The study aimed to explore processing difference between a literal phrase and a metaphoric one. Unlike artificially created stimuli in most experimental research, an artistic text with an ambiguous binary metaphoric phrase was used. Eye tracking methodology was applied. Results suggested difference between the two types of phrases in both early and late processing measures.
CacciariC.TabossiP. (1988) The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language27: 668–683.
2.
GibbsR. W. (1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science8: 275–304.
3.
GioraR. (2003) On our mind. Salience, context, and figurative language, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
HarmsD. (2000) Sobranie sochinenij: v 3 t [A collection of writings: in 3 volumes]. t.2 [v.2], Novaya Aviatsia. SPb: Azbuka [New Aviation. Saint-Petersburg: The ABC], pp. 55.
5.
PickeringM. J.FrissonS. (2001) Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition27: 556.
6.
RaynerK. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin124: 372.
7.
SerenoS. C.PachtJ. M.RaynerK. (1992) The effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Psychological Science3: 296–300.
8.
StaubA.RaynerK. (2007) Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In: GaskellG. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 327–342.
9.
TynyanovY. (1924/2007) Problema stihotvornogo yazyka [The problem of poetic language], Izd. 4e, M: KomKniga [4th edition, Moscow: KomBook].
