Interpreting the personality and the disposition of people is important for social interaction. Both emotional expression and facial width are known to affect personality perception. Moreover, both the apparent emotional expression and the apparent width-to-height ratio of the face change with head tilt. We investigated how head tilt affects judgements of trustworthiness and dominance and whether such trait judgements reflect apparent emotion or facial width. Sixty-seven participants rated the dominance, emotion, and trustworthiness of 24 faces posing with different head tilts while maintaining eye gaze at the camera. Both the 30° up and 20° down head postures were perceived as less trustworthy and more dominant (less submissive) than the head-level posture. Change in perceived trustworthiness and submissiveness with head tilt correlated with change in apparent emotional positivity but not change in facial width. Hence, our analysis suggests that apparent emotional expression provides a better explanation of perceived trustworthiness and dominance compared with cues to facial structure.
AdolphsR.TranelD.DamasioA. R. (1998).
The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature,
393, 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/30982
3.
BerryD. S.Zebrowitz-McArthurL. (1988).
What’s in a face? Facial maturity and the attribution of legal responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
14, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167288141003
4.
BrandA.BradleyM. T. (2012).
More voodoo correlations: When average-based measures inflate correlations. The Journal of General Psychology,
139, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.703711
5.
BurkeD.SulikowskiD. (2010).
A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces. Evolutionary Psychology,
8, 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800404
6.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008).
In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,
275, 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873
EffersonC.VogtS. (2013).
Viewing men’s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness. Scientific Reports,
3, 1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01047
EngellA. D.HaxbyJ. V.TodorovA. (2007).
Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
19, 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508
EwingL.CaulfieldF.ReadA.RhodesG. (2014).
Perceived trustworthiness of faces drives trust behaviour in children. Developmental Science,
18, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12218
13.
FranklinR.ZebrowitzL. A. (2013).
Older adults’ trait impressions of faces are sensitive to subtle resemblance to emotions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
37, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0150-4
14.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The Emotions.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
15.
GenioleS. N.MolnarD. S.CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2014).
The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
40, 1526–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036732
16.
HaselhuhnM. P.WongE. M. (2012).
Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences,
279, 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1193
17.
HehmanE.LeitnerJ. B.GaertnerS. L. (2013).
Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
49, 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.015
18.
HorstmannG.AnsorgeU. (2011).
Compatibility between tones, head movements, and facial expressions. Emotion,
11, 975–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023468
19.
KappasA.HessU.BarrC. L.KleckR. E. (1994).
Angle of regard: The effect of vertical viewing angle on the perception of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
18, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172289
20.
KeltnerD.AndersonC. (2000).
Saving face for Darwin: The functions and uses of embarrassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
9, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00091
21.
KnutsonB. (1996).
Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
20, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02281954
22.
KramerR. S. (2016).
Within-person variability in men’s facial width-to-height ratio. PeerJ,
4, e1801. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1801
23.
KrumhuberE.MansteadA. S.CoskerD.MarshallD.RosinP. L.KappasA. (2007).
Facial dynamics as indicators of trustworthiness and cooperative behavior. Emotion,
7, 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.730
24.
LewisG. J.LefevreC. E.BatesT. C. (2012).
Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents. Personality and Individual Differences,
52, 855–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.030
25.
LittleA. C.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2006).
What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality. Personality and Individual Differences,
41, 1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.015
26.
LyonsM. J.CampbellR.PlanteA.ColemanM.KamachiM.AkamatsuS. (2000).
The Noh mask effect: Vertical viewpoint dependence of facial expression perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
267, 2239–2245. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1274
27.
MignaultA.ChaudhuriA. (2003).
The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour,
27, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023914509763
28.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008).
The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,
105, 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
29.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL.GustawC. (2010).
Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime & Law,
16, 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902926141
30.
RezlescuC.DuchaineB.OlivolaC. Y.ChaterN. (2012).
Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PLoS One,
7, e34293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
31.
RosenbergE. L.EkmanP. (1995).
Conceptual and methodological issues in the judgment of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion,
19, 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250566
32.
RowlandD. A.PerrettD. I. (1995).
Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,
15, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.403830
33.
RuleN. O.KrendlA. C.IvcevicZ.AmbadyN. (2013).
Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
104, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031050
34.
SaidC. P.BaronS. G.TodorovA. (2009).
Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: Contributions of high and low spatial frequency information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
21, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21041
35.
SaidC. P.SebeN.TodorovA. (2009).
Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion,
9, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014681
36.
SatoW.KubotaY.OkadaT.MuraiT.YoshikawaS.SengokuA. (2002).
Seeing happy emotion in fearful and angry faces: Qualitative analysis of facial expression recognition in a bilateral amygdala-damaged patient. Cortex,
38, 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70040-6
37.
ShoemakerD. J.SouthD. R.LoweJ. (1973).
Facial stereotypes of deviants and judgments of guilt or innocence. Social Forces,
51, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576687
38.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2010).
Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science,
21, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647
39.
SutherlandC.OldmeadowJ.SantosI.TowlerJ.BurtD.YoungA. (2013).
Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition,
127, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001
40.
TalamasS. N.MavorK. I.AxelssonJ.SundelinT.PerrettD. I. (2016).
Eyelid-openness and mouth curvature influence perceived intelligence beyond attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
145, 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000152
41.
TiddemanB. P.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2001).
Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,
21, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.946630
TodorovA.BaronS. G.OosterhofN. N. (2008).
Evaluating face trustworthiness: A model based approach. Social Cognition and Affective Neuroscience,
3, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn009
44.
TodorovA.DuchaineB. (2008).
Reading trustworthiness in faces without recognizing faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology,
25, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290802044996
45.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA.GorenA.HallC. (2005).
Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science,
308, 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589
46.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015).
Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology,
66, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
47.
TodorovA.PakrashiM.OosterhofN. N. (2009).
Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition,
27, 813–833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
48.
TognettiA.BerticatC.RaymondM.FaurieC. (2013).
Is cooperativeness readable in static facial features? An inter-cultural approach. Evolution and Human Behavior,
34, 427–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.002
49.
ToscanoH.SchubertT. W.GiessnerS. R. (2018).
Eye gaze and head posture jointly influence judgments of dominance, physical strength, and anger. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
42, 285–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-018-0276-5
50.
TracyJ.MatsumotoD. (2008).
The spontaneous expression of pride and shame: Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
105, 11655–11660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802686105
51.
WallbottH. G. (1998).
Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology,
28, 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<879::AID-EJSP901>3.0.CO;2-W
WiggersM. (1982).
Judgments of facial expressions of emotion predicted from facial behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
7, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986872
WinstonJ. S.StrangeB. A.O’DohertyJ.DolanR. J. (2002).
Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience,
5, 277–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn816
57.
WitkowerZ.TracyJ. L. (2018).
Bodily communication of emotion: Evidence for extrafacial behavioral expressions and available coding systems. Emotion Review,
11, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917749880
58.
XuF.WuD.ToriyamaR.MaF.ItakuraS.LeeK. (2012).
Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults’ use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments. PLoS One,
7, e34859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034859
59.
YoungS. G.SlepianM. L.SaccoD. F. (2015).
Sensitivity to perceived facial trustworthiness is increased by activating self-protection motives. Social Psychological and Personality Science,
6, 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615573329
60.
ZebrowitzL. A. (1996). Physical appearance as a basis for stereotyping. In MacraeC. N.StangorC.HewstoneM. (Eds.) Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 79–120).
Guildford Press.
61.
ZebrowitzL. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
62.
ZebrowitzL. A.VoinescuL.CollinsM. A. (1996).
“Wide-eyed” and “crooked-faced”: Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
22, 1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
