We compared vection (visually induced illusory self-motion perception) among elementary school children and adults by measuring latency to onset, cumulative duration, and estimated strength of vection. Significantly stronger vection with shorter latency was observed in children compared with adults. Several possible causes (eg size-difference of the effective visual field) of the age-related differences are discussed.
BrandtTDichgansJKoenigE, 1973“Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception”Experimental Brain Research16476–491
2.
FischerMKornmüllerA, 1930“Optokinetisch ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetischer Nystagmus”Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie (Leipzig)41273–308
3.
HaibachPSlobounovSNewellK, 2009“Egomotion and vection in young and elderly adults”Gerontology55637–643
4.
HausmannMWaldieK ECorballisM C, 2003“Developmental changes in line bisection: A result of callosal maturation?”Neuropsychology17155–160
5.
KiselevSEspyK ASheffieldT, 2009“Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology102150–166
6.
LakowskiRAspinallP A, 1969“Static perimetry in young children”Vision Research9305–312
7.
LeibowitzH WPostR BRodemerC SWadlingtonW LLundyR M, 1980“Roll vection analysis of suggestion-induced visual field narrowing”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics28173–176
8.
LepecqJ KGiannopulIBaudonniereP M, 1995“Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children”Perception24435–449
9.
McAuleyTWhiteD A, 2011“A latent variables examination of processing speed, response inhibition, and working memory during typical development”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology108453–468
10.
OhmiMHowardI PLandoltJ P, 1987“Circular vection as a function of foreground and background relationship”Perception1617–22
11.
PalmisanoSChanA Y C, 2004“Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands”Perception33987–1000
12.
RieckeB E, 2010“Compelling self-motion through virtual environments without actual self-motion—using self-motion illusions (“vection”) to improve user experience in VR”, in Virtual Reality Ed. KimJ-J, (New York: InTech) pp 161–188
13.
RieckeB EValjamaeASchulte-PelkumJ, 2009“Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality”ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP)6(2) Article 7
14.
SenoTItoHSunagaS, 2009“The object and background hypothesis for vection”Vision Research492973–2982
15.
SenoTItoHSunagaS, 2010“Vection after-effect from expanding/contracting stimuli”Seeing and Perceiving23273–294
SenoTItoHSunagaS, 2011b“Self-motion perception compresses time experienced in return travel”Perception40497–499
18.
SenoTTayaSItoHSunagaS, 2011c“Mental number line in depth revealed by vection”Perception401241–1244
19.
SenoTYamadaYIhayaK, 2011d“Narcissistic people cannot be moved easily by visual stimulation”Perception401390–1392
20.
ShiraiNYamaguchiM K, 2010“How do infants utilize radial optic flow for their motor actions?: A review of behavioral and neural studies”Japanese Psychological Research5278–90
