Eye-tracking technology and gaze-contingent control in human–computer interaction have become an objective reality. This article reports on a series of eye-tracking experiments, in which we concentrated on one aspect of gaze–contingent interaction: Its effectiveness compared with mouse-based control in a computer strategy game. We propose a measure for evaluating the effectiveness of interaction based on “the time of recognition” the game unit. In this article, we use this measure to compare gaze- and mouse-contingent systems, and we present the analysis of the differences as a function of the number of game units. Our results indicate that performance of gaze–contingent interaction is typically higher than mouse manipulation in a visual searching task. When tested on 60 subjects, the results showed that the effectiveness of gaze-contingent systems over 1.5 times higher. In addition, we obtained that eye behavior stays quite stabile with or without mouse interaction.
BarabanschikovV.MiladM. (1994) Metody okulografii v issledovanii poznavatelnyh processov i deyatelnosti [Oculography methods in the study of cognitive processes and activities], Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Psychology.
2.
BarabanschikovV.ZhegalloA. (2010) Metody registracii dvizhenij glaz teoriya i praktika [Eye-Tracking Methods: Theory and Practice]. Psychological Science and Education5: 240–254.
3.
Bieg, H.-J., Chuang, L. L., Fleming, R. W., Reiterer, H., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2010). Eye and pointer coordination in search and selection tasks. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications—ETRA ’10, (p. 89). New York, NY: ACM Press.
4.
BodrovV. A. (2000) Informacionnyj stress [Informational Stress], Moscow: ПЕР СЭ.
5.
ChenM. C.AndersonJ. R.SohnM. H. (2001) What can a mouse cursor tell us more? Correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In: Beaudouin-LafonM.JacobR. J. K. (eds) CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 281–282.
GippenreiterY. B. (1978) Dvizheniya chelovecheskogo glaza [Movements of the human eye], Moscow: Publishing house of the Moscow State University.
8.
Gowases, T., Bednarik, R., & Tukiainen, M. (2008). Gaze vs. mouse in games: The effects on user experience. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2008) (pp. 773–778).
9.
IsokoskiP.JoosM.SpakovO.MartinB. (2009) Gaze controlled games. Universal Access in the Information Society8: 323–337.
10.
JacobR. J. K. (1990) What you look at is what you get: Eye movement-based interaction techniques. In: CarrascoJ.WhitesideJ. (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Empowering People – CHI ’01, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 11–18.
11.
JacobR. J. K. (1991) The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems9: 152–169.
12.
KumarM.WinogradT. (2007) GUIDe: Gaze-enhanced UI design. In: RavinB.MyersB. A.IshiiH.LandayJ. A.ZhaiS. (eds) CHI EA ’07 CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1977–1982.
13.
LawB.AtkinsM. S.LomaxA. J.MackenzieC. L. (2004) Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment. In: DuchowskiA. T.VertegaalR. (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & ApplicationsVol. 1, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 41–48.
14.
LeontievA. (1965) Problemy razvitiya psihiki [Problems of evolution of the mind], Moscow: АПН РСФСР.
15.
McNamaraA.ManiaK.GutierrezD. (2011) Perception in graphics, visualization, virtual environments and animation. In: SanderP. V. (ed.) SIGGRAPH Asia 2011 Courses, Hong Kong, China. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 17:1–17:137.
16.
MajarantaP.AulaA.RäihäK. (2004) Effects of feedback on eye typing with a short dwell time. In: DuchowskiA. T.VertegaalR. (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & ApplicationsVol. 1, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 139–146.
17.
MerchantJ. (1968) Oculometer for “hands-off” pointing and tracking. Space/Aeronautics49: 92–95.
18.
QuekF. K. (1995) Eyes in the interface. Image and Vision Computing13: 511–525.
19.
SibertL. E.JacobR. J. K. (2000) Evaluation of eye gaze interaction. In: TurnerT.SzwillusG.CzerwinskiM.PeternoF.PembertonS. (eds) CHI ’00 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 281–288.
20.
SmithB. A.HoJ.ArkW.ZhaiS. (2000) Hand eye coordination patterns in target selection. In: DuchowskiA. T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 117–122.
21.
SundstedtV.StavrakisE.WummerM.ReinhardE. (2008) A psychophysical study of fixation behavior in a computer game. In: Creem-RegehrS.MyszkowskiK. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and VisualizationVol. 1, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 43–50.
22.
YarbusA. L. (1965) Rol dvizhenij glaz v processe zreniya [Eye movements and vision], Moscow: Science.
