Efficacy and safety of probiotic-supplemented bismuth quadruple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of probiotics to the bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter pylori would improve the incidence of eradication and reduce that of side effects.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials matching the inclusion criteria were collected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the incidences of eradication rate, side effects as a whole, diarrhea, and other side effects.

Results

Ten studies were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The pooled RRs for the eradication rates in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses of the probiotic group vs. the control group were 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02–1.11) and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00–1.07), respectively. Probiotic supplementation reduced the incidences of side effects (RR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37–0.91), diarrhea (RR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.25–0.67), and bitter taste (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40–0.99).

Conclusions

The results of this meta-analysis support the use of probiotics in combination with BQT in the clinical management of patients with H. pylori infection.

Keywords

probiotic bismuth quadruple therapy eradication side effect meta-analysis diarrhea bitter taste

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a widespread Gram-negative pathogen that causes chronic bacterial infections in humans. It has colonized approximately 50% of the world’s population.¹ The ability of H. pylori to resist gastric acid and to quickly create a pH-neutral environment principally depends on its production of urease, which hydrolyzes urea to produce carbon dioxide and ammonia.² Outer membrane proteins of the bacterium, such as blood group antigen-binding adhesin and sialic acid-binding adhesin, can bind to recognition sites on gastric epithelial cells, providing a basis for long-term colonization.³ Biofilm formation and the antioxidant enzyme system can also help the bacterium achieve colonization.⁴ Various virulence factors, such as cytotoxin-associated gene A protein and vacuolating cytotoxin protein, play a key role in the injury of host tissues and in inducing gastrointestinal disease.⁵

H. pylori infection can induce many gastroduodenal diseases, such as gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.⁶ A study by Shatila and Thomas showed that H. pylori infection can be found in 90% of patients with stomach carcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.⁷ There is also a close relationship between H. pylori infection and duodenal ulceration, which occurs in 80% of cases, and with stomach ulceration, which occurs in up to 80% of cases.⁸ The eradication of H. pylori has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of gastric cancer in all risk groups.^9,10 Therefore, the Kyoto global consensus report on H. pylori gastritis advocates the treatment of all patients with H. pylori infection unless contraindications are present.¹¹

Increasing resistance to antibiotics worldwide has had negative effects on the effectiveness of polypharmacy-based regimens for the eradication of H. pylori infection, according to the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report, which reviewed the potential applications of various empirical polypharmacy-based regimens for H. pylori infection in regions with differing resistance profiles.¹² The classic bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) and a modified BQT are suitable options that are recommended in several guidelines and consensus reports.^12–16 A meta-analysis by Bang et al. showed similar success of eradication for a modified BQT (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid) and the classic BQT (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth subcitrate 300 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg qid) over 14 days in regions with a high level of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance. Both regimens yielded a high incidence of eradication (96.2% vs. 96.9%, respectively).¹⁷ Although both the classic and modified BQT are effective approaches to the eradication of infection, poor tolerance and adverse reactions are common and are frequently reported to result in the discontinuation of BQT.^18–20 Adverse reactions may be attributable to changes in gut microbial diversity/abundance because eradication therapies, such as BQT, can alter the gut microecology.⁶

Regimens with higher incidences of eradication and lower incidences of side effects rate are being researched. Probiotics might improve the incidence of eradication and improve compliance by reducing the incidence of side effects. To date, several trials have shown that certain strains of probiotic may be useful as a complement to eradication therapy.^21,22 Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed the incidences of eradication and side effects associated with probiotic supplementation of BQT.

Methods

Search strategy

This study is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.²³ The registration number is INPLASY202370051 and the related DOI is 10.37766/inplasy2023.7.0051. Trials were identified by systematically searching electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) up to May 2022. The search terms used for PubMed were: (Helicobacter pylori [MeSH Terms] OR Helicobacter pylori [Text Word] OR Helicobacter nemestrinae [Text Word] OR Campylobacter pylori [Text word] OR Campylobacter pylori subsp. pylori [Text word] OR Campylobacter pyloridis [Text word]) AND (probiotics [MeSH Terms] OR probiotics [Text Word] OR probiotic [Text word] OR yeast [Text word] OR yogurt [Text word] OR Lactobacillus [Text word] OR Bifidobacterium [Text word] OR Saccharomyces [Text word] OR Lactococcus [Text word] OR Streptococcus [Text word] OR Enterococcus [Text word]) AND (Bismuth [MeSH Terms] OR Bismuth [Text Word] OR quadruple [Text Word]). A manual search was also performed using the reference lists of the articles identified, all of which were published in English.

Inclusion criteria

The following were used as inclusion criteria. 1) Randomized controlled trial, in which infection with or the eradication of H. pylori was confirmed by at least one generally accepted method (urea breath test (UBT), rapid urea test (RUT), H. pylori culture, histology, or stool antigen test). 2) Comparison of at least two groups, consisting of test patients who underwent BQT in combination with probiotics and control patients who underwent BQT with placebo or no additional intervention. 3) Two types of antibiotics were used during BQT, which were not restricted to metronidazole and tetracycline, meaning that both classic BQT and modified BQT were eligible. 4) The incidence of eradication, with or without adverse effects, was reported. 5) Publication in English. 6) Human studies. 7) Full-text electronic version articles were available.

Because the analysis was based on previously published studies, the requirements for ethics approval and informed consent were waived.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two authors (GY and XF) independently reviewed the study titles and abstracts, and studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were retrieved for full-text assessment. The following data were extracted independently by the two authors from these studies: the total number of participants, the method used to diagnose H. pylori, the time taken for eradication, the treatment regimen for H. pylori, the types of probiotics used, the incidence of eradication, and the number of any side effects.

The assessment of risk of bias was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration²⁴. Random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias were assessed. The two authors categorized each of these as high, low, or unclear risk through discussion.

Statistical analysis

The effects of a combination of a probiotic and BQT on several outcomes were assessed: the incidences of eradication on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, eradication on a per-protocol (PP) basis, side effects as a whole, diarrhea, bitter taste, abdominal discomfort, nausea or vomiting, constipation, melena, rash, fatigue, and dizziness. For all these outcomes, the pooled risk ratio (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model for dichotomous variables and are presented as forest plots. The possibility of publication bias was assessed by constructing a funnel plot if more than 10 studies were included. Begg’s and Egger’s tests were also used to assess funnel plot asymmetry and a P-value <0.1 was accepted as indicating significant publication bias. We also used the Cochran Q and I² tests to assess the magnitude of any heterogeneity. An I² statistic >50% and a P-value <0.1 was taken to indicate the presence of significant heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were not performed because there was no significant heterogeneity among the studies with respect to the primary outcome of the incidence of eradication.

Results

Search results

We initially identified 315 potentially relevant studies, of which 10 (containing data for 1397 participants) were included in the analysis.^25–34 Details of the selection protocol are presented in Figure 1. Nine studies were published between 2013 and 2022,^25,27–34 and the earliest was published in 2004.²⁵ Eight studies were conducted in Asia (four in China, two in Thailand, and two in Iran),^{25,27–29,31–34} and two studies were conducted in Europe (one in Italy and the other in Spain).^25,29 The time taken to eradicate H. pylori was 10 or 14 days. All 10 of the publications included in the meta-analysis reported the H. pylori incidence of eradication.^25–34 Five publications reported the total incidence of side effects,^{26,27,31,32,34} six reported the incidence of diarrhea,^{26–29,32,34} four reported the incidence of bitter taste^28,29,31,34, and a few of the 10 reported other side effects. The general characteristics of the studies are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Flow chart for the study selection.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the included studies.

Reference (location)	Total (Test/Cont)	HP assessment (initial/subsequent)	Time taken for eradication (days)	Treatment regimen	Probiotics used	Incidence of eradication on an ITT basis (Test/Cont)	Incidence of eradication on a PP basis (Test/Cont)
Shafaghi et al. 2016 (Iran)	76 (38/38)	Histology and RUT/14C-UBT	14	Bismuth subcitrate (dose not available) qidOmeprazole 20 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidClarithromycin 500 mg bid	Lactobacillus strains (L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus, and L. bulgaricus), Bifidobacterium strains (B. breve and B. longum), and Streptococcus thermophiles(TVC: 400 million CFU)	92.1%/63.1%	92.1%/100%
Tursi et al. 2004 (Italy)	70 (35/35)	Histology and RUT/Endoscopy or 13C-UBT	10	Ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg bidEsomeprazole or pantoprazole 40 mg qdAmoxycillin 1,000 mg tidTinidazole 500 mg bid	Lactobacillus casei(16 billion viable lyophilized bacteria)	94.3%/85.7%	97.1%/93.8%
Shavakhi et al. 2013 (Iran)	180 (90/90)	RUT or histology/13C-UBT	14	Bismuth subcitrate 240 mg bidOmeprazole 20 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidClarithromycin 500 mg bid	Lactobacillus strains (L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus, and L. bulgaricus), Bifidobacterium strains (B. breve and B. longum), and Streptococcus thermophiles(TVC: 200 million CFU)	76.6%/81.1%	82.1%/84.8%
Srinarong et al. 2014 (Thailand)	50 (25/25)50 (25/25)	HP culture, or two tests (RUT and histology)/13C-UBT	714	Bismuth subsalicylate 1,048 mg bidLansoprazole 30 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidClarithromycin 1,000 mg qd	Lactobacillus strains (L. acidophilus, and L. paracasei) and Bifidobacterium lactis(Each ≥1,000 million CFU)	100%/92%100%/96%	100%/92%100%/96%
Poonyam et al. 2019 (Thailand)	50 (25/25)50 (25/25)	HP culture, or two tests (RUT and histology)/13C-UBT	714	Bismuth subsalicylate 1,048 mg bidDexlansoprazole 60 mg bidMetronidazole 400 mg tidTetracycline 500 mg qid	Lactobacillus reuteri(TVC: 400 million CFU)	68%/72%96%/88%	68%/72%96%/88%
Moreno Marquez et al. 2022 (Spain)	80 (40/40)	13C-UBT or histology or stool antigen test/13C-UBT	10	Bismuth subcitrate potassium 520 mg qidOmeprazole 40 mg bidMetronidazole 375 mg qidTetracycline hydrochloride 375 mg qid	Lactobacillus reuteri(TVC: 200 million CFU)	90%/80%	Not available
Chen et al. 2018 (China)	70 (35/35)	Histology/13C-UBT	14	Colloidal bismuth pectin 400 g bidPantoprazole 40 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidFurazolidone 100 mg bid	Clostridium butyricum(TVC: 3 million CFU)	85.7%/88.6%	96.8%/96.9%
Zhao et al. 2021 (China)	348 (169/179)	UBT/UBT	14	Bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg bidEsomeprazole 20 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidClarithromycin 500 mg bid	Saccharomyces boulardii(TVC: 1,980 million CFU)	85.8%/82.7%	94.2%/89.7%
Tang et al. 2020 (China)	151 (77/74)	RUT and 13C-UBT/13C-UBT	14	Bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg bidEsomeprazole 20 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidFurazolidone 100 mg bid	Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis (1,350 million CFU, and 150 million CFU, respectively)	87%/82.4%	89.3%/84.7%
Jiang et al. 2018 (China)	222 (111/111)	14C-UBT/14C-UBT	14	Colloidal bismuth pectin 200 mg bidLansoprazole 15 mg bidAmoxicillin 1,000 mg bidClarithromycin 500 mg bid	Bifidobacterium(not available)	94.6%/84.7%	94.6%/84.7%

Test, test group; Cont, control group; HP, Helicobacter pylori; UBT, urea breath test; RUT, rapid urease test; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per-protocol; TVC, total viable count; CFU, colony-forming units.

Quality and risk of bias

All 10 RCTs involved adequate randomization and none was stopped early. Four studies were categorized as having a high risk of bias with respect to allocation concealment owing to the lack of a placebo. There was a low risk of bias with respect to performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and with respect to other bias in five, three, nine, seven, and nine studies, respectively. The results of the assessment of the risk of bias is shown in Figure 2a and Figure 2b.

Figure 2.

Risk of bias in the included studies. (a) Graph and (b) risk of bias summary.

Results of the meta-analysis of the incidence of eradication

The pooled RRs for the incidence of eradication in the ITT and PP analyses of the probiotic group vs. the control group were 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02–1.11) (Figure 3a) and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00–1.07) (Figure 3b), respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies in either analysis (I² = 6.00%, P = 0.39 and I² = 0, P = 0.51; respectively).

Figure 3.

Effects of probiotic supplementation on the incidence of eradication on (a) an intention-to-treat basis and (b) a per-protocol basis.

Results of the meta-analysis of the adverse effects as whole

Probiotic supplementation reduced the incidence of adverse effects as a whole, and the pooled RR was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.37–0.91) (Figure 4a). However, there was significant heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 59.00%, P = 0.04).

Figure 4.

Effect of probiotic supplementation on the incidences of (a) side effects as a whole, (b) bitter taste, and (c) diarrhea.

Results of the meta-analysis of bitter taste

Probiotic supplementation reduced the incidence of bitter taste, and the pooled RR was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.40–0.99) (Figure 4b). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 29.00%, P = 0.22).

Results of the meta-analysis of diarrhea

Probiotic supplementation reduced the incidence of diarrhea, and the pooled RR was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25–0.67) (Figure 4c). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 27.00%, P = 0.22).

Results of the meta-analysis of other side effects

Probiotic supplementation did not affect the incidences of abdominal discomfort (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.21–1.74), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.53–1.57), constipation (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.27–1.97), melena (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.86–1.22), rash (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.30–2.42), fatigue (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.33–4.06), or dizziness (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.44–2.27).

Publication bias

Funnel plots were used to assess the potential for publication bias with respect to the incidence of eradication for the ITT and PP analyses. Although slight asymmetry was identified in the plots for both parameters, neither Begg’s test nor Egger’s test revealed significant publication bias regarding the included studies (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Assessment of publication bias for the included studies. Funnel plots for the incidences of eradication on (a) an intention-to-treat basis and (b) a per-protocol basis.

Discussion

A probiotic is defined as a living microbial species that may have a positive effect on the bowel microecology and improve health. Probiotics may be useful for the treatment of H. pylori infection.³⁵ A systematic review by Losurdo et al. yielded an OR of 7.91 for probiotic monotherapy vs. placebo for the eradication of H. pylori (95% CI: 2.97–21.05, P < 0.001). Thus, probiotics alone promote the clearance of H. pylori,³⁶ but at present we can only speculate regarding the mechanism underpinning this beneficial effect. Probiotics may secrete antibacterial substances, such as lactic acid, short-chain fatty acids, hydrogen peroxide, or bacteriocin.³⁷ They may also inhibit colonization by H. pylori by inhibiting adhesion or competing for binding sites.^38,39 In addition, they may strengthen the mucous barrier, thereby inhibiting H. pylori colonization.⁴⁰ Furthermore, probiotics have been shown to reduce the local immune response and suppress the gastric inflammatory response.^41,42 However, probiotic monotherapy is not recommended in the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report.¹² A study by Yuan et al. showed that probiotic supplementation with a mixture of Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus cereus ameliorates the gastric dysbiosis caused by eradication therapy. However, in another study, probiotic monotherapy significantly altered the gastric microbiota and did not reduce the H. pylori population.⁴³ Therefore, more evidence is required regarding the efficacy of probiotics for the therapy of H. pylori.

The Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report recommended that probiotics are used alongside antibiotic-based eradication therapy.¹² The present meta-analysis shows that, compared with BQT alone, BQT plus probiotics can increase the likelihood of eradicating H. pylori and reduce the incidences of side effects as a whole, diarrhea, and bitter taste. These findings are largely consistent with the results of previous meta-analyses. A meta-analysis by Zhang et al. showed that supplementation with probiotics increases the incidence of eradication achieved using anti-H. pylori therapy (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.70–2.22), and reduces the incidence of side effects (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45–0.70).⁴⁴ Another by Zhu et al. yielded pooled ORs for the incidences of eradication and adverse effects in the probiotic group vs. the control group of 1.67 (95% CI: 1.38–2.02) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.26–0.94), respectively.⁴⁵ We also found that probiotic supplementation reduced the incidence of diarrhea, consistent with the results of the studies by Zhang et al. and Zhu et al.^44,45 Furthermore, the incidence of bitter taste was reduced by probiotic supplementation in the present study, but not in the other two studies.^44,45 However, probiotic supplementation did not reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting in our study or in the study by Zhu et al., but did so in the study by Zhang et al.^44,45 Furthermore, the incidence of constipation was reduced in the study by Zhang et al., but not in the present study.⁴⁴ Heterogeneity in the probiotic or polypharmacy-based regimen used may lead to differing findings. In addition, the relatively low number of studies included in the present and previous meta-analyses with respect to each side effect may explain the differences. Finally, differing definitions of each symptom in these studies might also have had an effect. For example, epigastric pain, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and flatus were analyzed separately in the study by Zhang et al., whereas these symptoms were analyzed together as “abdominal discomfort” in the present meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis performed by McFarland et al. showed that not all mixtures of probiotics improve the incidence of eradication of H. pylori or minimize the incidence of side effects. For example, a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum was not effective at improving H. pylori eradiation; and a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium longum mix did not significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events”.⁴⁶ In addition, McNicholl et al. reported that Lactobacillus Plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici neither improved the incidence of eradication nor reduced the incidence of side effects during H. pylori treatment.⁴⁷ These conflicting results might be at least in part explained by the heterogeneity of probiotics, in terms of their species and strains, the doses administered, and the duration of treatment.⁴⁸ The optimum interval between probiotic and antibiotic administration remains unclear, and may be another cause of conflicting results. Indeed, previous publications have not described the most suitable time for probiotic addition.⁴⁹ Although the co-administration of probiotics and antibiotic-based therapies can improve the treatment of H. pylori, it should be noted that such regimens have certain drawbacks. One major issue is that the antibiotics may restrain the growth of the probiotics.⁵⁰ In addition, the potential hazards associated with some probiotic strains should not be ignored. For example, Lactobacillus species can delay or limit the post-antibiotic recovery of the normal host–microbiota balance, resulting in long-term gut dysbiosis.⁵¹ Therefore, further large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to clarify these issues.

The present study is the first meta-analysis of the benefits of probiotic supplementation alongside BQT for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Diarrhea and bitter taste are frequently reported side effects of BQT,^52,53 and the results of the present meta-analysis suggest that probiotics alleviate these side effects. A rigorous search strategy, tight inclusion criteria, and appropriate statistical analyses were used in the present study. However, a limitation of the present meta-analysis is that the included studies had relatively few participants, which limited the quality of the clinical evidence obtained. Second, most of the included studies (8/10) were performed in Asia, which limits the generalizability of the findings to populations in other parts of the world. Third, the included studies differed with respect to the type and dosage of probiotic and the BQT regimen used, which limits the comparability of the results of these studies. Subgroup analyses aimed at identifying the most efficient probiotic strains were not performed because of this heterogeneity in the regimens used. Fourth, the possibility of publication bias was not assessed with respect to the incidence of side effects because of the small number of studies involved.

Conclusions

The popularity of probiotics notwithstanding, the findings of studies performed during recent decades regarding the efficacy of probiotics as part of the treatment of H. pylori have been contradictory. The results of the present meta-analysis supports the use of probiotics in combination with BQT in the clinical management of patients with H. pylori infection. However, further studies are needed to establish the optimal approach to the use of probiotic supplementation during the treatment of H. pylori infection.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605231203841 - Supplemental material for Efficacy and safety of probiotic-supplemented bismuth quadruple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605231203841 for Efficacy and safety of probiotic-supplemented bismuth quadruple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Gaoyan Yao, Xiaoyuan Fan and Dewen Lu in Journal of International Medical Research

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Ting Weng for critically reading the manuscript.

Author contributions

G.Y. conceived the study. G.Y. and X.F. selected the studies for inclusion and extracted the data. D.L. performed the statistical analyses. G.Y. interpreted the results and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. X.F. and D.L. conducted a critical review of the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

ORCID iD

Gaoyan Yao

References

Hooi

JKY

Lai

, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 420–429. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022.

Debowski

Walton

Chua

, et al. Helicobacter pylori gene silencing in vivo demonstrates urease is essential for chronic infection. PLoS Pathog 2017; 13: e1006464. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006464.

Keilberg

Ottemann

KM.

How Helicobacter pylori senses, targets and interacts with the gastric epithelium. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18: 791–806. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13222.

Yang

Using probiotics as supplementation for Helicobacter pylori antibiotic therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 1136. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21031136.

Liu

Meng

, et al. Natural products for the prevention and management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2018; 17: 937–952. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12355.

Miri

Kamankesh

Rad-Malekshahi

, et al. Factors associated with treatment failure, and possible applications of probiotic bacteria in the arsenal against Helicobacter pylori. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2023; 21: 617–639. DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2203382.

Shatila

Thomas

AS.

Current and future perspectives in the diagnosis and management of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 5086. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175086.

Elbehiry

Marzouk

Aldubaib

, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection: current status and future prospects on diagnostic, therapeutic and control challenges. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12: 191. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12020191.

Kosunen

Pukkala

Sarna

, et al. Gastric cancers in Finnish patients after cure of Helicobacter pylori infection: a cohort study. Int J Cancer 2011; 128: 433–439. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25337.

10.

Yeh

Kuntz

Ezzati

, et al. Exploring the cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastric cancer in China in anticipation of clinical trial results. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 157–166. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23864.

11.

Sugano

Tack

Kuipers

, et al. Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Gut 2015; 64: 1353–1367. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252.

12.

Malfertheiner

Megraud

Rokkas

, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report. Gut 2022; gutjnl-2022: 327745. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327745.

13.

Fallone

Moss

Malfertheiner

Reconciliation of recent Helicobacter pylori treatment guidelines in a time of increasing resistance to antibiotics. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 44–53. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.011.

14.

Ding

, et al. Chinese consensus report on family-based Helicobacter pylori infection control and management (2021 Edition). Gut 2022; 71: 238–253. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325630.

15.

Fallone

Chiba

Van Zanten

, et al. The Toronto consensus for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Gastroenterology 2016; 151: 51–69.e14. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.006.

16.

Mahachai

Vilaichone

Pittayanon

, et al. Helicobacter pylori management in ASEAN: the Bangkok consensus report. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 37–56. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13911.

17.

Bang

Lim

Jeong

, et al. Amoxicillin or tetracycline in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut Microbes 2020; 11: 1314–1323. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1754118.

18.

Liou

Fang

Chen

, et al. Concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2355–2365. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31409-x.

19.

Malfertheiner

Bazzoli

Delchier

, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication with a capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus clarithromycin-based triple therapy: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 905–913. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60020-2.

20.

Laine

Hunt

El-Zimaity

, et al. Bismuth-based quadruple therapy using a single capsule of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, North American trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 562–567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.t01-1-07288.x.

21.

Hamilton-Miller

JM.

The role of probiotics in the treatment and prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 22: 360–366. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00153-5.

22.

Patel

Shah

Prajapati

JB.

Clinical application of probiotics in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection–a brief review. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2014; 47: 429–437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.03.010.

23.

Page

Moher

Bossuyt

, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: N160. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160.

24.

Higgins

JPT

Green

Cochrane handbook for systematic review of interventions version 5.1 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. training.cochrane.org/handbook.

25.

Shafaghi

Pourkazemi

Khosravani

, et al. The effect of probiotic plus prebiotic supplementation on the tolerance and efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication quadruple therapy: a randomized prospective double blind controlled trial. Middle East J Dig Dis 2016; 8: 179–188. DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.30.

26.

Tursi

Brandimarte

Giorgetti

, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus casei supplementation on the effectiveness and tolerability of a new second-line 10-day quadruple therapy after failure of a first attempt to cure Helicobacter pylori infection. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10: CR662–CR666. PMID: 15567983.

27.

Shavakhi

Tabesh

Yaghoutkar

, et al. The effects of multistrain probiotic compound on bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blind study. Helicobacter 2013; 18: 280–284. DOI: 10.1111/hel.12047.

28.

Srinarong

Siramolpiwat

Wongcha-um

, et al. Improved eradication rate of standard triple therapy by adding bismuth and probiotic supplement for Helicobacter pylori treatment in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15: 9909–9913. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.9909.

29.

Poonyam

Chotivitayatarakorn

Vilaichone

RK.

High effective of 14-day high-dose PPI-bismuth-containing quadruple therapy with probiotics supplement for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a double blinded-randomized placebo-controlled study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019; 20: 2859–2864. DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.9.2859.

30.

Moreno Márquez

Fernández Álvarez

Valdés Delgado

, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the usefulness of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in bismuth-containing quadruple eradication therapy for infection with Helicobacter pylori. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2022; 114: 89–95. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7931/2021.

31.

Chen

Lee

, et al. The impact of Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication therapy and probiotic supplementation on gut microenvironment homeostasis: An open-label, randomized clinical trial. EBioMedicine 2018; 35: 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.028.

32.

Zhao

Yang

, Arunaet al. Saccharomyces boulardii combined with quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication decreased the duration and severity of diarrhea: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8: 776955. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.776955.

33.

Tang

Huang

, et al. The effect of probiotics supplementation on gut microbiota after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10: 317–333. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-020-00372-9.

34.

Jiang

Zhu

Probiotics improved the effectiveness and safety of the quadruple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Biomed Res (India) 2018; 29: 2053–2056. DOI: 10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-18-527.

35.

Miri

Kamankesh

Llopis-Lorente

, et al. The potential use of antibiotics against Helicobacter pylori infection: biopharmaceutical implications. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 917184. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.917184.

36.

Losurdo

Cubisino

Barone

, et al. Probiotic monotherapy and Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review with pooled-data analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 139–149. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.139.

37.

Homan

Orel

Are probiotics useful in Helicobacter pylori eradication?

World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 10644–10653. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10644.

38.

Bernet

Brassart

Neeser

, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 1 binds to cultured human intestinal cell lines and inhibits cell attachment and cell invasion by enterovirulent bacteria. Gut 1994; 35: 483–489. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.4.483.

39.

Nam

Bae

, et al. Effect of Weissella confusa strain PL9001 on the adherence and growth of Helicobacter pylori. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68: 4642–4645. DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.9.4642-4645.2002.

40.

Gotteland

Cruchet

Verbeke

Effect of Lactobacillus ingestion on the gastrointestinal mucosal barrier alterations induced by indometacin in humans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 11–17. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00898.x.

41.

Gill

HS.

Probiotics to enhance anti-infective defences in the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 17: 755–773. DOI: 10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00074-x.

42.

Murosaki

Muroyama

Yamamoto

, et al. Antitumor effect of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 through restoration of impaired interleukin-12 production in tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2000; 49: 157–164. DOI: 10.1007/s002620050615.

43.

Yuan

Xiao

, et al. The impact of Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication therapy, and probiotics intervention on gastric microbiota in young adults. Helicobacter 2021; 26: e12848. DOI: 10.1111/hel.12848.

44.

Zhang

Zhao

, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of probiotic-supplemented therapy on the eradication of H. pylori and incidence of therapy-associated side effects. Microb Pathog 2020; 147: 104403. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104403.

45.

Zhu

Chen

Zheng

, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 18013–18021. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18013.

46.

McFarland

Huang

Wang

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: multi-strain probiotics as adjunct therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and prevention of adverse events. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 546–561. DOI: 10.1177/2050640615617358.

47.

McNicholl

Molina-Infante

Lucendo

, et al. Probiotic supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici for Helicobacter pylori therapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Helicobacter 2018; 23: e12529. DOI: 10.1111/hel.12529.

48.

Zhu

Liu

Probiotics as an adjuvant treatment in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. J Dig Dis 2017; 18: 195–202. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12466.

49.

Wang

Cao

, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different probiotics supplements for triple helicobacter pylori eradication: a network meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13: 1120789. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1120789.

50.

Wang

Zhou

, et al. Efficacy and safety of probiotics as adjuvant agents for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2015; 9: 707–716. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2174.

51.

Nabavi-Rad

Sadeghi

Asadzadeh Aghdaei

, et al. The double-edged sword of probiotic supplementation on gut microbiota structure in Helicobacter pylori management. Gut Microbes 2022; 14: 2108655. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2108655.

52.

Wang

, et al. Half-dose clarithromycin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy is effective and economical in treating Helicobacter pylori infection: a single-center, open-label, randomized trial. Helicobacter 2019; 24: e12566. DOI: 10.1111/hel.12566.

53.

Hong

Zhu

, et al. Evaluation of first-line bismuth-containing 7-day concomitant quintuple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Dig Dis 2017; 18: 704–708. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12559.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB