We investigated artificial scotomas created when a moving object instantaneously crossed a gap, jumping ahead and continuing its otherwise smooth motion. Gaps of up to 5.1 degrees of visual angle, presented at 18° eccentricity, either closed completely or appeared much shorter than when the same gap was crossed by two-point apparent motion, or crossed more slowly, mimicking occlusion. Prolonged exposure to motion trajectories with a gap in most cases led to further shrinking of the gap. The same gap-shrinking effect has previously been observed in touch. In both sensory modalities, it implicates facilitation among codirectional local motion detectors and motion neurons with receptive fields larger than the gap. Unlike stimuli that simply deprive a receptor surface of input, suggesting it is insentient, our motion pattern skips a section in a manner that suggests a portion of the receptor surface has been excised, and the remaining portions stitched back together. This makes it a potentially useful tool in the experimental study of plasticity in sensory maps.
BarlowH. B.FöldiákP. (1989).
Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex. In DurbinR.MiallC.MitchisonG. (Eds.), The computing neuron (pp. 54–72).
Wokingham, England:
Addison-Wesley.
2.
BattagliniL.CampanaG.CascoC. (2013).
Illusory speed is retained in memory during invisible motion.i-Perception,
4, 180–191. doi:10.1068/i0562
3.
BoringE. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology.
New York, NY:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BuonomanoD. V.MerzenichM. M. (1998).
Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps.Annual Review of Neuroscience,
21, 149–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149
5.
Bosco, G, Delle Monache, S., Gravano, S., Indovina, I., La Scaleia, B., Maffei, V., Zago, M. & Lacquaniti, F. (2015). Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9 February, pp.1 –17.
CavanaghP.AnstisS. (2013).
The flash grab effect.Vision Research,
91, 8–20. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.007
8.
ChunM. M.CavanaghP. (1997).
Seeing two as one : Linking apparent motion and repetition blindness.Psychological Science,
8, 74–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00686.x
9.
DetorakisG. I.RougierN. P. (2012).
A neural field model of the somatosensory cortex: Formation, maintenance and reorganization of ordered topographic maps. PLoS One,
7, e40257. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040257
10.
De WeerdP. (2006).
Perceptual filling-in: More than the eye can see.Progress in Brain Research,
154, 227–245.
11.
De WeerdP.GatassR.DesimoneR.UngerleiderL. (1995).
Responses of cells in monkey visual cortex during perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma.Nature,
377, 731–734.
12.
EaglemanD. M.SejnowskiT. J. (2007).
Motion signals bias localization judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump and Frohlich illusions. Neurobiology,
7, 1–12. doi:10.1167/7.4.3.
13.
GeldardF.SherrickC. E. (1972).
The cutaneous “rabbit”: A perceptual illusion.Science,
178, 178–179.
14.
GeldardF. A. (1975). Sensory saltation: Metastability in the perceptual world.
Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
GeldardF. A. (1976).
The saltatory effect in vision.Sensory Processes,
1, 77–86.
GoldreichD.TongJ. (2013).
Prediction, postdiction, and perceptual length contraction: A Bayesian low-speed prior captures the cutaneous rabbit and related illusions. Frontiers in Psychology,
4, 221.
18.
HiramotoM.ClineH. T. (2014).
Optic flow instructs retinotopic map formation through a spatial to temporal to spatial transformation of visual information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
111, E5105–E5113.
KanekoS.KajimotoH.HaywardV. (2018). A case of perceptual completion in spatio-temporal tactile space. In PrattichizzoD.ShinodaH.TanH.RuffaldiE.FrisoliA. (Eds.), International Conference on Haptics: Science, technology, and applications (pp. 49–57).
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
21.
KapadiaM.GilbertD.WestheimerG. (1994).
Measure for short-term cortical plasticity in human vision.The Journal of Neuroscience,
14, 451–457.
22.
KawachiY.KawabeT.GyobaJ. (2011).
Stream/bounce event perception reveals a temporal limit of motion correspondence based on surface feature over space and time.i-Perception,
2, 428–439. doi:10.1068/i0399
23.
KilgardM. P.MerzenichM. (1995).
Anticipated stimuli across skin.Nature,
373, 663. doi:10.1038/373663a0
24.
Kirkby, L. A., Sack, G. S., Firl, A. & Feller, M. B. (2013). A role for correlated spontaneous activity in the assembly of neural circuits. Neuron, 80(5), 1129–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.030.
25.
KoenderinkJ. J. (1990).
The brain a geometry engine.Psychological Research,
52, 122–127. doi:10.1007/BF00877519
26.
KohlerP. J.CavanaghP.TseP. U. (2015).
Motion-induced position shifts are influenced by global motion, but dominated by component motion.Vision Research,
110, 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.003
27.
Lotze, H. (1852) Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann.
28.
MakinA. D. J. (2017).
The common rate control account of prediction motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
25, 1784–1797. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1403-8
29.
MaloneyL. T.AhumadaA. J. (1989).
Learning by assertion: Two methods for calibrating a linear visual system.Neural Computation,
1, 392–401.
30.
MausG. W.WhitneyD. (2016).
Motion-dependent filling-in of spatiotemporal information at the blind spot. PLoS One,
11, 1–14.
31.
MerzenichM. M.JenkinsW. M. (1993).
Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience.Journal of Hand Therapy,
6, 89–104. doi:10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80290-0
32.
NakajimaY.SakaguchiY.LivingstoneM. S.HubelD. H.LivingstoneM. S.HubelD. H.SakaguchiY. (2016).
Perceptual shrinkage of a one-way motion path with high-speed motion. Scientific Reports,
6, 30592. doi:10.1038/srep30592
33.
NewJ. J.SchollB. J. (2008).
“Perceptual scotomas”: A functional account of motion-induced blindness: Research article.Psychological Science,
19, 653–659. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02139.x
34.
NguyenE. H. L.TaylorJ. L.BrooksJ.Seizova-CajicT. (2016).
Velocity of motion across the skin influences perception of tactile location.Journal of Neurophysiology,
115, 674–684. doi:10.1152/jn.00707.2015
35.
PessoaL.De WeerdP. (2003). Filling in: From perceptual completion to cortical reorganization.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
36.
PessoaL.ThompsonE.NoëA. (1998).
Finding out about filling-in : A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
21, 723–802.
37.
RamachandranV. S.GregoryR. L. (1991).
Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision.Nature,
350, 699–702. doi:10.1038/350699a0
38.
Seizova-CajicT.TaylorJ. L. (2014).
Somatosensory space abridged: Rapid change in tactile localization using a motion stimulus. PLoS One,
9, e90892. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090892
39.
SheridanP. (2015).
Long-range cortical connections give rise to a robust velocity map of V1.Neural Networks,
71, 124–141. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2015.08.005
40.
SpillmannL.Dresp-LangleyB.TsengC. (2015).
Beyond the classical receptive field : The effect of contextual stimuli.Journal of Vision,
15(9), 1–23. doi:10.1167/15.9.7.doi
41.
SpillmannL.OtteT.HamburgerK.MagnussenS. (2006).
Perceptual filling-in from the edge of the blind spot.Vision Research,
46, 4252–4257. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.033
42.
TodorovićD. (2011).
What is the origin of the gestalt principles?Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies,
17, 1–20.
43.
TrojanJ.StolleA. M.Mrsic CarlA.KleinbohlD.HongZ. T.HolzlR. (2010).
Spatiotemporal integration in somatosensory perception: Effects of sensory saltation on pointing at perceived positions on the body surface. Frontiers in Psychology,
1, 206.
44.
WertheimerM. (1923/1958). Principles of perceptual organization. In BeardsleeD.WertheimerM. (Ed.), Readings in perception (pp. 115–135). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. Translated from German by M. Wertheimer (originally published in 1923).
45.
WestB. T.WelchK. B.GaleckiA. T. (2015). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software (2nd ed.).
Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press.
46.
WhitneyD. (2002).
The influence of visual motion on perceived position.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
6, 211–216.
47.
WhitselB. L.FranzenO.DreyerD.HollinsM.YoungM.EssickG. K.WongC. (1986).
Dependence of subjective traverse length on velocity of moving tactile stimuli.Somatosensory Research,
3, 185–196.
48.
Watamaniuk, S.N.J., McKee, S.P. & Grzywacz, N.M. (1995). Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise. Vision Research, 35(1), 65–77.
49.
YantisS.NakamaT. (1998).
Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion.Nature Neuroscience,
1, 508–512. doi:10.1038/2226
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
