy, 2, 19–30.
81.
Van SchaikL.ReeceM.KunemanE. (2017). Climate change: Thematic study Clingendael. Clingedael.
82.
VitalisR. (2007). America’s kingdom: Mythmaking on the Saudi oil frontier. Stanford University Press.
83.
VoglerJ. (2005). The European contribution to global environmental governance. International Affairs, 81(4), 835–850.
84.
Von der LeyenU. (2019). A union that strives for more. My agenda for Europe: Political Guidelines for the next European Commission, 2019-2024. Publications Office of the EU.
85.
WackernagelM.MoranD.WhiteM. (2006). Ecological footprint accounts for advancing sustainability: Measuring human demands on nature. In LawnP. (Ed.), Sustainable development indicators in ecological economics (pp. 246–267). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
86.
Wallace-WellsD. (2019). The uninhabitable earth: A story of the future. Penguin.
87.
WendtA. (2003). Why a world state is inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542.
88.
WestphalK. (2012). Globalising the German energy transition. Stiftung Wissenshaft und Politik (SWP) Comments, 40, 1–7.
89.
YoungsR. (2014). Climate change and EU security policy: An unmet challenge. Carnegie Europe.
90.
ZelliF.PattbergP.StephanH.van AsseltH. (2013). Global climate governance and energy choices. In GoldthauA. (Ed.), The handbook of global energy policy (pp. 340–357). Wiley-Blackwell.
