Vection has been reported to be enhanced by wind, as long as the wind is a normal temperature and not hot. However, here we report that a hot wind can facilitate vection, as long as it is natural and consistent with the visual stimulus. We created a fire-corridor stimulus that was consistent with a hot wind and a control stimulus composed of cubes, which were irrelevant to a hot wind. We compared the vection strength induced by a fire-corridor (fire condition) visual stimulus with that induced by geometric cubes (no-fire condition) visual stimulus. There were three wind type conditions: a normal temperature wind, hot wind, and no wind. The results showed that a normal temperature wind facilitated vection and that a hot wind (but not a normal wind) highly enhanced vection when a fire-corridor stimulus was presented. These results suggest that vection is highly affected and modulated by high-level cognitive processes.
BonatoF.BubkaA.PalmisanoS. (2009).
Combined pitch and roll and cybersickness in a virtual environment. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine,
80, 941–945.
5.
BonatoF.BubkaA.PalmisanoS.PhillipD.MorenoG. (2008).
Vection change exacerbates simulator sickness in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,
17, 283–292.
6.
BourrellyA.VercherJ. L.BringouxL. (2010).
Pitch body orientation influences the perception of self-motion direction induced by optic flow. Neuroscience Letters,
482, 193–197.
7.
BrandtT.DichgansJ.KoenigE. (1973).
Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research,
5, 476–491.
8.
BubkaA.BonatoF. (2010).
Natural visual-field features enhance vection. Perception,
39, 627–635.
9.
GibsonJ. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems.
Houghton Mifflin.
KanoC. (1991).
The perception of self-motion induced by peripheral visual information in sitting and supine postures. Ecological Psychology,
3, 241–252.
LécuyerA.BurkhardtJ. M.EtienneL. (2004). Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: The perception of pseudo-haptic textures [Paper presentation]. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 239–246). ACM.
14.
LepecqJ. C.GiannopuluI.BaudonniereP. M. (1995).
Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children. Perception,
24, 435–449.
15.
MoriM.SenoT. (2017).
Effect of body posture on vection. Transactions of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan,
22, 391–394. (in Japanese language)
16.
MurataK.SenoT. (2017).
The facilitation and inhibition of vection by wind of hot and normal temperature. Transactions of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan,
22, 287–290. (In Japanese language)
17.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (1998).
Orientation of selective effects of body tilt on visually induced perception of self-motion. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
87, 667–672.
18.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (1999).
Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception,
28, 893–902.
19.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (2000).
A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer’s self-motion—A report of a new motion illusion: Inverted vection. Vision Research,
40, 2915–2923.
20.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (2003).
Sustained deviation of gaze direction can affect “inverted vection” induced by the foreground motion. Vision Research,
43, 745–749.
21.
OgawaM.SenoT. (2014).
Vection is modulated by the semantic meaning of stimuli and experimental instructions. Perception,
43, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7639
22.
PalmisanoS.AllisonR. S.SchiraM. M.BarryR. J. (2015).
Future challenges for vection research: Definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases. Frontiers in Psychology,
6, 193.
23.
PalmisanoS.ChanA. Y. (2004).
Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands. Perception,
33, 987–1000.
24.
PalmisanoS.KimJ.AllisonR.BonatoF. (2011).
Simulated viewpoint jitter shakes sensory conflict accounts of vection. Seeing and Perceiving,
24, 173–200.
25.
ProtheroJ. D.ParkerD. E. (2003). A unified approach to presence and motion sickness. In L. J. Hettinger & M. W. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments: Applications, implications, and human performance issues (pp. 47–66). Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
RieckeB. E. (2009).
Cognitive and higher-level contributions to illusory self-motion perception (“vection”): Does the possibility of actual motion affect vection?Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science,
28, 135–139.
27.
RieckeB. E. (2011). “Compelling self-motion through virtual environments without actual self-motion—Using self-motion illusions (“vection”) to improve user experience in VR”. In J. J. Kim (Ed.), Virtual reality (pp. 149–176). InTech.
28.
RieckeB. E.FeuereissenD.RieserJ. J. (2008).
Auditory self-motion illusions (“circular vection”) can be facilitated by vibrations and the potential for actual motion [Paper presentation]. ACM APGV 2008 Conference Proceedings (pp. 147–154).
29.
RieckeB. E.Schulte-PelkumJ. (2013). Perceptual and cognitive factors for self-motion simulation in virtual environments: How can self-motion illusions (“vection”) be utilized? In F. Steinicke, Y. Visell, J. Campos, & A. Lécuyer (Eds.), Human walking in virtual environments (pp. 27–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8432-6_2
30.
RieckeB. E.Schulte-PelkumJ.AvraamidesM. N.Von Der HeydeM.BüLthoffH. H. (2006).
Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception,
3, 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166087.1166091
31.
RieckeB. E.VästfjällD.LarssonP.Schulte-PelkumJ. (2005).
Top-down and multi-modal influences on self-motion perception in virtual reality. Proceedings of HCI International,
2005, 1–10.
32.
RieserJ. J.PickH. L.AshmeadD. H.GaringA. E. (1995).
Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
21, 480–497.
33.
SakuraiK.KuboderaT.GroveP.SakamotoS.SuzukiY. (2010).
Multi-modally perceived direction of self-motion from orthogonally directed visual and vestibular stimulation. Journal of Vision,
10, 866.
Seno, T., Murata, K., Fuji, Y., Kanaya, H., Ogawa, M., Tokunaga, K., & Palmisano, S. (2018). Vection is enhanced by increased exposure to optic flow. i-Perception, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518774069
40.
SenoT.OgawaM.ItoH.SunagaS. (2011).
Consistent air flow to the body facilitates vection. Perception,
40, 1237–1240.
41.
SenoT.SawaiK. I.KanayaH.WakebeT.OgawaM.FujiiY.PalmisanoS. (2017).
The oscillating potential model of visually induced vection.i-Perception,
8, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517742176
42.
StróżakP.AugustynowiczP.RatomskaM.FrancuzP.Fudali-CzyżA. (2019).
Vection attenuates N400 event-related potentials in a change-detection task. Perception,
48, 702–730.
43.
SuzukiW.SenoT.YamashitaW.IchinoheN.TakeichiH.PalmisanoS. (2019).
Vection induced by low-level motion extracted from complex animation films. Experimental Brain Research,
237, 3321–3332.
44.
TamadaY.SenoT. (2015).
Roles of size, position, and speed of stimulus in vection with stimuli projected on a ground surface. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance,
86, 794–802.
45.
TrutoiuL. C.StreuberS.MohlerB. J.Schulte-PelkumJ.BülthoffH. H. (2008). Tricking people into feeling like they are moving when they are not paying attention [Paper presentation]. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (p. 190). ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1394281.1394319
VäljamäeA.AlliprandiniP. M. Z.AlaisD.KleinerM. (2009).
Auditory landmarks enhance circular vection in multimodal virtual reality. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society,
57, 111–120.
48.
VäljamäeA.SenoT. (2016).
Modulation of recognition memory for emotional images by vertical vection. Frontiers in Psychology,
7, 39.
49.
WrightW. G. (2009). Linear vection in virtual environments can be strengthened by discordant inertial input [Paper presentation]. 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society) (pp. 1157–1160). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333425
50.
WrightW. G.DiZioP.LacknerJ. R. (2006).
Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: Dissociable mechanisms underlie perception. Journal of Vestibular Research,
16, 23–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
