Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Data regarding the role of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack are limited. This study aimed to systematically review and analyze the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy compared with aspirin alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 2024 and identified randomized controlled trials comparing dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone in patients with stroke. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the main outcomes to weigh the risks of type I and type II errors.

Results

Five studies involving 27,563 patients were included. Dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (risk ratio: 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.68–0.81) and major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.71–0.84). However, it was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent hemorrhagic stroke (risk ratio: 2.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.09–4.17) and bleeding (risk ratio: 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.48–3.32). Trial sequential analysis revealed that sufficient evidence for recurrent ischemic stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, and bleeding was achieved.

Conclusion

Dual antiplatelet therapy demonstrated a lower incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone. However, further studies are warranted to provide sufficient evidence regarding recurrent hemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality.

Keywords

Dual antiplatelet therapy stroke transient ischemic attack meta-analysis trial sequential analysis

Introduction

Ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with the World Stroke Organization reporting that one in four adults aged over 25 years will experience a stroke. According to the American Stroke Association, ischemic stroke is a critical condition in which a blocked blood vessel leads to brain cell death due to a lack of oxygen and nutrients. Conversely, although TIA involves a temporary blockage without permanent damage, it is associated with a high risk of imminent stroke, emphasizing the urgent need for treatment within the first 48 h.¹ These conditions can arise from various causes, including atherosclerotic, cardiogenic, lacunar, cryptogenic, and hemorrhagic mechanisms,² along with modifiable (such as diet, hypertension, and smoking) and unmodifiable (such as age and genetics) risk factors.^1,3

Pathophysiologically, vessel occlusion leads to rapid cell death in the ischemic core, whereas the surrounding penumbra, which may still harbor salvageable cells, undergoes neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and processes leading to apoptosis or autophagy.^4,5 The substantial burden of ischemic stroke and TIA greatly impacts the quality of life of patients, thus placing considerable strain on the healthcare system.

Recurrent stroke poses a high risk of severe outcomes, highlighting the need for effective secondary prevention. In this regard, antiplatelet therapy is of paramount importance. Agents such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor inhibit platelet aggregation, thereby reducing the likelihood of ischemic events.⁶ Evidence from the International Stroke Trial (IST) and the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CAST) supports the use of aspirin within 48 h of onset,^7–9 whereas recent trials, such as CHANCE and POINT, emphasize the benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing stroke recurrence.^10,11 However, the increased bleeding risk associated with DAPT is attributed to its widespread use.¹²

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAPT in secondary stroke prevention through a robust statistical analysis of current randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence, focusing on recurrent ischemic strokes, major bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. Moreover, subgroup analyses of age, sex, comorbidities, and therapy timing and duration were conducted to assess the impact of DAPT, aiming to guide clinical practice and inform guidelines for personalized treatment approaches, thus enhancing therapeutic success and minimizing side effects.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).¹³ As our study is a systematic review, ethical approval or permission was not needed. However, we registered the study protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024587084).

Data sources and search strategy

A comprehensive systematic literature search of Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase was performed from inception until 15 August 2024. The search was conducted without specific limitations on criteria. Details of the search strategy are reported in Table S1.

Eligibility criteria

We utilized the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) framework to include studies based on the following inclusion criteria: (a) the population included patients with acute ischemic stroke (minor or mild) or TIA; (b) the intervention was DAPT; (c) the comparator was the use of aspirin alone; and (d) the outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, recurrent hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, and bleeding. Regarding the study design, clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Observational studies, review articles, animal trials, letters to editors, commentaries, editorials, case reports, conference abstracts, studies with overlapping data, and in vitro studies were excluded from the analysis.

Study selection

The articles obtained through the systematic search were uploaded to EndNote Reference Library, where duplicates were identified and removed. After removal of duplicates, the titles and abstracts of the searched articles were uploaded to the Rayyan website and screened for relevance by two authors (S.A. and Z.B.).¹⁴ Potentially eligible studies were then retrieved for full-text screening. The final list of included studies was determined through discussion and consensus among all authors. Disagreement among authors was resolved by a senior author (R.O.). The reference lists of the retrieved studies were manually screened for any additional eligible studies.

Data extraction

Data extraction forms were created using Excel Sheets (Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Excel, United States). The data were extracted separately by three authors (Z.B., M.H., and O.J.), and any differences among authors were resolved by a senior author (R.O). For each study, the following information was extracted: (a) year; (b) country; (c) study design; (d) number of patients in each group; (e) DAPT and aspirin doses; (f) time of treatment initiation; and (g) conclusion. Baseline characteristics of the patients, including sex, age, smoking history, hypertension, diabetes, history of ischemia or myocardial infarction, and history of stroke or TIA, were extracted. We extracted the efficacy and available safety outcomes; primary safety outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, recurrent hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related death, MACE, myocardial infarction, and bleeding.

Risk of bias and certainty of evidence

Two authors (M.O. and B.B.K.) assessed the RCTs’ quality according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment tool.¹⁵ The following items were assessed: (a) randomization process; (b) deviation from intended interventions; (c) missing outcome data; (d) measurement of the outcome and patients; (e) selection of reported bias; and (f) overall bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) scale was used to evaluate the strength and level of evidence for recommendations and was stratified into the following four categories:¹⁶ (a) high quality, indicating no further research is needed and that further research is unlikely to change the confidence of the effects estimation; (b) moderate quality, indicating that more studies can affect the confidence of the effects estimation; (c) low quality, indicating further research is likely to have a critical impact on the confidence of the effects estimation; and (d) very low quality, indicating uncertainty about the effects estimation.

Statistical analysis

We used RStudio software (Public Benefit Corporation (PBC), United States) version 4.3.2 for statistical analyses.¹⁷ To compare dichotomous outcomes, we used risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the inverse variance (IV) method and random effect. P-values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Absolute effect size was calculated using the difference in the event rates between the DAPT and aspirin alone groups. To assess statistical heterogeneity, we used the inconsistency test (I²), and the heterogeneity was considered significant when the I² statistic exceeded 50% or had a P-value of <0.10. For trial sequential analysis (TSA), we comprehensively assessed the magnitude of effect sizes rather than relying on binary outcome significance. TSA was performed using TSA software version 0.9.5.10 Beta (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark). Detailed guidelines for the software are available in the user manual.¹⁸ We estimated the required sample size for the meta-analysis with a power of 80% and a two-sided type I error rate of 5%, employing the O’Brien-Fleming α-spending function. For the superiority analysis, a definitive outcome was confirmed when the cumulative Z-curve crossed the superiority boundary. The risk difference in each outcome between the DAPT and aspirin alone groups was assumed to follow the specified values, and the minimum sample size was calculated to ensure that the Z-curve crossed the superiority boundary.

Results

Search results

We obtained 2278 studies from 4 electronic databases. Using EndNote software, 1296 duplicate studies were removed, and 982 studies remained. After screening by titles and abstracts, 977 studies were excluded. We evaluated the full texts of the remaining five studies for eligibility. Finally, five papers^{10,11,19–21} were included in our meta-analysis. The study selection process is shown in Figure S1.

Summary of the included studies

Five RCTs involving a total of 27,563 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Three of the included studies were published before 2020,^10,11,20 and two were published after 2020.^19,21 Two of the included studies were conducted in China,^10,19 two in a multinational population,^11,21 and one in the northern United States.²⁰ All studies were double-blinded RCTs. The treatment group was administered aspirin and clopidogrel in four studies,^10,11,19,20 whereas the treatment group in the fifth study included aspirin and ticagrelor.²¹ The control group was constant (aspirin alone) in all studies. Participants in two of the included studies received antiplatelet therapy for 90 days,^11,20 those in another two studies received it for 21 days,^10,19 and those in one study received it for 30 days.²¹ Antiplatelet therapy was initiated within 24 h in three studies,^10,20,21 within 12 h in one study,¹¹ and within 72 h in one study.¹⁹ The duration of follow-up was 90 days in four studies^10,11,19,20 and 30 days in the fifth study.²¹ The characteristics of all included studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Trial	FASTER	CHANCE	POINT	THALES	INSPIRES
Year	2007	2013	2018	2020	2023
Country	United States	China	Multinational	Multinational	China
Study design	Double-blind randomized controlled trial	Double-blind randomized controlled trial	Double-blind randomized controlled trial	Double-blind randomized controlled trial	Double-blind randomized controlled trial
No. of patients	396	5170	4881	11,016	6100
Treatment group	Aspirin + clopidogrel	Aspirin + clopidogrel	Aspirin + clopidogrel	Aspirin + ticagrelor	Aspirin + clopidogrel
DAPT dose	Aspirin: loading dose of 162 mg, followed by81 mg/d;clopidogrel: loading dose of 300 mg, followed by 75 mg/d	Aspirin: 75 mg/d for 21 d; clopidogrel: loading dose of 300 mg, followed by 75 mg/d	Aspirin: 162 mg/d for 5 d, followed by 81 mg/d;clopidogrel: loading dose of 600 mg, followed by 75 mg/d	Aspirin: loading dose of 325 or 300 mg, followed by 75–100 mg/d;ticagrelor: loading dose of 180 mg, followed by 90 mg twice a day	Clopidogrel: 300 mg on day 1, followed by 75 mg/d from day 2 to day 90;alongside aspirin: 100–300 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg/d from day 2 to day 21
Comparison group	Aspirin alone	Aspirin alone	Aspirin alone	Aspirin alone	Aspirin alone
Aspirin dose	loading dose of 162 mg, followed by 81 mg/d	75 mg/d for 90 d	162 mg/d for 5 d, followed by 81 mg/d	loading dose of 325 or 300 mg, followed by 75–100 mg/d	100–300 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg/d from day 2
Duration of antiplatelet therapy	90 d	21 d	90 d	30 d	21 d
Initiation of antiplatelet therapy	Within 24 h	Within 24 h	Within 12 h	Within 24 h	Within 72 h
Duration of follow-up	90 d	90 d	90 d	30 d	90 d
Aim	To assess, in a factorial design, whether clopidogrel and simvastatin, if started within 24 h of symptom onset and continued for 90 days, would reduce the risk of stroke after TIA or minor stroke	To assess if combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin provides greater protection against subsequent stroke than aspirin alone	To test the combination (aspirin + clopidogrel) in an international population	To assess the effect of the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin on the prevention of stroke	To study the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone administered within 72 h after the onset of acute cerebral ischemia from atherosclerosis
Conclusion	Immediately after TIA or minor stroke, patients are at high risk of stroke, which might be reduced by using clopidogrel in addition to aspirin. The hemorrhagic risks of the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel do not seem to offset this potential benefit.	Among patients with TIA or minor stroke who can be treated within 24 h after the onset of symptoms, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is superior to aspirin alone for reducing the risk of stroke within the first 90 days and does not increase the risk of hemorrhage.	In patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, those who received a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin had a lower risk of major ischemic events but a higher risk of major hemorrhage at 90 days than those who received aspirin alone.	Among patients with a mild-to-moderate acute non cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≤5) or TIA who were not undergoing intravenous or endovascular thrombolysis, the risk of the composite of stroke or death within 30 days was lower with ticagrelor–aspirin than with aspirin alone, but the incidence of disability did not differ significantly between the two groups. Severe bleeding was more frequent with ticagrelor.	Among patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause, combined clopidogrel–aspirin therapy initiated within 72 h after stroke onset led to a lower risk of new stroke at 90 days than aspirin therapy alone but was associated with a low but higher risk of moderate-to-severe bleeding.

DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; TIA: transient ischemic attack; NIHSS: NIH Stroke Scale

The patient age ranged from 63 to 68 years in the DAPT group and from 62.0 to 68.2 years in the aspirin alone group. The proportions of females in the DAPT and aspirin alone groups were 33.0%–42.5% and 34.7%–50.0%, respectively. Comorbidities included hypertension (DAPT group: 46.0%–77.8%, aspirin alone group: 53.0%–76.9%) and diabetes (DAPT group: 12.0%–28.8%, aspirin alone group: 9.0%–28.3%). The proportions of patients with a history of current or previous smoking ranged from 27% to 43.2% in the DAPT group and from 24.0% to 42.7% in the aspirin alone group. The proportions of patients with myocardial infarction/ischemia ranged from 1.7% to 10.6% in the DAPT group and from 2.0% to 9.8% in the aspirin alone group. The detailed characteristics of the included patients are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included patients.

Trial	FASTER	CHANCE	POINT	THALES	INSPIRES
Year	2007	2013	2018	2020	2023
No. of patients	396	5170	4881	11,016	6100
Median age (years)	DAPT = 68Aspirin alone = 68.2	DAPT = 63 Aspirin alone = 62	DAPT = 65.0 Aspirin alone = 65.0	DAPT = 65.2 (mean)Aspirin alone = 65.1 (mean)	DAPT = 65 Aspirin alone = 65
Proportion of females (%)	DAPT = 42.5Aspirin alone = 50	DAPT = 33Aspirin alone = 34.7	DAPT = 45.1Aspirin alone = 34.7	DAPT = 38.2Aspirin alone = 39.5	DAPT = 34.9Aspirin alone = 36.8
Proportion of patients with hypertension (%)	DAPT = 46Aspirin alone = 53	DAPT = 66.4Aspirin alone = 65.1	DAPT = 69.9Aspirin alone = 68.9	DAPT = 77.8Aspirin alone = 76.9	DAPT = 67.1Aspirin alone = 66.8
Proportion of patients with diabetes (%)	DAPT = 12Aspirin alone = 9	DAPT = 21.3Aspirin alone = 21	DAPT = 28Aspirin alone = 27.1	DAPT = 28.8Aspirin alone = 28.3	DAPT = 27.2Aspirin alone = 27.1
Proportion of patients with current or previous smoking (%)	DAPT = 27Aspirin alone = 24	DAPT = 43.2Aspirin alone = 42.7	DAPT = 20.4Aspirin alone = 20.8	DAPT = 27.2Aspirin alone = 26	DAPT = 29.2Aspirin alone = 29.2
Proportion of patients with myocardial infarction/ischemia (%)	DAPT = 5.5Aspirin alone = 4	DAPT = 1.7Aspirin alone = 2	DAPT = 10.6Aspirin alone = 9.8	–	DAPT = 1.7Aspirin alone = 2
Proportion of patients with previous stroke/TIA (%)	DAPT = stroke: 6,TIA: 16Aspirin alone = stroke: 8.5,TIA: 15.5	DAPT = stroke: 20,TIA: 3.6Aspirin alone = stroke: 20,TIA: 3.1	DAPT = stroke: 56.6,TIA: 43.4Aspirin alone = stroke: 57,TIA: 43	DAPT = stroke: 91.1,TIA: 8.9Aspirin alone = stroke: 90.2,TIA: 9.8	DAPT = stroke: 1.6Aspirin alone = stroke: 1.6

DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; TIA: transient ischemic attack

Quality assessment and GRADE summary

ROB-2 quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included RCTs. Four of the five included studies had a low risk of bias.^10,11,19,21 Only one study²⁰ had a moderate risk of bias. This concern was due to issues identified in the second domain, specifically due to deviations from the intended intervention. The details of the quality assessment are reported in Figure S2. We conducted GRADE assessment of the main outcomes such as recurrent ischemic stroke, recurrent hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, MACE, and bleeding. The findings of the GRADE assessment are summarized in Table S2.

Outcomes

Recurrent stroke

All studies reported the recurrence of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke).^{10,11,19–21} Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70–0.83, P < 0.01) indicated that DAPT significantly reduced the risk of stroke recurrence. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%) (Figure 1(a)). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the type of stroke; all studies reported the recurrence of ischemic stroke.^{10,11,19–21} Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68–0.81, P < 0.01) indicated that DAPT significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%) (Figure 1(b)). Recurrence of hemorrhagic stroke was reported in all RCTs. ^{10,11,19–21} The pooled RR of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.09–4.17, P = 0.03) indicated that DAPT was significantly associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke recurrence. Low heterogeneity was detected between the studies (I² = 7%) (Figure 1(c)).

Figure 1.

Pooled meta-analysis for (a) recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic); (b) ischemic stroke; and (c) hemorrhagic stroke.

We conducted a TSA of the five trials assessing the recurrence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with an overall sample size of 27,563. For hemorrhagic stroke, the required sample size was 28,925 patients, and the cumulative Z-line crossed the conventional and superiority boundaries, favoring the use of aspirin alone; however, the overall sample size was less than that required for achieving a definitive result despite the statistically significant pooled effect (Figure 2(a)). For ischemic stroke, the required sample size was 5043, and the final point on the cumulative Z-line crossed the conventional and superiority boundaries, favoring the use of DAPT; the sample size surpassed the required sample size, thus indicating sufficient evidence (true positive) (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 2.

Trial sequential analysis of dual antiplatelet therapy and aspirin alone using 80% power and 5% significance: (a) recurrent hemorrhagic stroke; (b) recurrent ischemic stroke; (c) all-cause mortality; (d) major adverse cardiovascular events and (e) bleeding.

All-cause mortality

Four studies reported the all-cause mortality outcome^10,11,19,21 (Figure 3(a)). Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.95–1.71, P = 0.1) indicated no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%). We conducted a TSA of the four trials assessing all-cause mortality. The required sample size was 80,408 patients, and the number of patients in the 4 included studies was 27,167. The cumulative Z-line did not cross the conventional or superiority boundaries, and the final point was not within the inner boundary, suggesting a lack of evidence to confirm the negative result (insignificance) and indicating the possibility of a false negative (Figure 2(c)).

Figure 3.

Pooled meta-analysis of (a) all-cause mortality; (b) cardiovascular-related death; and (c) major adverse cardiovascular events.

Cardiovascular-related death

Three studies reported cardiovascular death^19,11,10 (Figure 3(b)). Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 1.38 (95% CI: 0.81–2.33, P = 0.23) indicated no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%).

MACE

All studies reported MACE^{10–11,19–21} (Figure 3(c)). Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71–0.84, P < 0.01) indicated that DAPT significantly reduced the risk of MACE. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%). TSA suggested that a required sample size of 6215. The final point on the cumulative Z-line crossed the conventional and superiority boundaries, favoring DAPT with an overall sample size (27,563) greater than that required for a definitive result; thus, the evidence was considered sufficient (true positive) (Figure 2(d)).

Moderate-to-severe bleeding

All studies reported bleeding events^{10–11,19–21} (Figure 4(a)). Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 2.21 (95% CI: 1.48–3.32, P < 0.01) indicated that DAPT significantly increased the risk of bleeding events. Low heterogeneity was detected between the studies (I² = 29%). TSA suggested that a sample size of 14,902 was required. The final point on the cumulative Z-line crossed the conventional and superiority boundaries, favoring aspirin alone, and the overall sample size of 27,561 was greater than that required for sufficient and definitive evidence (true positive) (Figure 2(e)).

Figure 4.

Pooled meta-analysis of (a) moderate-to-severe bleeding and (b) myocardial infarction.

Myocardial infarction

Four studies reported myocardial infarction^19,11,10,21 (Figure 4(b)). Upon comparison between DAPT and aspirin alone, the pooled RR of 1.63 (95% CI: 0.77–3.46, P = 0.2) indicated no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (I² = 0%).

Discussion

DAPT reduces ischemic events during stroke management by inhibiting platelet aggregation via cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 suppression and P2Y12 receptor obstruction. This combination is crucial for preventing thrombosis in patients with minor strokes or those with TIA. Additionally, DAPT attenuates inflammation via the regulation of cytokines, particularly IL-6, decreases neutrophil infiltration, improves recovery, and diminishes pyroptosis and inflammation-related tissue damage.^22,23 Our findings indicate that DAPT reduces ischemic stroke recurrence. However, the increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke warrants careful patient selection, particularly in patients prone to bleeding or resistance to antiplatelet therapy.

Evidence regarding DAPT for secondary ischemic stroke prevention underscores the importance of short-term DAPT in reducing recurrent ischemic events (e.g. combining aspirin with clopidogrel or other agents). DAPT is especially effective in high-risk patients following minor ischemic stroke or TIA. The READAPT study demonstrated the short-term efficacy of DAPT in real-world settings, reporting a low ischemic recurrence rate (3.3%) and moderate bleeding complication rate (2.7%), despite wider application beyond RCT protocols.²⁴ Long-term DAPT, such as acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole, considerably enhances neurological and cognitive outcomes with good tolerability, reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and severe bleeding.²⁵ A meta-analysis conducted among patients undergoing thrombolysis revealed that DAPT improved their 90-day functional outcomes without increasing intracranial hemorrhage or mortality; however, it did not lower the stroke recurrence rates.²⁶ These findings indicate the benefits of DAPT in secondary stroke prevention, with optimal use varying by patient characteristics such as stroke severity and therapy initiation timing. Our study corroborates these findings, demonstrating that DAPT significantly reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR: 0.74, P < 0.01) without significant heterogeneity and is linked to a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 2.13, P = 0.03).

The CHANCE and POINT trials demonstrated the efficacy of short-term DAPT in reducing recurrent ischemic events within 90 days of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA. The CHANCE trial demonstrated a 32% reduction in stroke recurrence with DAPT compared with aspirin alone, without a significant increase in major bleeding risks, whereas the POINT trial reported a 25% reduction in stroke recurrence or death, with a higher risk of major hemorrhage. The CHANCE-2 trial highlighted that the benefits of DAPT may be less pronounced in patients aged over 80 years with higher bleeding and mortality risks.²⁷ Our study findings align with those of CHANCE and POINT trials, demonstrating that DAPT reduces recurrent ischemic events; however, the increased bleeding risk warrants further consideration, especially in older populations.

Patient demographics substantially influenced the DAPT outcomes in stroke prevention, with factors such as age, comorbidities, and geographical location affecting treatment patterns and adherence. Studies have shown that older patients, particularly those aged over 80 years, experience higher rates of adverse outcomes, such as bleeding, while receiving DAPT. A UK-based study reported that 13.9% of patients did not receive antiplatelet therapy within 90 days of hospitalization for ischemic stroke or TIA. Furthermore, among those who received the therapy, 62.3% switched to single antiplatelet therapy within a year, potentially owing to concerns regarding DAPT-related complications.²⁸ A US-based study revealed that DAPT was less frequently prescribed than single antiplatelet therapy, and patients remained at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days, suggesting that demographic and systemic factors contribute to suboptimal therapy initiation and adherence.²⁹ Our study reported these findings, with subgroup analyses identifying variations in the outcomes based on patient demographics, indicating that DAPT requires adjustments based on age and comorbidities to minimize adverse events while maximizing efficacy.

Risk–benefit analysis of DAPT in post-stroke patients highlights a delicate balance between reducing ischemic stroke recurrence and increasing bleeding risks. DAPT, typically involving aspirin and clopidogrel, effectively improves functional outcomes within 90 days of minor ischemic stroke or TIA. A meta-analysis revealed that DAPT post-intravenous thrombolysis did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality risk while enhancing neurological outcomes.²⁶ However, prolonged DAPT, especially in procedures such as carotid endarterectomy, raises bleeding risks despite slightly lowering the stroke incidence.³⁰ For high-risk patients, the OPT-CAD study indicated that extending DAPT beyond 12 months reduces stroke recurrence without significantly increasing severe bleeding risks, suggesting benefits for well-monitored patients.³¹ Our findings align with this balance. Although DAPT reduces ischemic stroke recurrence, it notably increases moderate-to-severe bleeding risks (RR: 2.21, P < 0.01).

Updated clinical guidelines for DAPT in secondary stroke prevention emphasize optimizing the therapy duration and balancing efficacy with bleeding risk. DAPT, combined with aspirin and clopidogrel, is most effective for short durations (21–30 days) in patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, as demonstrated by several RCTs.^10,19 Prolonged DAPT increases the risk of hemorrhagic events without further reducing the incidence of recurrent strokes, necessitating personalized approaches based on individual bleeding and thrombotic risk. The CHANCE and POINT trials demonstrated that short-term DAPT is more effective than single antiplatelet therapy in preventing early recurrent ischemic events; however, prolonged therapy does not offer additional protection and increases the incidence of bleeding complications.⁶ Our study supports these guidelines, demonstrating that short-term DAPT significantly reduces ischemic stroke recurrence, while extended use may increase bleeding risk, underscoring the need for individualized treatment.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that DAPT significantly reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and MACE compared with aspirin alone. However, the use of DAPT is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke and bleeding events. TSA revealed that sufficient evidence for recurrent ischemic stroke, MACE, and bleeding was achieved. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection while prescribing DAPT, particularly for individuals at high risk of bleeding. Further studies are warranted to provide sufficient evidence regarding recurrent hemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605251337035 - Supplemental material for Dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin alone in acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605251337035 for Dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin alone in acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials by Ramez M Odat, Sakhr Alshwayyat, Zainab I Bahdar, Mohammad Abdelraheem, Basma B Khalefa, Omar Jarah, Mohammad H Obeidat, Mohammad E Bani Khalaf, Aon J Bani Khalaf, Ayham Mohammad Hussein, Jehad A Yasin, Hamdah Hanifa and Hritvik Jain in Journal of International Medical Research

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

None.

Author contributions

R.O., S.A., Z.B., M.A., B.K., H.J., and O.J. developed the concept and designed the systematic review. R.O., M.O., and M.B. contributed to acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. A.K., A.H., H.H, and J.Y. wrote the initial manuscript. All authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Data availability statement

The data generated in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Funding

None.

Supplementary material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

ORCID iDs

Ramez M Odat

Sakhr Alshwayyat

Hamdah Hanifa

References

Panuganti

Tadi

Lui

Transient ischemic attack, StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023.

Silva

Koroshetz

González

, et al. Causes of ischemic stroke. In: Acute ischemic stroke. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 25–42.

Yan

Zhou

, et al. Immune cells after ischemic stroke onset: roles, migration, and target intervention. J Mol Neurosci 2018; 66: 342–355.

Palmer

SJ.

Identification, care and prevention of stroke is possible. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 2023; 17: 236–239.

Salaudeen

Bello

Danraka

, et al. Understanding the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke: the basis of current therapies and opportunity for new ones. Biomolecules 2024; 14: 305.

Shah

Liu

Contemporary antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention: a narrative review of current literature and guidelines. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2022; 7: 406–414.

Buddhavarapu

Kashyap

Surani

Early antiplatelet therapy used for acute ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12: 677–680.

International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19 435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 1997; 349: 1569–1581.

Chen

; CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) Collaborative Group . CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20 000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 1997; 349: 1641–1649.

10.

Wang

Zhao

; CHANCE Investigatorset al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 11–19.

11.

Johnston

Easton

Farrant

; Clinical Research Collaboration, Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network, and the POINT Investigatorset al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 215–225.

12.

Harris

Pouwels

Johnson

, et al. Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27: 1–257.

13.

Page

McKenzie

Bossuyt

, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.

14.

Ouzzani

Hammady

Fedorowicz

, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 210.

15.

Sterne

JAC

Savović

Page

, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898.

16.

Schünemann

Oxman

Brozek

; GRADE Working Groupet al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 2008; 336: 1106–1110.

17.

Balduzzi

Rücker

Schwarzer

How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health 2019; 22: 153–160.

18.

Thorlund

Engstrøm

Wetterslev

, et al. User manual for trial sequential analysis (TSA). 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Trial Unit, 2017, pp. 1–119.

19.

Gao

Chen

Pan

; INSPIRES Investigatorset al. Dual antiplatelet treatment up to 72 hours after ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 2413–2424.

20.

Kennedy

Hill

Ryckborst

; FASTER Investigatorset al. Fast assessment of stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 961–969.

21.

Johnston

Amarenco

Denison

; THALES Investigatorset al. Ticagrelor and aspirin or aspirin alone in acute ischemic stroke or TIA. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 207–217.

22.

Dong

Liu

, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and inhibits inflammation after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Ann Transl Med 2022; 10: 283.

23.

, et al. Synergistic effects and molecular mechanisms of DL-3-n-butylphthalide combined with dual antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 129: 111592.

24.

De Matteis

Ornello

De Santis

, et al. Beyond RCTs: short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Eur Stroke J 2024; 9: 989–999.

25.

Kostenko

Petrova

Eneeva

MA.

Long-term combined antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council 2024; 18: 32–40.

26.

Zeng

Xin

Tang

, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for patients with minor ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 238: 108176.

27.

Zhang

Jing

Wang

, et al. Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the elderly for stroke prevention: a subgroup analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2024; 9: 541–550.

28.

Liu

Jiang

, et al. Antiplatelet treatment patterns and outcomes for secondary stroke prevention in the United Kingdom. Cardiol Ther 2023; 12: 675–687.

29.

O’Brien

Milentijevic

Roychowdhury

, et al. Antiplatelet treatment patterns and outcomes of secondary stroke prevention in the United States. Heliyon 2023; 9: e13579.

30.

Patel

Marmor

Dakour

, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with increased risk of bleeding and decreased risk of stroke following carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 88: 191–198.

31.

Qiu

Wei

, et al. Effect of dual antiplatelet therapy prolongation in acute coronary syndrome patients with both high ischemic and bleeding risk: insight from the OPT-CAD study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10: 1201091.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.50 MB